Diet and abdominal autofluorescence detected by in vivo fluorescence imaging of living mice

Molecular Imaging

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 21-27

  Inoue, Yusuke ^a   Izawa, Kiyoko ^b   Kiryu, Shigeru ^b   Tojo, Arinobu ^b   Ohtomo, Kuni ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; FEEDING; FLUORESCENCE; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; IMAGE QUALITY; LIGHT EMISSION; LUMINESCENCE; MICROFLUIDICS; OPTICAL WAVEGUIDES; PURIFICATION; QUANTUM ELECTRONICS;

AUTOFLUORESCENCE (AF); FLUORESCENT PROBING; IN-VIVO; INTENSE (CO); LOW DOSE; QUANTUM DOT (CO); RETICULOENDOTHELIAL SYSTEM (RES); WHOLE BODY (WB);

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

QUANTUM DOT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; DIET; FECES; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE; HISTOLOGY; INTESTINE; MOUSE; RETICULOENDOTHELIAL SYSTEM; TIME; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

ANIMALS; DIET; FECES; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE; INTESTINES; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MONONUCLEAR PHAGOCYTE SYSTEM; QUANTUM DOTS; TIME FACTORS; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

EID: 44949199187     PISSN: 15353508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7290.2008.0003     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Rao J, Dragulescu-Andrasi A, Yao H. Fluorescence imaging in vivo: recent advances. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2007;18:17-25.
2. Weissleder R. A clearer vision for in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol 2001;19:316-7.
3. Weagle G, Paterson PE, Kennedy J, Pottier R. The nature of the chromophore responsible for naturally occurring fluorescence in mouse skin. J Photochem Photobiol B 1988;2:313-20.
4. McNally JB, Kirkpatrick ND, Hariri LP, et al. Task-based imaging of colon cancer in the Apc(Min/+) mouse model. Appl Opt 2006; 45:3049-62.
5. Holmes H, Kennedy JC, Pottier R, et al. A recipe for the preparation of a rodent food that eliminates chlorophyll-based tissue fluorescence. J Photochem Photobiol B l995;29:l99.
6. Gudgin Dickson EF, Holmes H, Jori G, et al. On the source of the oscillations observed during in vivo zinc phthalocyanine fluorescence pharmacokinetic measurements in mice. Photochem Photobiol 1995;61:506-9.
7. Troy T, Jekic-McMullen D, Sambucetti L, Rice B. Quantitative comparison of the sensitivity of detection of fluorescent and bioluminescent reporters in animal models. Mol Imaging 2004;3: 9-23.
8. Inoue Y, Izawa K, Yoshikawa K, et al. In vivo fluorescence imaging of the reticuloendothelial system using quantum dots in combination with bioluminescent tumour monitoring. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:2048-56.
9. Ballou B, Lagerholm BC, Ernst LA, et al. Noninvasive imaging of quantum dots in mice. Bioconjug Chem 2004;15:79-86.
10. Buschmann C. Variability and application of the chlorophyll fluorescence emission ratio red/far-red of leaves. Photosynth Res 2007;92:261-71.
11. Becker A, Riefke B, Ebert B, et al. Macromolecular contrast agents for optical imaging of tumors: comparison of indotricarbocyanine-labeled human serum albumin and transferrin. Photochem Photobiol 2000;72:234-41.
12. Robinson DJ, de Bruijn HS, de Wolf WJ, et al. Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy of hairless mouse skin using two-fold illumination schemes: PpIX fluorescence kinetics, photobleaching and biological effect. Photochem Photobiol 2000; 72:794-802.
13. Hansch A, Frey O, Sauner D, et al. In vivo imaging of experimental arthritis with near-infrared fluorescence. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50: 961-7.
14. Mansfield JR, Gossage KW, Hoyt CC, Levenson RM. Autofluorescence removal, multiplexing, and automated analysis methods for in-vivo fluorescence imaging. J Biomed Opt 2005;10: 41207.