Selectivity and stoichiometry boosting of β?-Cyclodextrin in Cationic/Anionic surfactant Systems: When Host-Guest equilibrium meets biased aggregation equilibrium

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 114, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 2165-2174

  Jiang, Lingxiang ^a   Yan, Yun ^a   Huang, Jianbin ^a   Yu, Caifang ^b   Jin, Changwen ^b   Deng, Manli ^c   Wang, Yilin ^c  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATES; CATIONIC SURFACTANTS; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; STOICHIOMETRY;

AGGREGATION EQUILIBRIA; AQUEOUS SYSTEM; BINDING CONSTANT; CATIONIC/ANIONIC SURFACTANT; COMPOSITION VARIATION; DEGREE OF FREEDOM; ELECTROSTATIC ATTRACTIONS; HOST-GUESTS; MOLAR FRACTIONS; OPPOSITELY CHARGED SURFACTANTS; SELECTIVE BINDING;

EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS;

EID: 77649111697     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: 15205207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp911092y     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. (a) Pedersen, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 2495.
2. (b) Pedersen, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Enel. 1988, 27, 1021.
3. (a) Hayashi, N.; Kuruma, K.; Mazaki, Y.; Imakubo, T.; Kobayashi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998 120, 3799.
4. (b) Otto, S.;Osifchin, M.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7276.
5. (c) Svoboda, J.; Konig, B. Chem. Rev. 2006. 106. 5413.
6. Trend, J. E.; Kipke, C. A.; Rossmann, M.; Yafuso, M.; Patil, S. L. U.S. Patent 5,474,743, 1993.
7. For reviews, see: (a) Hao, J.; Hoffmann, H. Curr. Qpin. Colloid Interface Sci, 2004, 9, 279.
8. (b) Tondre, C.; Caillet, C. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci 2001, 93, 115.
9. Note that a similar term "catanionic surfactant" refers to a compound that is usually formed by an equimolar chemical reaction of a basic and an acidic surfactant. For example, see:
10. (c) Consola, S.; Blanzat, M.; Perez, E.; Garrigues, J. C.; Borda, P.; Rico-Lattes, I. Chem-Eur. J. 2007,13, 3039.
11. (d) Rico-Lattes, L; Blanzat, M.; FranceschiMessant, S.; Perez, E.; Lattes, A. C. R. Chim. 2005, 8, 807.
12. (a) Rosen, M. J. Surfactants and Interfacial. Phenomena; Wiley & Sons: New York, 1989.
13. (b) Yu, Z. J.; Zhao, G. X. J, Colloid Interface Sci. 1989, 130, 414.
14. (a) Kaler, E. W.; Murthy, A. K.; Rodriguez, B. E.; Zasadzinski, J. A. N. Science 1989, 245, 1371.
15. (b) Kaler, E. W.; Herrington, K. L.; Murthy, A. K.; Zasadzinski, J. A. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 6698.
16. For icosahedra, see: (a) Dubios, M. Deme, B.; Gulik-Krzywicki, T.; Dedieu, J.-C.; Vautrin, C.; Desert, S.; Perez, Emile.; Zemb, T. Nature 2001, 411, 672. For flat nanodiscs, see:
17. (b) Zemb, T.; Dubios, M.; Deme, B.; Gulik-Krzywicki, T. Science 1999, 283, 816. For onion structures, see:
18. (c) Song, A. X.; Dong, S. L.; Jia, X. F.; Hao, J. C.; Liu, W. M.; Liu, T. B. Angew Chem, Int, 2005, 44, 4018. For polyhedra, see:
19. (d) Gonzalez- Perez, A.; Schmutz, M.; Waton, G.; Romero, M. L; Krafft, M. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 756. For tubelike structures, see:
20. (e) Lu, T.; Han, F.; Li, Z. C.; Huang, J. B.; Fu, H. L. Langmuir 2006, 22, 2045.
21. (f) Yan, Y.; Xiong, W.; Li, X. X.; Lu, T.; Huang, J. B.; Li, Z. C.; Fu, II. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 2225. For hollow cones, see:
22. (g) Douliez, J.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 727, 15694.
23. (a) Yin, H. Q.; Zhou, Z. K.; Huang, J. B.; Zheng, R.; Zhang, Y. Y. Mm Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2188.
24. (b) Renoncourt, A.; Vlachy, N.; Bauduin, P.; Drechsler, M.; Touraud, D.; Verbavatz, J. M.; Dubois, M.; Kunz, W.; Ninham, B. W. Lanemuir 2007.23, 2376.
25. (c) Jiang, L. X.; Wang, K.; Deng, M. L.; Wang, Y. L.; Huang, J. B. Lanemuir 2008, 24, 4600.
26. (d) Jiang, L. X.; Wang, K.; Ke, F. Y.; Liang, D. H.; Huang, J. B. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 599.
27. (a) Rubingh, D. N. Solution Chemistry of Surfactants; Plenum Press: New'York, 1979.
28. (b) Holland, P. M.; Rubingh.D. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 1984.
29. (c) Herrington, K. L.; Kaler, E. W.; Miller, D. D.; Zasadzinski,J. A.; Chiruvolu, S. J. Phys. Chem 1993, 97, 13792.
30. (d) Rodenas, E.; Valiente, M.; Villafruela, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 70. 103, 4549.
31. (e) Nagarajan, R.; Ruckenstein, E. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1979, 77, 580.
32. Yuet, P. K.; Biankschtein, D. Langmuir 1996, 12, 3802.
33. (a) Rosen, M. J.; Hua, X. Y. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1982, 86, 164.
34. (b) Goraiczyk, D. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1991, 759, 361.
35. (c) Rosen, M. J.; Hua, X. Y. J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc. 1982, 59, 582.
36. (a) Saenger, W.; Muller-Fahrnow, A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Enel. 1988, 27, 393.
37. (b) Junquera, E.; Tardajos, G.; Aicart, E. lanemuir 1993, 9, 1213.
38. (c) Mwakibete, IL; Cristantino, R.; Bloor, D. M.; Wyn-Jones, E.; Holzwarth, J. F. Langmuir 1995, 11, 57.
39. (d) Don-ego, A. B.; Garcia-Rio, L.; Herves, P.; Leis, J. R.; Mejuto, J. C.; Perez-Juste, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2945.
40. (e) Dharmawardana, U. R.; Christian, S. D.; Tucker, E. E.; Taylor, R. W.; Scamehorn, J. F. Lanemuir 1993, 9, 2258.
41. (a) Cabaleiro-Lago, C.; Garcia-Ro, L.; Hervs, P.; Prez-Juste, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6749.
42. (b) Haller, L; Kaatze, U. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 1940.
43. (c) Nilsson, M.; Valente, A. J. M.; Olofsson, G.; Sderman, O.; Bonini, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 11310.
44. (d) Mehta, S. K.; Bhasin, K. K.; Dham, S.; Singla, M. L. J, Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 321, 442.
45. Xing, H.; Lin, S. S.; Yan, P.; Xiao, J. X.; Chen, Y. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 777, 8089.
46. Jiang, L. X.; Deng, M. L.; Wang, Y. L.; Liang, D. H.; Yan, Y.; Huang, J. B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 7498.
47. Myers, D. Surfaces, Interfaces, and Colloids, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1999.
48. Misselyn-Bauduin, A. M.; Thibaut, A.; Grandjean, J.; Broze, G.; Jerome, R. Langmumir 2000, 16, 4430.
49. (a) Yunus, W. M. Z.; Taylor, J.; Bloor, D. M.; Hall, D. G.; WynJones, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 8979.
50. (b) Park, J. W.; Song, H. J. J. Phys, ChEm- 1989, 93,6454.
51. (a) Pettersson, E.; Topgaard, D.; Stilbs, P.; Söderman, O. Langmuir 2004, 20, 1138.
52. (b) Otto, W. H.; Britten, D. J.; Larive, C. K. J. Colloid Interface Sci 2003, 267, 508.
53. (a) Stejskal, J. E.; Tanner, J. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 40, 345.
54. (b)stiibs, p. Prog, NMR Spectrosc. 1987, 19, 1.
55. Actually, the Le Chatelier principle also predicts that β-CD will form more complexes with the surfactant at a higher concentration. According to this principle, one might intuitively expect the difference to be similar to the difference in concentrations of the two surfactants. In the present case (SDS/DEAB 15/5 mM), it was found that the selectivity of β-CD to SDS over that to DEAB is ∼100:1, much larger than the ratio of concentrations of SDS and DEAB, 3:1. Therefore, the interplay between the host-guest and biased aggregation equilibria is within the frame of the Le Chatelier principle, yet they are not exactly the same. In addition, the present thermodynamic model can predict the exact value of the selectivity, whereas the Le Chatelier principle cannot.
56. Recently, it has been established that β-CD can form aggregates with diameters ∼200 nm above 3 mM by itself; see:
57. (a) Bonini, M.; Rossi, S.; Karlsson, G.; Almgren, M.; Nostra, P. L.; Baglioni, P. Innemuir 2006, 22, 1478.
58. (b) Rossi, S.; Bonini, M. Nostra, P. L.; Baglioni, P. Langmuir 2007, 23, 10959, and references thereinHowever, in the present case of SDS/DEAB/β-CD solutions, most ofβ-CD will form complexes with SDS or DEAB, and the complexes will not aggregate, as evidenced by the diffusion coefficient of the complexes (measured by PGSE-NMR).
59. Rubingh, D. N.; Holland, P. M. Cationic Surfactants: Physical Chemistry; M. Dekker: New York, 1991.