Adenoma detection and retroscopy

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 557-559

  Barthel, James S ^a  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EDITORIAL; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPE; INTESTINE ENDOSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSCOPE; RETROSCOPY; SCREENING; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADENOMA; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; HUMANS;

EID: 77249118287     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.013     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Pickhardt P.J., Nugent P.A., Mysliwiec P.A., et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004) 352-359
2. East J.E., Saunders B.P., Burling D., et al. Surface visualization at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: effect of varying field of view and retrograde view. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 2529-2535
3. Pellisé M., Fernández-Esparrach G., Cárdenas A., et al. Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 135 (2008) 1062-1068
4. Deenadayalu V.P., Chadalawada V., and Rex D.K. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 2138-2142
5. Rex D.K., Chadalawada V., and Helper D.J. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 2000-2005
6. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2533-2541
7. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97 (2002) 1296-1308
8. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) S16-S28
9. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 873-885
10. Rex D.K. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 33-36
11. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., and Greenlaw R.L. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 (2008) 1091-1098
12. Froehlich F., Wietlisbach V., Gonvers J.J., et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 378-384
13. Harewood G.C., Sharma V.K., and de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003) 76-79
14. Lai E.J., Calderwood A.H., Doros G., et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 69 (2009) 620-625
15. Waye J.D., Russell I.H., Fleischer D.E., et al. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc (2010) 551-556