Improving land cover change estimates by accounting for classification errors

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 26, Issue 14, 2005, Pages 3009-3024

  Van Oort, P A J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; ESTIMATION; LAND USE; MAPPING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBABILITY;

BAYES THEOREM; CHANGE DETECTION; LAND COVER CHANGE;

REMOTE SENSING;

ERROR ANALYSIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 23844460889     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431160500057848     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Achard, F., Eva, H.D., Stibig, H.J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T. and Malingreau, J.P., 2002, Determination of deforestation rates of the World's humid tropical forests. Science, 297, pp. 999-1002.
2. Carmel, Y., Dean, D.J. and Flather, C.H., 2001, Combining location and classification error sources for estimating multi-temporal database accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, pp. 865-872.
3. Dai, X.L. and Khorram, S., 1998, The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36, pp. 1566-1577.
4. De Zeeuw, C.J., Bregt, A.K., Sonneveld, M.P.W. and Van Den Brink, J.A.T., 1999, Geoinformation for monitoring land use; from map overlay to object-structured noise reduction. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 1-3 September 1999, Florence, Italy, pp. 419-425 (Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE).
5. De Zeeuw, C.J. and Hazeu, G.W. (Eds), 2001, Monitoring Land Use Changes Using Geo-Information. Possibilities, Methods and Adapted Techniques. Alterra Report 214, Alterra (Wageningen, Netherlands: Green World Research).
6. FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee), 1998, Spatial Data Transfer Standard. FGDC-STD-002-1998 (Springfield, VA: Computer Products Office, National Technical Information Service).
7. Foody, G.M., 2002, Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, pp. 185-201.
8. Khveri, H.T., Caccetta, P. and Evans, F., 2001, Use of conditional probability networks for environmental monitoring. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, pp. 1173-1190.
9. Lunetta, R.S., Ediriwickrema, J., Johnson, D.M., Lyon, J.G. and McKerrow, A., 2002, Impacts of vegetation dynamics on the identification of land-cover change in a biologically complex community in North Carolina, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82, pp. 258-270.
10. Macleod, R.D. and Congalton, R.G., 1998, A quantitative comparison of change detection algorithms for monitoring eelgrass from remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 64, pp. 207-216.
11. Mas, J.F., 1999, Monitoring land-cover changes: a comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, pp. 139-152.
12. O'Hagan, A., 1994, Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2B: Bayesian Inference (New York: Halsted).
13. Petit, C.C. and Lambin, E.F., 2002, Impact of data integration technique on historical land-use/land-cover change: comparing historical maps with remote sensing data in the Belgian Ardennes. Landscape Ecology, 17, pp. 117-132.
14. Power, C., Simms, A. and White, R., 2001, Hierarchical fuzzy pattern matching for the regional comparison of land use maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15, pp. 77-100.
15. Rosenfield, G.H., 1982, Sample design for estimating change in land use and land cover. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 84, pp. 793-801.
16. Singh, A., 1989, Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10, pp. 989-1003.
17. Sonneveld, M.P.W., Van Den Brink, J.A.T., De Zeeuw, C.J. and Bregt, A.K., 2000, Noise reduction in GIS-based land use monitoring. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, 10-12 August 2000, Beijing, Section 5a, pp. 44-56.
18. Stow, D.A. and Chen, D.M., 2002, Sensitivity of multitemporal NOAA AVHRR data of an urbanizing region to land-use/land-cover changes and misregistration. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, pp. 297-307.
19. Townshend, J.R.G., Justice, C.O., Gurney, C. and McManus, J., 1992, The impact of misregistration on change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscienee and Remote Sensing, 30, pp. 1054-1060.
20. Van Asperen, P., 1997, Controlling the process: digital map revision experiences from Holland. Geomatics Info Magazine, 11, pp. 76-79.
21. Verbyla, D.L. and Boles, S.H., 2000, Bias in land cover change estimates due to misregistration. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, pp. 3553-3560.
22. Veregin, H., 1989, Error modelling for the map overlay operation. In Accuracy of Spatial Databases, M.F. Goodchild and S. Gopal (Eds), pp. 3-18 (London: Taylor & Francis).
23. Vitousek, P.M., 1994, Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology, 75, pp. 1861-1876.