Floral formulae updated for routine inclusion in formal taxonomic descriptions

Taxon

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 241-250

  Prenner, Gerhard ^a   Bateman, Richard M ^a,b   Rudall, Paula J ^a  

^a JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Antirrhinum; Arabidopsis; Caesalpinioideae; Floral diagram; Floral formula; Floral morphology; Flower; Lecythidaceae; Orchidaceae; Protologue; Taxonomic description

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; FLORAL TRAIT; ONTOGENY; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

ANTIRRHINUM; ARABIDOPSIS; CAESALPINIOIDEAE; LECYTHIDACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; ORCHIDACEAE;

EID: 77149156638     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.591022     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alberch, P., Gould, S.J., Oster, G.F. & Wake, D.B. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5: 296-317.
2. Bachelier, J.B. & Endress, P.K. 2009. Comparative floral morphology and anatomy of Anacardiaceae and Burseraceae (Sapindales), with a special focus on gynoecium structure and evolution. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 159: 499-571.
3. Barrett, S.C.H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Rev. Genet. 3: 274-284.
4. Bateman, R.M. 1994. Evolutionary-developmental change in the growth architecture of fossil rhizomorphic lycopsids: Scenarios constructed on cladistic foundations. Biol. Rev. 69: 527-597.
5. Bateman, R.M. 2009. What's in a name? [Parts 1 and 2]. J. Hardy Orchid Soc. 6: 53-63, 88-99.
6. Bateman, R.M. In press. The perils of addressing long-term challenges in a short-term world: Making descriptive taxonomy predictive. In: Hodkinson, T., Jones, M.B., Waldren, S. & Parnell, J. (eds.), Climate change and systematics. Systematics Association special volume 79. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
7. Bateman, R.M. & Rudall, P.J. 2006. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Using naturally occurring terata to distinguish the possible from the impossible in orchid floral evolution. Aliso 22: 481-496.
8. Burrows, G. 2009. The virtual floral formula. Pl. Sci. Bull. 55: 149-150.
9. Cassel, F.P. 1820. Morphonomia botanica: sive Observationes circa proportionem et evolutionem partium plantarum. Colonia Agrippina [Cologne]: M. DuMont-Schauberg.
10. Chen, S.-C. 1965. A primitive new orchid genus Tangtsinia and its meaning in phylogeny. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 16: 82-85.
11. Doyle, J.J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17: 144-163.
12. Eichler, A.W. 1875. Blüthendiagramme construiert und erläutert, 1. Theil. Leipzig: Engelmann.
13. Eichler, A.W. 1878. Blüthendiagramme construiert und erläutert, 2. Theil. Leipzig: Engelmann.
14. Ellstrand, N.C. 1983. Floral formula inconstancy within and among plants and populations of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Bot. Gaz. 144: 119-123.
15. Endress, P.K. 1992. Evolution and floral diversity: The phylogenetic surroundings of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 153: S106-S122.
16. Endress, P.K. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
17. Endress, P.K. 1999. Symmetry in flowers: Diversity and evolution. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 160 (6 Suppl.): S3-S23.
18. Endress, P.K. 2001. Evolution of floral symmetry. Curr. Opin. Pl. Biol. 4: 86-91.
19. Goebel, K. 1887. Outlines of classification and special morphology of plants. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Gould, S.J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap.
21. Grisebach, A. 1854. Grundriss der systematischen Botanik für akademische Vorlesungen. Göttingen: Verlag der Dietrichschen Buchhandlung.
22. Judd, W.S., Campbell, C.S., Kellogg, E.A., Stevens, P.F. & Donoghue, M.J. 2007. Plant systematics: A phylogenetic approach, 3rd ed. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
23. Kocyan, A. & Endress, P.K. 2001. Floral structure and development of Apostasia and Neuwiedia (Apostasioideae) and their relationships to other Orchidaceae. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 162: 847-867.
24. Leins, P. & Erbar, C. 2008. Blüte und Frucht: Morphologie, Entwicklungsgeschichte, Phylogenie, Funktion und Ökologie, 2. Aufl. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
25. Luo, D., Carpenter, R., Vincent, C., Copsey, L. & Coen, E. 1996. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383: 794-799.
26. Martius, C.F. 1828. Über die Architectonik der Blüthen. Isis (Oken) 21: 522-529.
27. McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H.M., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D.L., Marhold, J., Nicolson, D.H., Prado, J., Silva, P.C., Skog, J.E., Wiersema, J.H. & Turland, N.J. 2006. International code of botanical nomenclature (Vienna Code): Adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress; Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Regnum Vegetabile 146. Ruggell: Gantner.
28. Méndez, M. & Gómez, J.M. 2006. Phenotypic gender in Hormathophylla spinosa (Brassicaceae): A perfect hermaphrodite with tetradynamous flowers, is variable. Pl. Syst. Evol. 262: 225-237.
29. Meyerowitz, E.M. 1994. The genetics of flower development. Sci. Amer. 271: 56-65.
30. Meyerowitz, E.M., Bowman, J.L., Brockman, L.L., Drews, G.N., Jack, T., Sieburth, L.E. & Weigel, D. 1991. A genetic and molecular model for flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development Suppl. 1: 157-167.
31. Mondragón-Palomino, M. & Theissen, G. 2009. Why are orchid flowers so diverse? Reduction of evolutionary constraints by paralogues of class B floral homeotic genes. Ann. Bot. 104: 583-594.
32. Nutt, P., Zierrnann, J.G., Hintz, M., Neuffer, B. & Theissen, G. 2006. Capsella as a model system to study the evolutionary relevance of floral homeotic mutants. Pl. Syst. Evol. 259: 217-235.
33. Prance, G.T. & Mori, S.A. 1977. What is Lecythis? Taxon 26: 209-222.
34. Prance, G.T. & Mori, S.A. 1979. Lecythidaceae, part 1, The actinomorphic-flowered New World Lecythidaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 21. New York: New York Botanical Garden.
35. Prenner, G. 2004a. New aspects in floral development of Papilionoideae: Initiated but suppressed bracteoles and variable initiation of sepals. Ann. Bot. 93: 537-545.
36. Prenner, G. 2004b. The asymmetric androecium in Papilionoideae (Leguminosae): Definition, occurrence, and possible systematic value. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 165: 499-510.
37. Prenner, G., Box, M.S., Cunniff, J. & Rudall, P.J. 2008. The branching stamens of Ricinus and the homologies of the angiosperm stamen fascicle. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 169: 735-744.
38. Prenner, G. & Klitgaard, B.B. 2008. Towards unlocking the deep nodes of Leguminosae: Floral development and morphology of the enigmatic Duparquetia orchidacea (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioi-deae). Amer. J. Bot. 95: 1349-1365.
39. Prenner, G., Vergara-Silva, F. & Rudall, P.J. 2009. The key role of morphology in modelling inflorescence architecture. Trends Pl. Sci. 14: 302-309.
40. Ronse De Craene, L.P. 2002. Floral development and anatomy of Pentadiplandra (Pentadiplandraceae): A key genus in the identification of floral morphological trends in core Brassicales. Canad. J. Bot. 80: 443-459.
41. Rudall, P.J. & Bateman, R.M. 2002. Roles of synorganisation, zygomorphy and heterotopy in floral evolution: The gynostemium and labellum of orchids and other lilioid monocots. Biol. Rev. 77: 403-441.
42. Rudall, P.J. & Bateman, R.M. 2004. Evolution of zygomorphy in monocot flowers: Iterative patterns and developmental constraints. New Phytol. 162: 25-44.
43. Sachs, J. 1873. Lehrbuch der Botanik nach dem gegenwaertigen Stand der Wissenschaft, 3. Aufl. Leipzig: Engelmann.
44. Sattler, R. 1973. Organogenesis of flowers: A photographic text-atlas. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
45. Savolainen, V., Cowan, R.S., Vogler, A.P., Roderick, G.K. & Lane, R. 2005. Towards writing the encyclopaedia of life: An introduction to DNA barcoding. Philos. Trans., Ser. B 360: 1805-1811.
46. Soltis, D.E., Fishbein, M. & Kuzoff, R.K. 2003. Reevaluating the evolution of epigyny: Data from phylogenetics and floral ontogeny. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 164 (5 Suppl): S251-S264.
47. Soltis, D.E. & Hufford, L. 2002. Ovary position diversity in Saxifragaceae: Clarifying the homology of epigyny. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 163: 277-293.
48. Stützel, T. 2002. Botanische Bestimmungsübungen. Stuttgart: Ulmer.
49. Tautz, D., Arctander, P., Minelli, A., Thomas, R.H. & Vogler, A.P. 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 70-74
50. Theissen, G., Becker, A., Winter, K.-U., Münster, T., Kirchner, C. & Saedler, H. 2002. How the land plants learned their floral ABCs: The role of MADS-box genes in the evolutionary origin of flowers. Pp. 173-205 in: Cronk, Q.C.B., Bateman, R.M. & Hawkins, J.A. (eds.), Developmental genetics and plant evolution. London: Taylor & Francis.
51. Tian, X.-H., Zhao, L., Ren, Y. & Zhang, X.-H. 2007. Number of floral organs in Circaeaster agrestis (Circaeasteraceae) and possible homeosis among floral organs. Pl. Syst. Evol. 265: 259-265.
52. Tsou, C.-H. & Mori, S.A. 2007. Floral organogenesis and floral evolution of the Lecythidoideae (Lecythidaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 94: 716-736.
53. Tucker, S.C. 1998. Floral ontogeny in legume genera Petalostylis, Labichea, and Dialium (Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae): A series in floral reduction. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 184-208.
54. Tucker, S.C. 2000. Floral development in tribe Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Amherstia, Brownea, and Tamarindus. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1385-1407.
55. Tucker, S.C. 2002. Floral ontogeny of Cercis (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Cercideae): Does it show convergence with papilionoids? Int. J. Pl. Sci. 163: 75-87.
56. Weberling, F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Trans. R.J. Pankhurst from the original of 1981. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.