Optimization of anastomotic configuration in CABG surgery

Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1097-1106

  Sui, Yunkang ^a   Ma, Baosheng ^a   Chu, Bo ^a   Qiao, Aike ^a  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Hemodynamics; Numerical simulation; Optimization; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EXPERIENCE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DIAMETER RATIO; GEOMETRIC FACTORS; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; WALL SHEAR STRESS GRADIENTS;

BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); HEMODYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURGERY;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 77649108130     PISSN: 10698299     EISSN: 10990887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1310     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Pedrini L, Pisano E, Donato Di Paola M, Ballester A, Magnoni F. Late occlusion of aortofemoral bypass graft: surgical treatment. Cardiovascular Surgery 1994; 2(6):763-766.
2. Glagov S. Intimal Hyperplasia, vascular modeling, and the restenosis problem. Circulation 1994; 89(6):2888-2891.
3. Bonert M, Myers JG, Fremes SE, Ethier CR. Influence of graft/host diameter ratio on the hemodynamics in sequential ITA anastomoses. In 2000 Advances in Bioengineering, Conway TA (ed.), vol. 48. American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, 2000; 269-270.
4. Longest PW, Kleinstreuer C. Patical-hymodynamics modeling of the distal end to side femoral bypass: effects of graft caliber and graft-end cut. Medical Engineering and Physics 2003; 25(10):843-858.
5. Schneider JR, Zwolak RM, Walsh DB, McDaniel MD, Cronenwett JL. Lack of diameter effect on short-term patency of size-matched dacron aortobifemoral grafts. Journal of Vascular 1991; 13(6):785-791.
6. Bonert M, Myers JG, Fremes S, Williams J, Ethier CR. A numerical study of blood flow in coronary artery bypass graft side-to-side anastomoses. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2002; 30(5):599-611.
7. Abbott WM, Green RM, Matsumoto T, Wheeler JR, Miller N, Veith FJ, Suggs WD, Hollier L, Money S, Garrett HE, Moore WS, Dean RH, Cronenwett JL, Carter S, Greenhalgh RM, ODonnell TF. Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: results of a multicenter randomized prospective trial. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997; 25(1):19-28.
8. Qiao AK, Liu YJ. Numerical study of hemodynamics comparison between small and large femoral bypass grafts. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 2008; 24(11):1067-1078.
9. Qiao AK, Liu YJ, Guo ZH. Wall shear stresses in small and large two-way bypass grafts. Medical Engineering and Physics 2006; 28(3):251-258.
10. Inzoli F, Migliavacca F, Pennati G. Numerical analysis of steady flow in aorto-coronary bypass 3-D model. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the ASME 1996; 118(2):172-179.
11. Cole JS, Watterson JK, O'Reilly MJG. Numerical investigation of the haemodynamics at a patched arterial bypass anastomosis. Medical Engineering and Physics 2002; 24(6):393-401.
12. Buchanan JR, Kleinstreuer C, Truskey GA, Lei M. Relation between non-uniform hemodynamics and sites of altered permeability and lesion growth at the rabbit aorto-celiac junction. Atherosclerosis 1999; 143(1):27-40.
13. Ma BS. The application of response surface methodology in some practical projects of optimization. Master Dissertation, Beijing University of Technology, May 2007.
14. Sui YK, Bai HB. Plate-shell structural optimization based on central point's accurate response surface method. Journal of Machine Design 2005; 22(11):10-11.
15. Dobrin PB, Hodgett D, Canfield T, Mrkvicka R. Mechanical determinants of graft kinking. Annals of Vascular Surgery 2001; 15(3):343-349.
16. Loth F, Jones SA, Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Nassar RF, Glagov S, Bassiouny HS. Relative contribution of wall shear stress and injury in experimental intimal thickening at PTFE end-to-side arterial anastomoses. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the ASME 2002; 124(1):44-51.
17. Steinman DA, Ethier CR. The effect of wall distensibility on flow in a 2-dimensional end-to-side anastomosis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the ASME 1994; 116(3):294-301.