A vision of dialogical pluralism in psychology

New Ideas in Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 227-234

  Smythe, William E ^a   McKenzie, Stephanie A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77549085376     PISSN: 0732118X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.09.016     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bugental J.T.F. The third force in psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 3 (1963) 19-26
2. Buss D.M. Evolutionary psychology: a new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry 6 (1995) 1-30
3. Derksen M. Are we not experimenting then? The rhetorical demarcation of psychology and common sense. Theory & Psychology 7 (1997) 435-456
4. Derksen M. Against integration: why evolution cannot unify the social sciences. Theory & Psychology 15 (2005) 139-162
5. Drob S.L. Fragmentation in contemporary psychology: a dialectical solution. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 43 (2003) 102-123
6. Gable S.L., and Haidt J. What (and why) is positive psychology. Review of General Psychology 9 (2005) 103-110
7. Gaulin S.J.C., and McBurney D.H. Psychology: An evolutionary approach (2001), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
8. Gieryn T.F. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48 (1983) 781-795
9. Gieryn T.F. Boundaries of science. In: Jasanoff S., Markle G.E., Petersen J.C., and Pinch T. (Eds). Handbook of science and technology studies (1995), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 393-443
10. Gieryn T.F. Policing STS: a boundary-work souvenir from the Smithsonian Exhibition on "Science in American Life". Science, Technology, & Human Values 21 (1996) 100-115
11. Gieryn T.F. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line (1999), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
12. Gieryn T.F., Bevins G.M., and Zehr S.C. Professionalization of American scientists: public science in the creation/evolution trials. American Sociological Review 50 (1985) 392-409
13. Goertzen J.R. Convergent pluralism and the unity-disunity debate in psychology. History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin 19 (2007) 11-16
14. Goertzen J.R. Dialectical pluralism: a theoretical conceptualization of pluralism in psychology. New Ideas in Psychology 28 2 (2010) 201-209
15. Gülerce A. Self-reflective transformational-transformative co-ordinations of the psychological. New Ideas in Psychology 28 2 (2010) 210-218
16. James W. Pragmatism (1975), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (original work published 1907)
17. James W. A pluralistic universe (1977), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (original work published 1909)
18. Leahey T.H. A history of psychology: Main currents in psychological thought. 5th ed. (2004), Prentice Hall, Saddle River, NJ
19. Symposium on explanatory pluralism [special section]. In: Looren de Jong H. (Ed). Theory & Psychology 11 (2001) 731-817
20. Martin J. Fragmentation, hermeneutics, scholarship, and liberal education in psychology. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 21 (2000) 305-314
21. Martin J. The psychology of personhood: conditions for a viable, neo-Meadian pluralism. New Ideas in Psychology 28 2 (2010) 219-226
22. McCauley R.N., and Bechtel W. Explanatory pluralism and heuristic identity theory. Theory & Psychology 11 (2001) 736-760
23. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology (1967), Meredith, New York, NY
24. Ormiston G.L., and Schrift A.D. The hermeneutic tradition: From Ast to Ricouer (1990), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
25. Richardson F.C. Overcoming fragmentation in psychology: a hermeneutic approach. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 21 (2000) 289-304
26. Rogers C.R. Toward a science of the person. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 3 (1963) 72-92
27. Seligman M.E.P., and Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. American Psychologist 55 (2000) 5-14
28. Seligman M.E.P., Steen T.A., Park N., and Peterson C. Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist 60 (2005) 410-421
29. Slife B.D. Are discourse communities incommensurable in a fragmented psychology? The possibility of disciplinary coherence. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 21 (2000) 261-272
30. Smythe W.E., and McKenzie S. A mythological approach to the unity debate in psychology. Canadian Journal of Psychology 46 2a (2005) 180
31. Sugarman J., and Martin J. Toward an alternative psychology. In: Slife B.D., Reber J.S., and Richardson F.C. (Eds). Critical thinking about psychology: Hidden assumptions and plausible alternatives (2005), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 251-266
32. Teo T. Ontology and scientific explanation: pluralism as an a priori condition of psychology. New Ideas in Psychology 28 2 (2010) 235-243
33. Tolman C.W. Pluralistic monism: William James as closet-Heraclitean. The Psychological Record 39 (1989) 177-194
34. Viney W., King C.L., and King D.B. William James on the advantages of a pluralist psychology. In: Donnelly M.E. (Ed). Reinterpreting the legacy of William James (1992), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 91-100
35. Walsh-Bowers R. Some social-historical issues underlying psychology's fragmentation. New Ideas in Psychology 28 2 (2010) 244-252
36. Watanabe T. Metascientific foundations for pluralism in psychology. New Ideas in Psychology 28 2 (2010) 253-262
37. Watson J.B. Psychology as the Behaviorist views it. Psychological Review 20 (1913) 158-177
38. Watson R.I. Psychology: a prescriptive science. American Psychologist 22 (1967) 435-443
39. Yanchar S.C., and Slife B.D. Putting it all together: toward a hermeneutic unity of psychology. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 21 (2000) 315-326