Latent consideration sets and continuous demand systems

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 363-379

  Von Haefen, Roger H ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consideration sets; Demand systems; Environmental quality; Simulation

Indexed keywords

BIAS-VARIANCE TRADEOFFS; CONSIDERATION SETS; CONTINUOUS DEMAND; EMPIRICAL PROPERTIES; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; NATIONAL SURVEYS; SIMULATION; TRADITIONAL MODELS;

ECONOMICS;

DEMAND ANALYSIS; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ECONOMETRICS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 52949136313     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-008-9196-x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. DW Andrews 2001 Testing when a parameter is on the boundary of a maintained hypothesis Econometrica 69 683 734
2. M Ben-Akiva B Boccora 1995 Discrete choice models and latent consideration sets Int J Res Mark 12 9 24
3. J Chiang S Chib C Narasimhan 1999 Markov chain Monte Carlo and model of consideration set and parameter heterogeneity J Econom 89 223 248
4. A Deaton M Irish 1984 Statistical models for zero expenditures in household budgets J Public Econ 23 59 80
5. J Englin P Boxall D Watson 1998 Modeling recreation demand in a Poisson system of equations Am J Agric Econ 80 255 263
6. Fisher FM, Shell K (1968) Taste and quality change in the pure theory of the true cost-of-living index. In: Wolfe JN (ed) Value, capital and growth. Aldine, Chicago
7. Gouriéroux C, Monfort A (1996) Simulation-based econometric methods. New York, Oxford
8. S Gurmu P Trivedi 1996 Excess zeros in count models for recreation trips J Bus Econ Stat 14 4 469 477
9. Greene W (1994) Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in poisson and negative binomial regression models. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York
10. T Haab R Hicks 1997 Accounting for choice set endogeneity in random utility models of recreation demand J Environ Econ Manage 34 2 127 147
11. T Haab K McConnell 1996 Count data models and the problem of zeros in recreation demand analysis Am J Agric Econ 78 89 102
12. J Horowitz 1991 Modeling the choice of choice sets in discrete-choice random utility models Environ Plan 23 1237 1246
13. LF Lee M Pitt 1986 Microeconomic demand systems with binding non-negativity constraints: the dual approach Econometrica 54 1237 1242
14. Mäler KG (1974) Environmental economics: a theoretical inquiry. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore
15. C Manski 1977 The structure of random utility models Theory Decis 8 229 254
16. JP Neary KWS Roberts 1980 The theory of household behavior under rationing Eur Econ Rev 13 25 42
17. G Parsons DM Massey T Tomasi 2000 Familiar and favorite sites in a random utility model of beach recreation Mar Resour Econ 14 299 315
18. G Parsons A Plantinga K Boyle 2000 Narrow choice sets in a random utility model of recreation demand Land Econ 76 1 86 99
19. T Peters W Adamowicz P Boxall 1995 Influence of choice set considerations in modeling the benefits from improved water quality Water Resour Res 31 7 1781 1787
20. J Roberts P Nedungadi 1995 Studying consideration in the consumer decision process: progress and challenges Int J Res Mark 12 3 7
21. G Schwarz 1978 Estimating the dimension of a model Ann Stat 6 461 464
22. S Self K Liang 1987 Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under non-standard conditions J Am Stat Assoc 82 398 605 610
23. R Sethuraman C Cole D Jain 1994 Analyzing the effect of information format and task on cutoff search strategies J Consum Psychol 3 2 103 136
24. JS Shonkwiler WD Shaw 1996 Hurdle count-data models in recreation demand analysis J Agric Resour Econ 21 2 210 219
25. A Shocker M Ben-Akiva B Boccara P Nedungadi 1991 Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice Mark Lett 2 3 181 197
26. Swait J (1984) Incorporating constraints in discrete choice models of transportation demand. Dissertation, MIT
27. J Swait M Ben-Akiva 1987 Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation Transport Res B 21 2 91 102
28. J Swait M Ben-Akiva 1987 Empirical test of a constrained choice discrete choice model: mode choice in Sao Paulo Brazil Transport Res B 21 2 103 115
29. Train K (2003) Discrete choice analysis with simulation. Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
30. R von Haefen 2003 Incorporating observed choice into the construction of welfare measures from random utility models J Environ Econ Manage 45 2 145 165
31. R von Haefen D Phaneuf G Parsons 2004 Estimation and welfare analysis with large demand systems J Bus Econ Stat 22 2 194 205
32. QH Vuong 1989 Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses Econometrica 57 307 333
33. T Wales A Woodland 1983 Estimation of consumer demand systems with binding non-negativity constraints J Econom 21 263 285