Interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography: Comparative animal study of gadofluorine 8 and gadolinium diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 641-646

  Shimada, Morio ^a   Yoshikawa, Kohki ^b   Suganuma, Tsunetoku ^c   Kayanuma, Hideki ^c   Inoue, Yusuke ^b   Ito, Kuniko ^a   Senoo, Atsushi ^d   Hayashi, Sanshin ^a  

^a TOHO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b THE UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c AZABU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contrast agents; Experimental studies; Gadolinium; Interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography; Lymph node

Indexed keywords

BODY FLUIDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETISM; PHANTOMS;

ANIMAL STUDIES; CONTRAST AGENT; DIETHYLENETRIAMINE PENTA-ACETIC ACIDS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GADOLINIA; INTERSTITIAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE LYMPHOGRAPHY; INTERSTITIALS; LYMPH NODE; PHANTOM IMAGING; SIGNAL INTENSITIES;

GADOLINIUM;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; G8; GADOFLUORINE 8; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOTERIC ACID; MAGNAVIST; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DRUG ACCUMULATION; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERSTITIAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE LYMPHOGRAPHY; LYMPH NODE; LYMPHOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; POPLITEAL LYMPH NODE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0041704716     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200307000-00036     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Harisinghani MG, Saini S, Weissleder R, et al. MR lymphangiography using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide in patients with primary abdominal and pelvic malignancies: radiographicpathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:1347-1351.
2. Rogers JM, Jung CW, Lewis J, et al. Use of USPIO-induced magnetic susceptibility artifacts to identity sentinel lymph nodes and lymphatic drainage patterns. I. Dependence of artifact size with subcutaneous Combidex dose in rats. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998; 16:917-923.
3. Vassalo PV, Matei CM, Heston WDW, et al. AMI-227-enhanced MR lymphography: usefulness for differentiating reactive from tumor-bearing lymph nodes. Radiology. 1994;193:501-506.
4. Bellin MF, Roy C, Kinkel K, et al. Lymph node metastases: safety and effectiveness of MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide paticles - initial clinical experience. Radiology. 1998;207:799-808.
5. Harika L, Weissleder R, Poss K, et al. MR lymphography with a lymphotropic T1-type MR contrast agent: Gd-DTPA PGM. Magn Reson Med. 1994;33:88-92.
6. Harika L, Weissleder R, Poss K, et al. Macromolecular intravenous contrast agent for MR lymphography: characterization and efficacy studies. Radiology. 1996;198:365-370.
7. Misselwiz B, Sachse A. Interstitial MR lymphography using Gd-carrying liposomes. Acta Radiol. 1997;38(Suppl. 412):51-55.
8. Missselwitz B, Platzek J, Raduchel B, et al. Gadofluorine 8: initial experience with a new contrast medium for interstitial MR lymphography. MAGMA. 1999;8:190-195.
9. Ruehm SG, Corot C, Debatin JF. Interstitial MR lymphography with a conventional extracellular Gadolinium-based agent: assessment in rabbits. Radiology. 2001;218:664-669.
10. Ruehm SG, Schroeder T, Debatin JF. Interstitial MR lymphography with gadoterate meglumine: initial experience in humans. Radiology. 2001;220:816-821.
11. Misselwitz B, Platzek J, Weinmann H-J. MR lymphography after interstitial injection of contrast media. Lymphology. 1998;31:326-329.
12. Siefert HM, Mutzel W, Schobel C, et al. Iotasul, a water-soluble contrast agent for direct and indirect lymphography: results of preclinical investigations. Lymphology. 1980;13:150-157.
13. Witte CL, Williams WH, Witte HM. Lymphatic imaging. Lymphology. 1993;26:109-111.