An image-guided system based on custom templates: Case reports

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 40-47

  Blanchet, Eric ^a   Lucchini, Jean Pierre ^a   Jenny, Rene ^a   Fortin, Thomas ^b  

^a Lyon University ^*  (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Dental implants; Ideal placement; Image guided system; Prosthetic axis; Surgical template

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 7744244749     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00026.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, Brajnovic I, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Suetens P. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17:663-670.
2. Birkfellner W, Solar P, Gahleitner K, et al. In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:69-78.
3. Fortin T, Coudert JL, Champleboux G, Sautot P, Lavallee S. Computer assisted dental implant surgery using computed tomography. J Image Guid Surg 1995; 1:53-58.
4. Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Figl M, et al. Computer-enhanced stereoscopic vision in a head-mounted display for oral implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13:610-616.
5. Solar P, Grampp S, Gsellmann B. A computer-aided navigation system for oral implant surgery using 3D-CT reconstruction and real time video-projection. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman A, eds. Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 1996:884-887.
6. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S, Buatois H, Coudert JL. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implant based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13:651-656.
7. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Lormée J, Coudert JL. Very precise dental implant placement on bone using surgical guides in conjunction with medical imaging techniques. J Oral Implantol 2000; 2:300-303.
8. Klein M, Abrams M. Computer-guided surgery utilizing a computer-milled surgical template. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001; 13:165-169.
9. Brief J, Hassfeld S, Redlich T, et al. Robot assisted insertion of dental implants. A clinical evaluation. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman A, eds. Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 2000:932-937.
10. Demey S, Vrielinck L. Drilling templates for oral implants based on preoperative planning on CT images. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman A, eds. Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 1999:883-887.
11. Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Naert I, Quirynen M, Hermans R, Van Steenberghe D. Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre-operative planning of endosseous implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28:37-41.
12. Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, Van Steenberghe D. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28:105-111.
13. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchal G, Naert I Suetens P, Van Steenberghe D. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: a three-dimensional approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:806-810.
14. Cinquin P, Bainville E, Barbe C, et al. Computer assisted medical interventions, passive and semi-active aids. IEEE Eng Med Biol 1995; May/June:254-263.
15. Champleboux G, Blanchet E, Fortin T, Coudert JL. A fast, accurate and easy method to position oral implant according to computed tomography. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman A, eds. Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 1998:836-841.
16. Champleboux G, Fortin T, Buatois H, Coudert JL, Blanchet E. A fast, accurate and easy method to position oral implant according to computed tomography: clinical validations. In: Wells WM, Colchester A, Delp S, eds. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1998:269-276.
17. Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on three-dimensional images: an in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. (Submitted)
18. Miyamoto M, Ichikawa T, Horiuchi M, Okamoto Y. Pilot-hole preparation: technical note presenting a new technique for proper implant positioning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:319-325.
19. Minoretti R, Merz BR, Triaca A. Predetermined implant positioning by means of a novel guide template technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11:266-272.
20. Brånemark P-I, Engstrand P, Ohrnell L-O, et al. Brånemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. J Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999; 1:2-16.
21. Tyndall AA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89:630-637.
22. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, et al. European Association for Osseointegration guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13:566-570.
23. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28:245-248.
24. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:1558-1564.