The branching stamens of Ricinus and the homologies of the angiosperm stamen fascicle

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 169, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 735-744

  Prenner, Gerhard ^a   Box, Mathew S ^a,b   Cunniff, Jennifer ^a,c   Rudall, Paula J ^a  

^a JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Androecium; Euphorbiaceae; Evolution; Fascicles; Malpighiales; Ricinus; Stamen; Telome theory

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; EVOLUTION; ONTOGENY; PHYLOGENY; POLYANDRY;

DALECHAMPIA; EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIACEAE; HYPERICUM; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MALPIGHIALES; MERCURIALIS; RICINUS (ANGIOSPERM); RICINUS COMMUNIS;

EID: 47649113078     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/588071     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) 1998 An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 18:531-553.
2. _ 2003 An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc 141:399-399.
3. Arber EAN, J Parkin 1907 The origin of angiosperms. J Linn Soc 38:29-80.
4. Baillon H 1858 Étude générale du groupe des Euphorbiacées. Masson, Paris.
5. Bharathan G, NR Sinha 2001 The regulation of compound leaf development. Plant Physiol 127:1533-1538.
6. Bianchini M, E Pacini 1996 Explosive anther dehiscence in Ricinus communis L. involves cell wall modifications and relative humidity. Int J Plant Sci 157:739-745.
7. Bodmann H 1937 Zur Morphologie der Blütenstände von Euphorbia. Oesterr Bot Zeit 86:241-279.
8. Caris P, LP Ronse Decraene, E Smets, D Clinckemaillie 2002 The uncertain systematic position of Symplococos (Symplocaceae): evidence from a floral ontogenetic study. Int J Plant Sci 163:67-74.
9. Carmona MAJ, P Cubas, JM Martínez-Zapater 2002 VFL, the grapevine FLORICAULA/LEAFY ortholog, is expressed in meristematic regions independently of their fate. Plant Physiol 130:68-77.
10. Chase MW, S Zmarzty, MD Lledó, KJ Wurdack, SM Swensen, MF Fay 2002 When in doubt, put it in Flacourtiaceae: a molecular phylogenetic analysis based on plastid rbcL DNA sequences. Kew Bull 57:141-181.
11. Coen ES, EM Meyerowitz 1991 The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353:31-37.
12. D'Arcy WG, RC Keating, eds 1996 The anther: form, function and phylogeny. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Davis CC, MW Chase 2004 Elatinaceae are sister to Malpighiaceae; Peridiscaceae belong to Saxifragales. Am J Bot 91:262-273.
14. Delpino F 1889 Anemofilia a scatto delle antere presso il Ricinus communis. Malpighia 3:337-338.
15. Eames AJ 1931 The vascular anatomy of the flower with refutation of the theory of carpel polymorphism. Am J Bot 18:147-188.
16. _ 1961 Morphology of the angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York.
17. Endress PK 1997 Relationships between floral organization, architecture, and pollination mode in Dillenia (Dilleniaceae). Plant Syst Evol 206:99-118.
18. _ 2006 Angiosperm floral evolution: morphological developmental framework. Adv Bot Res 44:1-61.
19. Fisher ES, R Rutishauser 1990 Leaves and epiphyllous shoots in Chisocheton (Meliaceae): a continuum of woody leaf and stem axes. Can J Bot 68:2316-2328.
20. Friis EM, JA Doyle, PK Endress, Q Leng 2003 Archaefructus: angiosperm precursor or specialized early angiosperm? Trends Plant Sci 8:369-373.
21. Froebe HA, N Magin 1993 Pattern analysis in the inflorescence of Dalechampia L. (Euphorbiaceae). Bot Jahrb Syst 115:27-44.
22. George WL, O Shifriss 1967 Interspersed sexuality in Ricinus. Genetics 57:347-356.
23. Hufford L 1998 Early development of androecia in polystemonous Hydrangeaceae. Am J Bot 85:1057-1067.
24. Khanam K, MS Zahur 1962 Development, growth and morphological nature of the staminal truss in Ricinus communis. Biologia 8:163-178.
25. Lacroix CR, R Sattler 1994 Expression of shoot features in early leaf development of Murraya paniculata (Rutaceae). Can J Bot 72:678-687.
26. Lam HJ 1948 Classification and the new morphology. Acta Biotheor 8:107-154.
27. Leins P 1964a Das zentrifugale und zentripetale Androecum. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 77:22-26.
28. _ 1964b Die frühe Blütenentwicklung von Hypericum hookerianum Wight et Arn. und H. aegypticum L. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 77:112-123.
29. Leins P, C Erbar 1994 Flowers in Magnoliidae and the origin of flowers in other subclasses of the angiosperms. II. The relationships between flowers of Magnoliidae, Dilleniidae, and Caryophyllidae. Plant Syst Evol Suppl 8:208-218.
30. Meeuse ADJ 1966 Fundamentals of phytomorphology. Ronald, New York.
31. Melville R 1963 A new theory of the angiosperm flower. II. The androecium. Kew Bull 17:1-63.
32. Michaelis P 1924 Blütenmorphologische Untersuchungen an den Euphorbiaceen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Phylogenie der Angiospermenblüte. Bot Abh 3:1-150.
33. Moline PM, D Les, CT Philbrick, A Novelo R, E Pfeifer, R Rutishauser 2006 Comparative morphology and molecular systematics of Podostemum (including Crenias): American river-weeds (Podostemaceae). Bot Jahrb Syst 126:427-476.
34. Nandi OI 1998 Floral development and systematics of Cistaceae. Plant Syst Evol 212:107-134.
35. Pax F, K Hoffmann 1919 Euphorbiaceae-Acalypheae-Ricininae. In A Engler, ed. Das Pflanzenreich IV (IX-XI, 147). Engelmann, Leipzig.
36. Payer JB 1857 Traité d'organogénie camparée de la fleur. Masson, Paris.
37. Prenner G, PJ Rudall 2007 Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia and its allies: exploring the organ-flower-inflorescence boundary. Am J Bot 94:1612-1629.
38. Radcliffe-Smith A 2001 Genera Euphorbiacearum. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
39. Ronse Decraene LP, EF Smets 1987 The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial characters oligomery and polymery in the Magnoliophytina. Nord J Bot 7:239-253.
40. _ 1992 Complex polyandry in the Magnoliatae: definition, distribution, and systematic value. Nord J Bot 12:621-649.
41. Rutishauser R 1997 Structural and developmental diversity in Podostemaceae (river weeds). Aquat Bot 57:29-70.
42. Rutishauser R, V Grob, E Pfeifer 2008 Plants are used to having identity crises. Chapter 11 in A Minelli, G Fusco, eds. Evolving pathways: key themes in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Rutishauser R, M Grubert 1999 The architecture of Mourera fluviatilis (Podostemaceae): developmental morphology of inflorescences, flowers, and seedlings. Am J Bot 86:907-922.
44. Salisbury EJ 1926 Floral construction in the Helobiales. Ann Bot 40:419-445.
45. Satina S, AF Blakeslee 1941 Periclinal chimeras in Datura stramonium in relation to development of leaf and flower. Am J Bot 28:862-871.
46. Sattler R 1972 Centrifugal primordial inception in floral development. Pages 170-178 in YS Murty, BM Johri, HYM Ram, TM Varghese, eds. Advances in plant morphology. Sarita Prakashan, Meerut.
47. _ 1973 Organogenesis of flowers. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
48. Sattler R, R Rutishauser 1997 The fundamental relevance of morphology and morphogenesis to plant research. Ann Bot 80:571-582.
49. Sattler R, V Singh 1978 Floral organogenesis of Echinodorus amazonicus Rataj and floral construction of the Alismatales. Bot J Linn Soc 77:141-156.
50. Savolainen V, MW Chase, SB Hoot, CM Morton, DE Soltis, C Bayer, MF Fay, AY de Bruijn, S Sullivan, YL Qiu 2000 Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst Biol 49:306-362.
51. Sessions A, MF Yanofsky, D Weigel 2000 Cell-cell signaling and movement by the floral transcription factors LEAFY and APETALA1. Science 289:779-781.
52. Shifriss O 1956 Sex instability in Ricinus. Genetics 41:265-280.
53. Sokoloff D, A Oskolski, M Remizowa, M Nuraliev 2007 Flower structure and development in Tupidanthus calyptratus (Araliaceae): an extreme case of polymery among asterids. Plant Syst Evol 268:209-234.
54. Stebbins GL, RD Hoogland 1976 Species diversity, ecology and evolution in a primitive angiosperm genus: Hibbertia (Dilleniaceae). Plant Syst Evol 125:139-154.
55. Steinbrinck JL 1910 Über die physikalische Verwandtschaft der pollenschleudernden Ricinus Antheren mit den sporenschleudernden Farn- und Selaginella-Kapseln. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 28:2-7.
56. Sun G, DL Dilcher, S Zheng, Z Zhou 1998 In search of the first flower: a Jurassic angiosperm, Archaefructus, from northeast China. Science 282:1692-1695.
57. Sun G, Q Ji, DL Dilcher, S Zheng, KC Nixon, X Wang 2002 Archaefructaceae, a new basal angiosperm family. Science 296:899-904. Thomas HH 1931 The early evolution of angiosperms. Ann Bot 45:647-672.
58. _ 1932 The old morphology and the new. Proc Linn Soc 145:17-46.
59. Tokuoka T, H Tobe 2006 Phylogenetic analyses of Malpighiales using plastid and nuclear DNA sequences, with particular reference to the embryology of Euphorbiaceae sens. str. J Plant Res 119:599-616.
60. Tsou CH 1998 Early floral development of Camellioideae (Theaceae). Am J Bot 85:1531-1547.
61. Tucker SC, P Bernhardt 2000 Floral ontogeny, pattern formation, and evolution in Hibbertia and Adrastaea (Dilleniaceae). Am J Bot 87:1915-1936.
62. Uhl NW 1976 Developmental studies in Ptychosperma (Palmae). II. The staminate and pistillate flowers. Am J Bot 63:97-109.
63. Van der Pijl L 1952 The stamens of Ricinus. Phytomorphology 2:130-132.
64. Van Heel WA 1966 Morphology of the androecium in Malvales. Blumea 13:177-394.
65. Venkata Rao C, T Ramalakshmi 1968 Floral anatomy of Euphorbiaceae. I. Some non-cyathium taxa. J Indian Bot Soc 47:278-300.
66. von Goethe JW 1790 Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu erklären. Ettinger, Gotha.
67. Webster GL 1994 Classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 81:3-32.
68. Weigel D, J Alvarez, DR Smyth, MF Yanofsky, EM Meyerowitz 1992 LEAFY controls floral meristemidentity in Arabidopsis. Cell 69:843-859.
69. Wilson CL 1937 The phylogeny of the stamen. Am J Bot 24:686-699.
70. _ 1942 The telome theory and the origin of the stamen. Am J Bot 29:759-764.
71. _ 1953 The telome theory. Bot Rev 19:417-437.
72. Wurdack KJ, P Hoffmann, MW Chase 2005 Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using plastid rbcL and trnL-F DNA sequences. Am J Bot 92:1397-1420.
73. Wurdack KJ, P Hoffmann, R Samuel, A de Bruijn, M van der Bank, MW Chase 2004 Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Phyllanthaceae (Phyllanthoideae pro parte, Euphorbiaceae sensu lato) using plastid rbcL DNA sequences. Am J Bot 91:1882-1900.
74. Zimmermann W 1930 Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen: ein Überblick über Tatsachen und Probleme. Fischer, Jena.