The spread of computer-assisted language learning

Language Teaching

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 66-74

  Chapelle, Carol A ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77249118206     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444809005850     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allum, P. (2002). CALL in the classroom: The case for comparative research. ReCALL 14.1, 146-166.
2. Auerbach, E. R. (1995). The politics of the ESL classroom. In J. W. Tollefson (ed.), Power and inequality in language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9-33.
3. Barnard, R.&M.Randall (1995). Evaluating coursematerials: Acontrastive study in text book trialling. System 23.3, 337-346.
4. Belz, J. A. (2001). Institutional and individual dimensions of transatlantic group work in network-based language teaching. ReCALL 13.2, 213-231.
5. Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology 7.2, 68-117.
6. Belz, J. A. & S. L. Thorne (2006). Introduction: Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education and the intercultural speaker. In J. A. Belz & S. Thorne (eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle, iixûxxv.
7. Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology 4.1, 120-136.
8. Chambers, F. (1997). Seeking consensus in coursebook evaluation. ELT Journal 5.1, 29-35.
9. Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology 2.1, 22-34.
10. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Chapelle, C. A. (2007). Challenges in evaluation of innovation: Observations fromtechnology research. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1.1, 30-45.
12. Chapelle, C. A. (2009). A hidden curriculum in language textbooks: Are beginning learners of French at U.S. universities taught about Canada The Modern Language Journal 93.2, 139-152.
13. Chapelle, C. A. & H-M. Lui (2007). Theory and research: Investigation of æauthenticÆ CALL tasks. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (eds.), CALL environments (2nd edn.). Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications, 111-130.
14. Chenoweth, N. A. & K. Murday (2003). Measuring student learning in an online French course. CALICO Journal 20.2, 285-314.
15. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Doughty, C. J. & M. H. Long (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology 7.3, 50-80.
17. Ellis, R. (1998). The evaluation of communicative tasks. In Tomlinson (ed.), 217-328.
18. Grgurovic, M. (2007).Database of comparison studies: Computer-assisted vs. classroom second/foreign language instruction. http://tesl.engl.iastate.edu: 591/comparison/main.htm.
19. Grgurovic, M., C. A. Chapelle & M. Shelley (in preparation). Effectiveness of CALL: A meta-analysis and research synthesis.
20. Hubbard, P. (2006). Evaluating CALL software. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching. San Marcos, TX: CALICO, 313-334.
21. Jamieson, J., C. A. Chapelle & S. Preiss (2005). CALL evaluation by developers, a teacher, and students. CALICO Journal 23.1, 93-138.
22. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Littlejohn, A. (1998). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse. In Tomlinson (ed.), 190-216.
24. Masuhara, H. & B. Tomlinson (2008). Materials for general English. In Tomlinson (ed.), 17-37.
25. McDonough, J. & C. Shaw (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacherÆs guide (2nd edn.). Malden,MA: Blackwell.
26. McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
27. Pederson,K.M. (1987). Research on CALL. InW. F. Smith (ed.), Modern media in foreign language education: Theory and implementation. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company, 99-132.
28. Plass, J. L., D. M. Chun, R. E. Mayer & D. Leutner (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology 90.1, 25-36.
29. Risager, K. (2007). Language and culture pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
30. Robinson, J. P., W. P. Rivers & R. D. Brecht (2006). Speaking foreign languages in the United States: Correlates, trends, and possible consequences. The Modern Language Journal 90.4, 457-472.
31. Sanaoui, R. & L. Lapkin (1992). A case study of an FEL senior secondary course integrating computer networking. Canadian Modern Language Review 48.3, 525-552.
32. Schulz, R. A. (2006). The challenge of assessing cultural understanding in the context of foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals 40.1, 9-26.
33. Scida, E. E. & R. E. Saury (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal 23.3, 517-532.
34. Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal 42.4, 237-246.
35. Tomlinson, B. (ed.) (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Tomlinson, B. (2003a). Materials evaluation. In Tomlinson (ed.) (2003b), 16-36.
37. Tomlinson, B. (ed.) (2003b). Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum.
38. Tomlinson, B. (ed.) (2008). English learning materials: A critical review. London: Continuum.
39. Tomlinson, B., B. Dat, H. Masuhara & R. Rubdy (2001). ELT courses for adults. ELT Journal 55.1, 80-101.