Classroom performance system use in an accelerated graduate nursing program

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 79-85

  Grimes, Corinne ^a   Joiner Rogers, Glenda ^a   Volker, Deborah ^a   Ramberg, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom performance system; Nursing education; Program evaluation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; COOPERATION; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; EDUCATION, PROFESSIONAL, RETRAINING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY, NURSING; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENTS, NURSING; TEXAS;

EID: 77649113176     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181cd822c     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Robinson D, Goodliffe A. Utilizing the classroom performance system in large introductory geology classes. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 2005;37(7):263. http://gsa. confex.com/gsa/2005AM/finalprogram/ abstract-96060.htm. Accessed June 16, 2008.
2. Sellheim DO. Physical Therapy Students' Approaches to Learning: Faculty Beliefs and Other Educational Factors That Influence Them [dissertation]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota; 2001.
3. Skiba DJ. Got large lecture hall classes? Use clickers. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2006;27:278-280.
4. Ficca MS. The Congruency Between Actual and Intended Teaching Strategies Used by Nursing Faculty in BSN Programs [dissertation]. Chester, PA: Widener University; 1999.
5. Hafner K. In class, the audience weighs in. New York Times. April 29, 2004:1.
6. Koeckeritz JL, Hopkins KV, Merrill AS. ILEUM: interactive learning can be effective using mnemonics. Nurs Educ. 2004;29:75-79.
7. DeBourgh GA. Predictors of student satisfaction in distancedelivered graduate nursing courses: what matters most? J Prof Nurs. 2003;19:149-163.
8. Rice RE, Bunz U. Evaluating a wireless course feedback system: the role of demographics, expertise, fluency, competency, and usage. Simile [serial online]. 2006;6:3. http://web.ebscohost.com/ ehost/detail?vid//3&hid// 6&sid//132dd2e5-da41-4194-9e60- 214d4ec6a837%40sessionmgr9. Accessed June 16, 2008.
9. Slain D, Abate M, Hodges B, Stamatakis MK, Wolak S. An interactive response system to promote active learning in the doctor of pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ [serial online]. 2004; 68(5):117. http://www.ajpe.org/view.asp? art//aj6805117&pdf// yes. Accessed June 16, 2008.
10. Latessa R, Mouw D. Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. Fam Med. 2005;37:12-14.
11. Greer L, Heaney PJ. Real-time analysis of student comprehension: an assessment of electronic student response technology in an introductory earth science course. J Geosci Educ. 2004;52:345-351.
12. Holmes RG, Blalock JS, Parker MH, Haywood VB. Student accuracy and evaluation of a computer-based audience response system. J Dent Educ. 2006;70:1355-1361.
13. Woods AH, Chiu C. Wireless response technology in college classrooms. http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~ctalk/talks/march25.htm. Accessed June 18, 2008.
14. Roy KH. Pilot investigation of the utility of a student response system in medical student lectures. J Audiov Media Med. 1996; 19:27-32.
15. DeBourgh GA. Use of classroom clickers to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse Educ Pract. 2008;8:76-87.
16. Stein PS, Challman SD, Brueckner JK. Using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45:469-473.
17. Menon AS, Moffett S, Enriquez M, Martinez MM, Dev P, Grappone T. Audience response made easy: using personal digital assistants as a classroom polling tool. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:217-220.
18. Nosek T, Wang W, Medvedev I, Wile M, O'Brien T. Use of a computerized audience response system in medical student teaching: its effect on active learning and exam performance. In: Reeves T, Yamashita S, eds. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government,Healthcare, andHigher Education 2006. Chesapeake, VA: AACE; 2006:2245-2250.
19. Miller RG, Ashar BH, Getz KJ. Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003;23:109-115.
20. Gamito EJ, Burhansstipanov L, Krebs LU, Bemis L, Bradley A. The use of an electronic audience response system for data collection. J Cancer Educ. 2005;20(suppl):80-86.