Effects of sample size on the noise floor and distortion product otoacoustic emissions

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 93-102

  Beattie, Randall C ^a   Ireland, Adam ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distortion product; Otoacoustic emissions; Sample size

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NOISE REDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE; STIMULUS;

EID: 0033902599     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/010503900424507     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American National Standards Institute American national standard specification for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1989). New York: ANSI, 1989.
2. Arlinger S. Technical aspects on stimulation, recording and signal processing. Scand Audiol 1981; Suppl 13: 41-53.
3. Baer JE, Hall JW. Effects of nonpathologic factors on otoacoustic emissions. Hear J 1992; 45: 17-23.
4. Beattie RC, Jones RL. Effects of relative levels of the primary tones on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing subjects. Audiology 1998; 37: 187-97.
5. Beattie RC, Zipp JA, Schaffer CA, Silzel KL. Effects of sample size on the latency and amplitude of the auditory evoked response. Am J Otolaryngol 1992; 13: 55-67.
6. Brown AM. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs, and gerbils. Hear Res 1987; 31: 25-39.
7. Brown AM, Kemp DT. Suppressibility of 2F1-F2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29-37.
8. Bruning JL. Kintz BL Computational handbook of statistics, 3rd edn. Glenview, Illinois: Scott. Foresman & Co., 1987.
9. Coats AC. Instrumentation. In: Moore EJ, ed. Basis of auditory brainstem evoked responses. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1983; 197-220.
10. Durrant JD. Distortion-product OAE analysis: is it ready for broad clinical use? Hear J 1992; 45: 42-5.
11. Elberling C, Don M. Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 187-97.
12. Elberling C, Don M. Threshold characteristics of the human auditory brain stem response. J Acoust Soc Amer 1987; 81: 115-21.
13. Glasscock ME, Jackson CG, Josey AF The ABR handbook: auditory brainstem response, 2nd edn. New York: Theme Medical Publishers, 1987.
14. Grason-Stadler Grason-Stadler GSI 60 DPOAE - Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions System User Manual. Milford. NH: GSI Grason-Stadler, 1996; 15.
15. Hall JW Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston; Allyn and Bacon, 1992.
16. Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK. Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Amer 1989; 85: 220-29.
17. Hood LJ, Berlin CI Auditory evoked potentials. Austin: Pro-ed Inc., 1986.
18. Jacobson JT. An overview of the auditory brainstem response. In: Jacobson JT, ed. The auditory brainstem response. San Diego: College Hill Press, 1985; 3-12.
19. Jacobson JT, Hyde ML. An introduction to auditory evoked potentials. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of clinical audiology. 3rd edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985; 496-533.
20. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386-91.
21. Kemp DT. Evidence of mechanical non linearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 224: 37-45.
22. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1986; 22: 95-104.
23. Kemp DT, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown AM. Acoustic emission cochleography - practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1986; Suppl 15: 71-96.
24. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Harris FP, Stagner BB, Hawkins MD, Martin GK. Distortion product emissions in humans I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 3-14.
25. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 144-54.
26. Lonsbury-Martin B, McCoy M, Whitehead M, Martin G. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 11-22.
27. Martin GK, Ohlms LA, Franklin DJ, Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL. Distortion product emissions in humans III. Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 30-42.
28. Mehrens WA, Lehmann IJ Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
29. Musiek FE, Baran JA. Comparison of standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions procedures. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 370-4.
30. Nielsen LH, Popelka GR, Rasmussen AN, Osterhammel PA. Clinical significance of probe tone frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 159-64.
31. Norton SJ, Stover SJ. Otoacoustic emissions: an emerging clinical tool. In: Katz J, ed, Handbook of clinical audiology, 4th edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994; 448-62.
32. Picton TW, Linden RD, Hamel G, Maru JT. Aspects of averaging. Semin Hear 1983; 4: 327-40.
33. Picton TW, Smith AD. The practice of evoked potential audiometry. Otolaryngol Clin N Amer 1978; 11: 263-82.
34. Picton TW, Stapells DR, Campbell KB. Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem. J Otolaryngol 1981; 9: 1-41.
35. Popelka GR, Karzon RK, Clary RA. identification of noise sources that influence distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements in human neonates. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 319-28.
36. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Amer 1991; 89: 2053-5.
37. Sun X, Kim DO, Jung MD, Randolph KJ. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss in humans: comparison of unequal- and equal-level stimuli. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105: 982-90.
38. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Relevance of animal models to the clinical application of otoacoustic emissions. Semin Hear 1992; 13: 81-101.
39. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. The influence of noise on the measured amplitudes of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 1097-102.
40. Whitehead ML, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. J Acoust Soc Amer 1995; 97: 2346-58.
41. Wong PK, Bickford RG. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: the use of noise estimate. Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 50: 25-34.