Methodological developments for probabilistic risk analyses of socio-technical systems

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability

Volumn 223, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 313-332

  Leger A ^a   Weber, P ^a   Levrat, E ^a   Duval, C ^b   Farret, R ^c   Iung, B ^a  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN AUTOMATIQUE DE NANCY   (France)

^b EDF R AND D   (France)

^c INSTITUT NATIONAL DE L ENVIRONNEMENT INDUSTRIEL ET DES RISQUES INERIS   (France)

Author keywords

Bayesian networks; Bow tie method; Human reliability; Organiz ational factors; Risk analysis; Socio technical systems

Indexed keywords

BOW-TIE METHODS; CRITICAL SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKERS; HUMAN ACTIONS; HUMAN RELIABILITY; PROBABILISTIC RISK ANALYSIS; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; SYSTEM KNOWLEDGE; SYSTEM RESOURCES; SYSTEM RISK; TECHNICAL PROCESS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; INFERENCE ENGINES; INTELLIGENT NETWORKS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY FACTOR;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 77149142579     PISSN: 1748006X     EISSN: 17480078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/1748006XJRR230     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. A Villemeur, Reliability, availability, maintainability and safety assessment. Volume 1: methods and techniques (New York: Wiley 1992)
2. A. D Swain, H. E Guttman, Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications NUREG/CR-1278, 1983 (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission)
3. E Hollnagel, Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) (New York: Elsevier 1988)
4. M Barriere, D Bley, S Cooper, J Forester, A Kolaczkowski, W Luckas, G Parry, A Ramey-Smith, C Thompson, D Whitehead, J Wreathall, Technical basis and implementation guideline for a technique for human event analysis (ATHEANA) NUREG-1624, Rev. 1, 2000 (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission)
5. C Perrow, Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies (: (Princeton University Press) 1990)
6. K. H Roberts, Managing high reliability organizations California Mgmt Rev. 32 (4) (1990): 101-114
7. I Svedung, J Rasmussen, Graphic representation of accident scenarios: mapping system structure and the causation of accidents Safety Sci. 40 (2002): 397-417
8. F. R Chevreau, J. L Wybo, D Cauchois, Organizing learning processes on risks by using the bow-tie representation J. Hazardous Mater. 130 (2006): 276-283
9. F Delmotte, A socio-technical framework for the integration of human and organizational factors in project management and risk analysis (2003) MSC Thesis, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
10. I. A Papazoglou, I-Risk: development of an integrated technical and management risk methodology for chemical installations J. Loss Prevention in the Process Ind. 16 (6) (2003): 575-591
11. M. C Kim, P. H Seong, A computational method for probabilistic safety assessment of I&C systems and human operators in nuclear power plants Reliability Engng System Safety 91 (2006): 580-593
12. S. F Galán, A Mosleh, J. M Izquierdo, Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants through canonical probabilistic models Reliability Engng System Safety 92 (2007): 1131-1138
13. S. J Lee, M. C Kim, P. H Seong, An analytical approach to quantitative effect estimation of operation advisory system based on human process using the Bayesian belief network Reliability Engng System Safety 93 (2008): 567-577
14. A Gregoriades, A Sutcliffe, Workload prediction for improved design and reliability of complex systems Reliability Engng System Safety 93 (2008): 530-549
15. G. G Preckshot, Method for performing diversity and defense-in-depth analyses of reactor protection systems (: 1994) (Division of Reactor Controls and Human Factors, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission)
16. F. V Jensen, Bayesian networks and decision graphs (New York: Springer 2001)
17. L Von Bertalanffy, General system theory: foundations, developments, applications (New York: G. Braziller 1968)
18. A Léger, Methodology for a probabilistic risk analysis of socio-technical systems. In INSIGHT, The Best of France Forum Académique et Robafis 11 (2008): 25-26
19. C Forest, T Aven Ed., J. E Vinnem Ed., Probabilistic assessment of potential major accidents: Estimating reliability of safety barriers (Abingdon: Taylor and Francis Group 2007): pp. 27-34
20. M. E Paté-Cornell, D. M Murphy, Human and management factors in probabilistic risk analysis: the SAM approach and observations from recent applications Reliability Engng System Safety 53 (1996): 115-126
21. A Léger, A safety barriers-based approach for the risk analysis of socio-technical systems. In 17th IFAC World Congress, Seoul, South Korea, 2008
22. A Léger, Risk analysis of complex socio-technical systems by using Bayesian Network modeling In 4th Workshop on Advanced control and diagnosis, Nancy, France, 2006
23. C Duval, T Aven Ed., J. E Vinnem Ed., Choice of a risk analysis method for complex socio-technical systems (2007)
24. R Farret, Epistemological perspective in the modelling process of an industrial system integrating technical and organisational dimensions In the 15th Annual Conference SRA-Europe, Innovation and Technical Progress: Benefit without Risk?, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2006
25. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14121: safety of machinery, principles of risk assessment (Geneva: ISO 1999)
26. H Andersen, ARAMIS User Guide. The European Commission - Community Research: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development. Project under the 5th Framework Programme, 2004
27. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61511: functional safety, safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector, all parts (: (International Electrotechnical Commission) 2004)
28. AFNOR (Association Française de Normalisation) EN 13306: maintenance terminology, 2001 (AFNOR)
29. A Léger, Modeling of human and organizational impacts for system risk analyses (2008)
30. E Hollnagel, Human reliability analysis: context and control (Boston: Academic Press 1993)
31. J Reason, Human error (: (Cambridge University Press) 1990)
32. E Hollnagel, D. D Woods, N Leveson, Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts (Hampshire, UK: Ashgate 2006)
33. Research and Technology Organization, The human factor in system reliability - is human performance predictable? In Human Factors and Medicine Panel (HFM) Workshop, 2000, p. iii
34. R. C Schank, Conceptual information processing (: (Elsevier) 1975)
35. K Lewin, D Cartwright Ed., Field theory in social science (New York: Harper & Row 1951)
36. K Marais, N Dulac, N Leveson, Beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: the need for an alternative approach to safety in complex systems. In Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Symposium, 2004
37. S Pierlot, Y Dien, T Aven Ed., J. E Vinnem Ed., From organizational factors to an organizational diagnosis of the safety (2007)
38. B. A Turner, N. F Pidgeon, Man-made disasters (: (Butterworth Heinemann) 1997)
39. S. D Sagan, The limits of safety Organisations, Accidents and Nuclear Weapons (: (Princeton University Press) 1993)
40. J Reason, Managing the risks of organizational accidents (: (Ashgate) 1997)
41. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), Identification and assessment of organizational factors related to the safety of NPPs. State of the art report, 1999
42. G Beaumont, Organizational factors - their definition and influence on nuclear safety: final report. Commission of the European communities, Fourth framework program on nuclear fission safety, Report AMM-ORFA (99)-R06, 2000
43. E Seville, Building organisational resilience: A summary of key research findings. Research report: resilient organizations programme, 2006
44. F. V Jensen, An introduction to Bayesian networks (London: Editions UCL Press 1996)
45. H Langseth, L Portinale, Bayesian networks in reliability Reliability Engng System Safety 92 (2007): 92-108
46. J. G Torres-Toledano, L. E Sucar, Bayesian networks for reliability analysis of complex systems. IBERAMIA98, LNAI 1484, 1998, pp. 195-206
47. A Bobbio, Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks Reliability Engng System Safety 71 (2001): 249-260
48. P Weber, Dynamic Bayesian networks model to estimate process availability (2002)
49. P Weber, L Jouffe, Reliability modelling with dynamic Bayesian networks In 5th IFAC Symposium SAFEPROCESS03, 2003, pp. 57-62
50. H Boudali, J. B Dugan, A discrete-time Bayesian network reliability modeling and analysis framework Reliability Engng System Safety 87 (2005): 337-349
51. P Weber, L Jouffe, Complex system reliability modelling with dynamic object oriented Bayesian networks (DOOBN) Reliability Engng System Safety 91 (2006): 149-162
52. P Weber, P Munteanu, L Jouffe, Dynamic Bayesian networks modeling the dependability of systems with degradation and exogenous constraints In 11th IFAC symposium INCOM04, Salvador-Bahia, Brazil, 2004
53. D Embrey, Using influence diagrams to analyse and predict failures in safety critical systems (2002)
54. P Trucco, A Bayesian belief network modeling of organizational factors in risk analysis: a case study in maritime transportation Reliability Engng System Safety 93 (2008): 845-856
55. A Onisko, M. J Druzdzel, H Wasyluk, Learning Bayesian network parameters for small data sets: application of Noisy-OR gates Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 27 (2001): 165-182
56. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9001: quality management systems - requirements (Geneva: ISO 2000)
57. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14001. Environmental management systems - requirements with guidance for use (Geneva: ISO 2004)
58. OHSAS, OHSAS 18001: Occupational health and safety management systems - specifications Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series (UK: OHAS 1999)
59. C. A Pollino, Parameterisation and evaluation of a Bayesian network for use in an ecological risk assessment Environ. Modeling and Software XX (2006): 1-13