Diet and gastrointestinal signal on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of mice

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 273-280

  Kiryu, Shigeru ^a   Inoue, Yusuke ^a   Yoshikawa, Kohki ^b   Shimada, Morio ^c   Watanabe, Makoto ^a   Ohtomo, Kuni ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b KOMAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOHO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Diet; Gastrointestinal system; Lymphography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Maximum intensity projection; Mouse

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOFLUORINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABDOMEN; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD PROCESSING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY; LYMPH NODE; LYMPHOGRAPHY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POTATO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWEET POTATO; TRUNK;

ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIET; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL CONTENTS; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; IPOMOEA BATATAS; MUS; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 77349094978     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Marzola P., Sbarbati A. Magnetic resonance imaging in animal models of pathologies. Methods in enzymology 2004, 386:177-200.
2. Pautler R.G. Mouse MRI: concepts and applications in physiology. Physiology (Bethesda) 2004, 19:168-175.
3. Beckmann N., Mueggler T., Allegrini P.R., Laurent D., Rudin M. From anatomy to the target: contributions of magnetic resonance imaging to preclinical pharmaceutical research. Anat Rec 2001, 265:85-100.
4. Chatham J.C., Blackband S.J. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging in animal research. ILAR J 2001, 42:189-208.
5. Goehde S.C., Ajaj W., Lauenstein T., Debatin J.F., Ladd M.E. Impact of diet on stool signal in dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 20:272-278.
6. Kinner S., Kuehle C.A., Langhorst J., Ladd S.C., Nuefer M., Barkhausen J., et al. MR colonography with fecal tagging: do individual patient characteristics influence image quality?. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:1007-1012.
7. Kuehle C.A., Langhorst J., Ladd S.C., Zoepf T., Nuefer M., Grabellus F., et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population. Gut 2007, 56:1079-1085.
8. Lauenstein T., Holtmann G., Schoenfelder D., Bosk S., Ruehm S.G., Debatin J.F. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. Am J Roentgenol 2001, 177:823-827.
9. Inoue Y., Nomura Y., Haishi T., Yoshikawa K., Seki T., Tsukiyama-Kohara K., et al. Imaging living mice using a 1-T compact MRI system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24:901-907.
10. Inoue Y., Yoshikawa K., Nomura Y., Izawa K., Shimada M., Tojo A., et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for MRI of the mouse liver. NMR Biomed 2007, 20:726-732.
11. Kiryu S., Inoue Y., Watanabe M., Izawa K., Shimada M., Tojo A., et al. Evaluation of gadoxetate disodium as a contrast agent for mouse liver imaging: comparison with gadobenate dimeglumine. Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 27:101-107.
12. Herborn C.U., Vogt F.M., Lauenstein T.C., Goyen M., Dirsch O., Corot C., et al. Assessment of normal, inflammatory, and tumor-bearing lymph nodes with contrast-enhanced interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography: preliminary results in rabbits. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003, 18:328-335.
13. Shimada M., Yoshikawa K., Suganuma T., Kayanuma H., Inoue Y., Ito K., et al. Interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography: comparative animal study of gadofluorine 8 and gadolinium diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003, 7:641-646.
14. Vassallo P., Matei C., Heston W.D., McLachlan S.J., Koutcher J.A., Castellino R.A. Characterization of reactive versus tumor-bearing lymph nodes with interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography in an animal model. Invest Radiol 1995, 0:706-711.
15. Staatz G., Nolte-Ernsting C.C., Adam G.B., Grosskortenhaus S., Misselwitz B., Bücker A., et al. Interstitial T1-weighted MR lymphography: lipophilic perfluorinated gadolinium chelates in pigs. Radiology 2001, 20:129-134.
16. Ross J.S., Masaryk T.J., Modic M.T. Three-dimensional FLASH imaging: applications with gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989, 3:547-552.
17. Frahm J., Haase A., Matthaei D. Rapid three-dimensional MR imaging using the FLASH technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986, 10:363-368.
18. Wesbey G., Adamis M.K., Edelman R.R. Artifacts in MR-imaging: description, causes, and solutions. Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1996, 116. WB Saunders, Philadelphia. 2nd ed. R.R. Edelman, J.R. Hesselink, M.B. Zlatkin (Eds.).
19. Fishbein M.H., Gardner K.G., Potter C.J., Schmalbrock P., Smith M.A. Introduction of fast MR imaging in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. Magn Reson Imaging 1997, 15:287-293.
20. Yasuhara M., Ohama T., Matsuki N., Saito H., Shiga J., Inoue K., et al. Induction of fatty liver by fasting in suncus. J Lipid Res 1991, 32:887-891.
21. Lauenstein T.C., Goehde S.C., Ruehm S.G., Holtmann G., Debatin J.F. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2002, 223:248-254.
22. Papanikolaou N., Grammatikakis J., Maris T., Lauenstein T., Prassopoulos P., Gourtsoyiannis N. MR colonography with fecal tagging: comparison between 2D turbo FLASH and 3D FLASH sequences. Eur Radiol 2003, 13:448-452.
23. Fletcher J.G., Luboldt W. CT colonography and MR colonography: current status, research directions and comparison. Eur Radiol 2000, 10:786-801.
24. Inoue Y., Izawa K., Kiryu S., Tojo A., Ohtomo K. Diet and abdominal autofluorescence detected by in vivo fluorescence imaging of living mice. Mol Imaging 2008, 7:21-27.