Operational criteria for genetically defined species: Analysis of the diversification of the small fruit-eating bats, dermanura (phyllostomidae: Stenodermatinae)

Acta Chiropterologica

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 279-288

  Solari, Sergio ^a,d   Hoofer, Steven R ^a,e   Larsen, Peter A ^a   Brown, Adam D ^a,f   Bull, Robert J ^a   Guerrero, Jose A ^b   Ortega, Jorge ^c   Carrera, Juan P ^a   Bradley, Robert D ^a   Baker, Robert J ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MORELOS   (Mexico)

^c INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL   (Mexico)

^d UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA   (Colombia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Dermanura; Genetic Species Concept; Monophyletic lineages; Morphology; Phylogenetics; Species boundaries

Indexed keywords

BAT; BIOGEOGRAPHY; BIOTA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TAXONOMY;

SOUTH AMERICA;

ARTIBEUS; AZTECA; PHYLLOSTOMIDAE; STENODERMATINAE;

EID: 77249087867     PISSN: 15081109     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3161/150811009X485521     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ANDERSEN, K. 1906. Brief diagnoses of a new genus and ten new forms of stenodermatous bats. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7, 18: 419-423.
2. ANDERSEN, K. 1908. A monograph of the chiropteran genera Uroderma, Enchistenes, and Artibeus. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1908: 204-319.
3. BAKER, R. J., and R. D. BRADLEY. 2006. Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy, 87: 643-662.
4. BAKER, R. J., S. R. HOOFER, C. A. PORTER, and R. A. VAN DEN BUSSCHE. 2003. Diversification among New World leafnosed bats: a evolutionary hypothesis and classification inferred from digenomic congruence of DNA sequences. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University, 230: 1-32.
5. BARRACLOUGH, T. G., and S. NEE. 2001. Phylogenetics and spe -ciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16: 391-399.
6. BATESON, W. 1909. Heredity and variation in modern lights. Pp. 85-101, in Darwin and modern science (A. C. SEWARD, ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 595 pp.
7. BRADLEY, R. D., and R. J. BAKER. 2001. A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome-b sequences and mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 82: 960-973.
8. BRUMFIELD, R. T., and A. P. CAPPARELLA. 1996. Historical diversification of birds in northwestern South America: a molecular perspective on the role of vicariant events. Evol u -tion, 50: 1607-1624.
9. CABRERA, A. 1958. Catalogo de los Mamiferos de America del Sur. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 'Bernardino Rivadavia'. Ciencias Zoologicas, 4: 1-307.
10. CARTER, D. C., and P. G. DOLAN. 1978. Catalogue of type specimens of Neotropical bats in selected European museums. Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University, 15: 1-136.
11. CORBET, G. B. 1997. The species in mammals. Pp. 34-356, in Species: the units of biodiversity (M. F. CLARIDGE, H. A. DAWAH, and M. R. WILSON, eds.). Chapman & Hall, Lon -don, 460 pp.
12. COYNE, J. A., and H. A. ORR. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Asso ciates, Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 545 pp.
13. CRACRAFT, J. 1985. Historical biogeography and patterns of diversification within South American areas of endemism. Pp. 49-84, in Neotropical Ornithology (P. A. BUCKLEY, M. S. FOSTER, E. S. MORTON, R. S. RIDGELY, and F. G. BUCK LEY, eds.). American Ornithological Union, Wash ing -ton, D.C., 1041 pp.
14. CRACRAFT, J. 1997. Species concepts in systematics and conservation biology: an ornithological viewpoint. Pp. 325-339, in Species: the units of biodiversity (M. F. CLARIDGE, H. A. DAWAH, and M. R. WILSON, eds.). Chapman & Hall, Lon -don, 460 pp.
15. DALQUEST, W. W. 1953. Mexican bats of the genus Artibeus. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 66: 61-66.
16. DAVIS, W. B. 1958. Review of the Mexican bats of the Artibeus 'cinereus' complex. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 71: 163-166.
17. DAVIS, W. B. 1969. A review of the small fruit bats (genus Artibeus) of Middle America. Part I. Southwestern Nat -uralist, 14: 15-29.
18. DAVIS, W. B. 1970. A review of the small fruit bats (genus Artibeus) of Middle America. Part II. Southwestern Nat -uralist, 14: 389-402.
19. DOBZHANSKY, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York, 364 pp.
20. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39: 783-791.
21. GERVAIS, M. P. 1856. Cheiropteres sud-americains. Pp. 25-28, in Animaux nouveaux ou rares de l'Amerique du Sud. Mam miferes (F. CASTTLENAU, ed.). Chez P. Bertrand, Paris, 1: 1-116.
22. HALL, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America, 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 678 pp.
23. HANDLEY, C. O., JR. 1987. New species of mammals from northern South America: fruit-eating bats, genus Artibeus Leach. Fieldiana: Zoology, 39: 163-172.
24. HERSHKOVITZ, P. 1949. Mammals of northern Colombia, pre -liminary report no. 5: bats (Chiroptera). Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 99: 429-454.
25. HILLIS, D. M., and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity, 83: 189-195.
26. HOOFER, S. R., S. SOLARI, P. A. LARSEN, R. D. BRADLEY, and R. J. BAKER. 2008. Phylogenetics of the fruit-eating bats (Phyl lostomidae: Artibeina) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech Uni versity, 277: 1-15.
27. HUELSENBECK, J. P., and F. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17: 745-755.
28. KALKO, E. K. V., and C. O. HANDLEY, JR. 1994. Evolution, biogeography, and description of fruit-eating bat, genus Arti -beus Leach (1821), from Panama. Zeitschrift fur Sauge tier -kunde, 59: 257-273.
29. KOOPMAN, K. F. 1978. Zoogeography of Peruvian bats with special emphasis on the role of the Andes. American Museum Novitates, 2652: 1-33.
30. KOOPMAN, K. F. 1982. Biogeography of the bats of South Amer -ica. Pp. 273-302, in Mammalian biology in South America (M. A. MARES and H. H. GENOWAYS, eds.). Special Pub li -cations, Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, 6, 1-539.
31. LARSEN, P. A., S. R. HOOFER, M. C. BOZEMAN, S. C. PEDERSEN, H. H. GENOWAYS, C. J. PHILLIPS, D. E. PUMO, and R. J. BAKER. 2007. Phylogenetics and phylogeography of the Arti beus jamaicensis complex based on cytochrome-b DNA sequences. Journal of Mammalogy, 88: 712-727.
32. LEACHE, A. D., and T. W. REEDER. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Systematic Biology, 51: 44-68.
33. LIM, B. K., M. D. ENGSTROM, T. E. LEE, JR., J. C. PATTON, and J. W. BICKHAM. 2004. Molecular differentiation of large species of fruit-eating bats (Artibeus) and phylogenetic relationships based o the cytochrome b gene. Acta Chiro ptero -logica, 6: 1-12.
34. LIM, B. K., M. D. ENGSTROM, H. H. GENOWAYS, F. M. CATZE -FLIS, K. A. FITZGERALD, S. L. PETERS, M. DJOSETRO, S. BRANDON, and S. MITRO. 2005. Results of the Alcoa Found ation-Suriname Expeditions. XIV. Mammals of Browns berg Nature Park, Suriname. Annals of Carnegie Mu s eum, 74: 225-274.
35. LONGMIRE, J. L., M. MALTBIE, and R. J. BAKER. 1997. Use of 'lysis buffer' in DNA isolation and its implications for museum collections. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University, 163: 1-3.
36. MADDISON, D. R., and W. R. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade 4. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
37. MARQUES-AGUIAR, S. A. 1994. A systematic review of the large species of Artibeus Leach, 1821 (Mammalia: Chiroptera), with some phylogenetic inferences. Boletim, Museu Paraen -se Emilio Goeldi, Zoologia, 10: 3-83.
38. MAYDEN, R. L. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. Pp. 381-424, in Species: the units of biodiversity (M. F. CLARIDGE, H. A. DAWAH, and M. R. WILSON, eds.). Chapman & Hall, Lon -don, 460 pp.
39. MILLER, G. S., JR. 1902. Twenty new American bats. Pro -ceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Phila del -phia, 1902: 389-412.
40. MULLER, H. J. 1939. Reversibility in evolution considered from the standpoint of genetics. Biological Reviews of the Cam -bridge Philosophical Society, 14: 261-280.
41. OSGOOD, W. H. 1916. Mammals of the Collins-Day South Amer ican expedition. Field Museum of Natural History, Zool ogy, 10: 199-216.
42. OXFORD MOLECULAR GROUP PLC. 1998. AssemblyLIGN 1.0.9. Oxford Molecular Group PLC, Oxford.
43. PATTERSON, B. D., V. PACHECO, and M. V. ASHLEY. 1992. On the origins of the western slope region of endemism: systematics of fig-eating bats, genus Artibeus. Memorias del Museo de Historia Natural (Lima), 21: 189-205.
44. PATTERSON, B. D., V. PACHECO, and S. SOLARI. 1996. Distrib u -tion of bats along an altitudinal gradient in the Andes of south-eastern Peru. Journal of Zoology (London), 240: 637-658.
45. POSADA, D., and K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14: 817-818.
46. REDONDO, R. A. F., L. P. S. BRINA, R. F. SILVA, A. D. DITCH -FIELD, and F. R. SANTOS. 2008. Molecular systematics of the genus Artibeus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Molecular Phy l ogenetics and Evolution, 49: 44-58.
47. REID, F. A. 1997. A field guide to the mammals of Central Amer ica and southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press, New York. xiv 334 pp.
48. SAUSSURE, M. H. 1860. Note sur quelques mammiferes du Mex ique. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie, 2, 12: 428-431.
49. SIMMONS, N. B. 2005. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 312-529, in Mam -m al species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edition (D. E. WILSON and D. M. REEDER, eds.). The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2142 pp.
50. SOLARI, S., and R. J. BAKER. 2007. Review of 'Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (eds.). 2005. Mammal species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference'. Journal of Mammalogy, 88: 824-830.
51. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, Massachusetts.
52. TAMSITT, J. R., D. VALDIVIESO, and J. HERNANDEZ-CAMACHO. 1964. Bats of the Bogota Savanna, Colombia, with notes on altitudinal distribution of Neotropical bats. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 12: 107-115.
53. THOMAS, O. 1893. On some mammals from Central Peru. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1893: 333-341.
54. THOMAS, O. 1897. Description of new bats and rodents from Amer ica. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6, 20: 544-553.
55. THOMAS, O. 1901. New Myotis, Artibeus, Sylvilagus, and Meta -chirus from Central and South America. Annals and Maga -zine of Natural History, 7, 7: 541-545.
56. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, and D. G. HIGGINS. 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 24: 4876-4882.
57. VAN DEN BUSSCHE, R. A., R. J. BAKER, H. A. WICHMAN, and M. J. HAMILTON. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of Steno -der ma tini bat genera: congruence of data from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10: 944-959.
58. VAN DEN BUSSCHE, R. A., J. L. HUDGEONS, and R. J. BAKER. 1998. Phylogenetic accuracy, stability, and congruence. Re -la tionships within and among the New World bat genera Arti beus, Dermanura, and Koopmania. Pp. 59-71, in Bat bio logy and conservation (T. H. KUNZ and P. A. RACEY, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., xiv 365 pp.
59. WILSON, D. E., and D. M. REEDER (eds.). 2005. Mammal spe cies of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2142 pp.