Proportional and nonproportional transfer of movement sequences

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1626-1647

  Wilde, Heather ^a   Shea, Charles H ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARM; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARM; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SERIAL LEARNING; SPACE PERCEPTION; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33746802504     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210500303755     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Benguerel, A. P., & Cowan, H. A. (1974). Coarticulation of upper lip protrusion in French. Phonetica, 30, 41-55.
2. Buchanan, J. J. (2004). Learning a single limb multijoint coordination pattern: The impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer. Experimental Brain Research, 156, 39-54.
3. Buchanan, J. J., Park, J.-H., Rye, R. U., & Shea, C. H. (2003). Discrete and cyclical units of action in a mixed target pair aiming task. Experimental Brain Research, 150, 473-489.
4. Buchanan, J. J., Park, J.-H., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Systematic scaling of target width: Planning, feed-back, and dynamics. Neuroscience Letters, 367(3), 317-322.
5. Criscimagna-Hemminger, S. E., Donchin, O., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Shadmehr, R. (2003). Learned dynamic of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 168-176.
6. Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (1978). Skiff acquisition: An event approach with special reference to searching for the optimum of a function of several variables. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 1-40). New York: Academic.
7. Gelfand, I. M., & Tsetlin, M. (1971). Mathematical modeling of mechanisms of the central nervous system. In I. M. Gelfand, V. Gurfinkel, S. Fomin, & M. Tsetlin (Eds.), Models of the structural-functional organization of certain biological systems (pp. 1-22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Gentner, D. R., Larochelle, S., & Grudin, J. T. (1988). Lexical, sublexical, and peripheral effects in skilled typewriting. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 524-548.
9. Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448-458.
10. Jordan, M. I. (1995). The organization of action sequences: Evidence from a releaming task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 179-192.
11. Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17-30.
12. Kelso, J. A. S. (1981). Contrasting perspectives on order and regulation in movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 437-457). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Kelso, J. A. S., Putnam, C. A., & Goodman, D. (1983). On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 347-375.
14. Kelso, J. A. S., & Zanone, P.-G. (2002). Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer across different effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 69-81.
15. Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
16. Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1015-1027.
17. Klapp, S. T. (1996). Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 13-35). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
18. Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., Bruechert, L., & Little, M. (2002). Modeled auditory information enhances relative timing learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 299-308.
19. Langley, D. J., & Zelaznik, H. N. (1984). The acquisition of time properties associated with a sequential motor skill Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 275-301.
20. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112-136). New York Wiley.
21. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-12.
22. Panzer, S., Wilde, H., & Shea, C. H. (in press). The learning of two similar complex movement sequences: Proactive and retroactive effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior.
23. Park, J.-H., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Effector independence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 253-270.
24. Park, J.-H., & Shea, C. H. (2003). Effect of practice on effector independence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 33-40.
25. Park, J., & Shea, C. H. (2005). The detection and utilization of sequence information: Influence on response structure and effector transfer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 387-419.
26. Park, J.-H., Wilde, H., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Part-whole practice of movement sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 51-61.
27. Pew, R. W. (1974). Levels of analysis in motor control. Brain Research, 71, 393-400.
28. Povel, D., & Collard, R. (1982). Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. Acta Psychologica, 52, 107-123.
29. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., Girouard, Y., &Dugas, C. (1987). On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive practice. Human Movement Science, 6, 181-199.
30. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., & Levesque, L. (1992). A sensorimotor basis for motor learning - Evidence indicating specificity of practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 557-575.
31. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1990). On choosing between movement sequences: Comments on Rose (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 439-444.
32. Rosenbaum, D. A., Hindorff, V., & Munro, E. M. (1986). Programming of rapid finger sequences. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 64-71). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
33. Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86-102.
34. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Saltzman, E. (1984). A motorprogram editor. In W. Prinz & A. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes VIII (pp. 93-106). Berlin: Springer.
35. Rosenbaum, D. A., Saltzman, E., & Kingman, A. (1984b). Choosing between movement sequences. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes (pp. 119-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Schmidt, RA. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
37. Schmidt, R. A. (1985). The search for invariance in skilled movement behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 188-200.
38. Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
39. Shapiro, D. (1977, March). Bilateral transfer of a motor program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, Seattle, WA, USA.
40. Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (2005). Schema theory: Critical re-appraisal and re-evaluation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 85-101.
41. Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., & Turock, D. L. (1990). Hierarchical control in the execution of action sequences: Tests of two invariance properties. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 3-55). Hillsdale; NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117-152). New York: Academic Press.
43. Verwey, W. B. (1994). Evidence for the development of concurrent processing in a sequential key pressing task. Acta Psychologica, 85, 245-262.
44. Verwey, W. B. (1996). Buffer loading and chunking in sequential key pressing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception, and Performance, 22, 544-562.
45. Verwey, W. B. (2001). Concatenating familiar movement sequences: The versatile cognitive processor. Acta Psychologica, 106, 69-95.
46. Verwey, W. B., & Wright, D. L. (2004). Effector-independent and effector-dependent learning in a discrete sequence production task. Psychological Research, 68, 64-70.
47. Whitacre, C. A., & Shea, C. H. (2000). Performance and learning of generalized motor programs: Relative (GMP) and absolute (parameter) errors. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 163-175.
48. Whitacre, C., & Shea, C. H. (2002). The role of practice variability in retention, parameter transfer, and effector transfer Relative (GMP) and absolute (parameter) errors. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 47-57.
49. Wulf, G. (1992). Reducing knowledge of results can produce context effects in movements of the same class. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 22, 71-84.
50. Wulf, G., & Lee, T. D. (1993). Contextual interference in movements of the same class: Differential effects on program and parameter learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 254-263.
51. Wulf, G., Lee, T. D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 362-369.
52. Wulf, G., &Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomics Bulletin and Review, 9, 185-211.