Pilot investigation of the utility of a student response system in medical student lectures

Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 27-32

  Roy, Kathryn H ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TEACHING;

ATTENTION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 80052439373     PISSN: 17453054     EISSN: 17453062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453059609018385     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bligh D. What's the Use of Lectures? 4th edn. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980.
2. Thomas EJ. The variation of memory with time information appearing during a lecture. Studies in Adult Education 1972;1:57-62.
3. Bligh D. Teaching Students in Groups. London: University Teaching Methods Unit, 1971.
4. Bligh D, Jaques D, Piper DW. Seven Decisions when Teaching Students. Exeter: Wheaton, 1981.
5. Patrick J. Training: Research and Practice. London: Academic Press, 1992.
6. Holling K. The feedback classroom. Programmed Learning 1964;1:17-20.
7. Brown GA, Daines JM. Learning from lectures. In: Oxtoby E, ed. Higher Education at the Crossroads. Guildford: Society for Research and Higher Education, 1981.
8. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors. Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London: Kiek and Read, 1993.
9. Keller JM, Kopp TW. An application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In: Reigeluth CM, ed. Instructional Design Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987.