High-resolution land cover change detection based on fuzzy uncertainty analysis and change reasoning

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 455-475

  Hester, D B ^a   Nelson, S A C ^a   Cakir, H I ^a   Khorram, S ^a   Cheshire, H ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CIRCUITS; FUZZY LOGIC; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SURFACE WATERS; WATER QUALITY;

FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH; HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGERY; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE; LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION; OVERALL ACCURACIES; POST CLASSIFICATION; REMOTE SENSING DATA; RESEARCH AND APPLICATION;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

DETECTION METHOD; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; LAND COVER; MAPPING METHOD; QUICKBIRD; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77649120567     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431160902893493     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ACHARD, F., EVA, H.D., STIBIG, H.J., MAYAUX, P., GALLEGO, J., RICHARDS, T. and MALINGREAU, J.P., 2002, Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science, 297, pp. 999-1002.
2. ARNOLD, C. and GIBBONS, C., 1996, Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, pp. 243-258.
3. ARNOT, C., FISHER, P.F., WADSWORTH, R. and WELLENS, J., 2004. Landscape metrics with ecotones: pattern under uncertainty. Landscape Ecology, 19, pp. 181-195.
4. BARDOSSY, A., 2002, Fuzzy rule-based classification of remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40, p. 362.
5. BRUZZONE, L. and COSSU, R. 2003, An adaptive approach to reducing registration noise effects in unsupervised change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, pp. 2455-2465.
6. CAKIR, H.I. and KHORRAM, S., 2008, Correspondence analysis fusion. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 74, pp. 183-192.
7. DAI, X.L. and KHORRAM, S., 1998, The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36, pp. 1566-1577.
8. DARE, P.M., 2005, Shadow analysis in high-resolution satellite imagery of urban areas. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71, pp. 169-177.
9. FAUCETTE, L.B., JORDAN, C.F., RISSE, L.M., CABRERA, M., COLEMAN, D.C. and WEST, L.T., 2005, Evaluation of stormwater from compost and conventional erosion control practices in construction activities. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 60, pp. 288-297.
10. FOODY, G.M., 2002, Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, pp. 185-201.
11. HAGEN, A., 2003, Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17, pp. 235-249.
12. HAGEN-ZANKER, A., STRAATMAN, B. and ULJEE, I., 2005, Further developments of a fuzzy set map comparison approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19, pp. 769-785.
13. HAYES, S.A., MCLAUGHLIN, R.A. and OSMOND, D.L., 2005, Polyacrylamide use for erosion and turbidity control on construction sites. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 60, pp. 193-199.
14. HESTER, D.B., KHORRAM, S., NELSON, S.A.C. and CAKIR, H., 2008, Per-pixel classification of high spatial resolution satellite imagery for urban land cover mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 74, pp. 463-471.
15. HU, X.Y., TAO, C.V. and PRENZEL, B., 2005, Automatic segmentation of high-resolution satellite imagery by integrating texture, intensity, and color features. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71, pp. 1399-1406.
16. ISHIBUCHI, H., 2005, Rule weight specification in fuzzy rule-based classification systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 13, p. 428.
17. JENSEN, J., 2005, Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 3rd edn (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall).
18. JENSEN, J.R., COWEN, D.J., ALTHAUSEN, J.D., NARUMALANI, S. and WEATHERBEE, O., 1993, An evaluation of the Coastwatch Change Detection Protocol in South Carolina. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 59, pp. 1039-1046.
19. KHORRAM, S. (Ed.), 1999, Accuracy Assessment of Remote Sensing-Derived Change Detection (Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing).
20. LIU, H. and ZHOU, Q., 2004, Accuracy analysis of remote sensing change detection by rule- based rationality evaluation with post-classification comparison. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, pp. 1037-1050.
21. LU, D., MAUSEL, P., BRONDIZIO, E. and MORAN, E., 2004, Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, pp. 2365-2407.
22. LUCAS, R., 2007, Rule-based classification of multi-temporal satellite imagery for habitat and agricultural land cover mapping. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 62, p. 165.
23. LUCAS, L.A., CENTENO, T.M., and DELGADO, M.R., 2008, Land cover classification based on general type-2 fuzzy classifiers. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 10, pp. 207-216.
24. MORISETTE, J.T., KHORRAM, S. and MACE, T., 1999, Land-cover change detection enhanced with generalized linear models. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, pp. 2703-2721.
25. NELSON, S.A.C., SORRANO, P.A. and QI, J., 2002, Land cover change in the Upper Barataria Basin Estuary, Louisiana, from 1972-1992: increases in wetland area. Environmental Management, 29, pp. 716-727.
26. NEMMOUR, H. and CHIBANI, Y., 2005, Neural network combination by fuzzy integral for robust change detection in remotely sensed imagery. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 2005, pp. 2187-2195.
27. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES (NCDENR), 2006, Final North Carolina Water Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2004). Available online at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/documents/2004IRCategories4- 7.PDF (accessed 7 October 2007).
28. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES (NCDENR), 2007, Final North Carolina Water Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2006). Available online at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/documents/303d_Report.pdf (accessed 7 October 2007).
29. POWER, C., SIMMS, A. and WHITE, R., 2001, Hierarchical fuzzy pattern matching for the regional comparison of land use maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15, pp. 77-100.
30. PRENZEL, B. and TREITZ, P., 2004, Remote sensing change detection for a watershed in north Sulawesi, Indonesia. Progress in Planning, 61, pp. 349-363.
31. RASHED, T., 2008, Remote sensing of within-class change in urban neighborhood structures. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 32, pp. 343-354.
32. RUSSO, F., 1994, Fuzzy methods for multisensor data fusion. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 43, p. 288.
33. SCHUELER, T.R., 1994, The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques, 1, pp. 100-111.
34. SHACKELFORD, A.K. and DAVIS, C.H., 2003, A hierarchical fuzzy classification approach for high-resolution multispectral data over urban areas. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, pp. 1920-1932.
35. SOUTHWORTH, J., 2004, An assessment of Landsat TM band 6 thermal data for analysing land cover in tropical dry forest regions. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, pp. 689-706.
36. th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment, 23-30 April 1980, San Jose, Costa Rica (Ann Arbor: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan), pp. 1227-1237.
37. TANG, X.M., KAINZ, W. and FANG, Y., 2005, Reasoning about changes of land covers with fuzzy settings. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, pp. 3025-3046.
38. US CENSUS BUREAU, 2003, Table HU-EST2002-07-County Housing Unit Estimates. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/2000s/vintage_2002/HU-EST2002- 07.html (accessed 24 October 2007).
39. VAN OORT, P.A.J., 2005, Improving land cover change estimates by accounting for classification errors. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, pp. 3009-3024.
40. VERBYLA, D.L. and BOLES, S.H., 2000, Bias in land cover change estimates due to misregistration. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, pp. 3553-3560.
41. VISSER, H. (Ed.), 2004, The Map Comparison Kit: Methods, Software and Applications. Report 550002005/2004, pp. 1-127 (Bilthoven, The Netherlands: RIVM).
42. VISSER, H. and DE NIJS, T., 2006, The Map Comparison Kit. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21, pp. 346-358.
43. WANG, H.Q. and ELLIS, E.C., 2005, Image misregistration error in change measurements. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 71, pp. 1037-1044.
44. WOODCOCK, C.E. and GOPAL, S., 2000, Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14, pp. 153-172.
45. ZADEH, L.A., 1965, Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, pp. 338-353.
46. ZHANG, Y., 2001, Detection of urban housing development by fusing multisensor satellite data and performing spatial feature post-classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, pp. 3339-3355.