Evaluation of the consensus of four peptide identification algorithms for Tandem mass spectrometry based proteomics

Journal of Proteomics and Bioinformatics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 39-47

  Dagda, Ruben K ^a   Sultana, Tamanna ^b   Lyons Weiler, James ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Consensus approach; Consensus methods; Peptide identification; Phenyx; Proteomics

Indexed keywords

EID: 77149166342     PISSN: None     EISSN: 0974276X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4172/jpb.1000119     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bafna V, Edwards N (2001) SCOPE: a probabilistic model for scoring tandem mass spectra against a peptide database. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 17: S13-21.
2. Balgley BM, Laudeman T, Yang L, Song T, Lee CS (2007) Comparative Evaluation of Tandem MS Search Algorithms Using a Target-Decoy Search Strategy. Mol Cell Proteomics 6: 1599-1608.
3. Brosch M, Swamy S, Hubbard T, Choudhary J (2008) Comparison of Mascot and X!Tandem performance for low and high accuracy mass spectrometry and the development of an adjusted mascot threshold. Mol Cell Proteomics 7: 962-970.
4. Chamrad DC, Körting G, Stühler K, Meyer HE, Klose J, et al. (2004) Evaluation of algorithms for protein identification from sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 4: 619-628.
5. Colinge J, Masselot A, Giron M, Dessingy T, Magnin J (2003) OLAV: towards high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry data identification. Proteomics 3:1454-1463.
6. Craig R, Beavis RC (2004) TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20: 1466-1467.
7. Eng JK, McCormack AL, Yates JR III (1994) An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 5: 976-989.
8. Kapp EA, Schutz F, Connolly LM, Chakel JA, Meza JE, et al. (2005) An evaluation, comparison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available MS/MS search algorithms: sensitivity and specificity of analysis. Proteomics 5: 3475-3490.
9. Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R (2002) Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 74: 5383-5392.
10. MacCoss MJ, Wu CC, Yates JR III (2002) Probability-based validation of protein identifications using a modified SEQUEST algorithm. Anal Chem 74: 5593-5599.
11. Magnin J, Masselot A, Menzel C, Colinge J (2004) OLAV- PMF: a novel scoring scheme for high-throughput peptide mass fingerprinting. J Proteome Research 3: 55-60.
12. Moore RE, Young MK, Lee TD (2002) Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 12: 378-386.
13. Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R (2003) A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 75: 4646-4658.
14. Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20: 3551-3567.
15. Resing K, Meyer-Arendt K, Mendoza AM, Aveline-wolf LD, Jonscher KR, et al. (2004) Improving reproducibility and sensitivity in identifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 76: 3556-3568.
16. Rudnick PA, Wang Y, Evans E, Lee CS, Balgley BM (2005) Large scale analysis of MASCOT results using a Mass Accuracy-based Threshold (MATH) effectively improves data interpretation. J Proteome Research 4: 1353-1360.
17. Sadygov RG, Cociorva D, Yates JR III (2004) Large-scale database searching using tandem mass spectra: looking up the answer in the back of the book. Nature Methods 1: 195-202.
18. Shilov IV, Seymour SL, Patel AA, Loboda A, Tang WH, et al. (2007) The Paragon Algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 6: 1638-1655.
19. Sultana T, Jordan R, Lyons-Weiler J (2009) Optimization of the use of consensus methods for the detection and putative identification of peptides via mass spectrometry using protein standard mixtures. J Proteomics Bioinform 2: 263-273.