Developing standards for distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 122, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 2203-2214

  Mills, David M ^a   Feeney, M Patrick ^a   Drake, Eli J ^a   Folsom, Richard C ^a   Sheppard, Lianne ^a   Seixas, Noah S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; CALIBRATION; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; OPTIMIZATION;

DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION (DPOAE); EMISSION AMPLITUDE; LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION MEASUREMENTS; RECALIBRATION;

ACOUSTIC WAVES;

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEASUREMENT; MOLECULAR PROBE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CALIBRATION; EAR CANAL; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PITCH PERCEPTION; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 34848907953     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2770543     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). (2004). " Specification for audiometers., " ANSI S3.6-2004, New York.
2. Keefe, D. H., Ling, R., and Bulen, J. C. (1992). " Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 470-485.
3. Kummer, P., Janssen, T., Hulin, P., and Arnold, W. (2000). " Optimal L1 - L2 primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans., " Hear. Res. 146, 47-56.
4. Lukashkin, A. N., and Russell, I. J. (1999). " Analysis of the f2 - f1 and 2 f1 - f2 distortion components generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer: Dependence on the amplitudes of the primaries and feedback gain., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2661-2668.
5. Mills, D. M. (2002). " Interpretation of standard distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements in light of the complete parametric response., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 1545-1560.
6. Mills, D. M. (2003). " Differential responses to acoustic damage and furosemide in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission measures., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 914-924.
7. Mills, D. M. (2006). " Determining the cause of hearing loss: Differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses., " Ear Hear. 27, 508-525.
8. Mills, D. M., Feeney, M. P., and Gates, G. A. (2007). " Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: Normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements., " Ear Hear. 28 (6).
9. Mills, D. M., and Rubel, E. W (1994). " Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection., " Hear. Res. 77, 183-199.
10. Neely, S. T., and Gorga, M. P. (1998). " Comparison between intensity and pressure as measures of sound level in the ear canal., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2925-2934.
11. Seixas, N. S., Goldman, B., Sheppard, L., Neitzel, R., Norton, S., and Kujawa, S. G. (2005). " Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices., " Occup. Environ. Med. 62, 309-317.
12. Seixas, N. S., Kujawa, S. G., Norton, S., Sheppard, L., Neitzel, R., and Slee, A. (2004). " Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults., " Occup. Environ. Med. 61, 899-907.
13. Siegel, J. H. (1994). " Ear-canal standing waves and high-frequency sound calibration using otoacoustic emission probes., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2580-2597.
14. Voss, S. E., and Shera, C. A. (2004). " Simultaneous measurement of middle-ear input impedance and forward/reverse transmission in cat., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2187-2198.
15. Zhang, M., and Abbas, P. J. (1997). " Effects of middle ear pressure on otoacoustic emission measures., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1032-1037.