Conformational freedom of proteins and the maximal probability of sets of orientations

Inverse Problems

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Sgheri, Luca ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMATIONAL FREEDOM; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TENSORS; N-TERMINAL DOMAINS; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; RELATIVE ORIENTATION; ROTATION GROUP;

INVERSE PROBLEMS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; PROBABILITY; PROTEINS; ROTATION; TENSORS;

MAGNETIC DOMAINS;

EID: 76949107353     PISSN: 02665611     EISSN: 13616420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/3/035003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Al Hashimi H M, Valafar H, Terrel M, Zartler E R, Eidsness M K and Prestegard J H 2000 Variation of molecular alignment as a means of resolving orientational ambiguities in protein structures from dipolar couplings J. Magn. Reson. 143 402-6
2. Allegrozzi M, Bertini I, Janik M B L, Lee Y-M, Liu G and Luchinat C 2000 Lanthanide induced pseudocontact shifts for solution structure refinements of macromolecules in shells up to 40 from the metal ion J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 4154-61
3. Bertini I, Del Bianco C, Gelis I, Katsaros N, Luchinat C, Parigi G, Peana M, Provenzani A and Zoroddu M A 2004 Experimentally exploring the conformational space sampled by domain reorientation in calmodulin Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 6841-6
4. Bertini I, Gupta K J, Luchinat C, Parigi G, Peana M, Sgheri L and Yuan J 2007 Paramagnetism-based NMR restraints provide maximum allowed probabilities for the different conformations of partially independent protein domains J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 12786-94
5. Bertini I, Janik M B L, Lee Y-M, Luchinat C and Rosato A 2001 Magnetic susceptibility tensor anisotropies for a lanthanide ion series in a fixed protein matrix J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 4181-8
6. Bertini I, Luchinat C and Parigi G 2002 Paramagnetic constraints: an aid for quick solution structure determination of paramagnetic metalloproteins Concepts Magn. Reson. 14 259-86
7. Bertini I, Luchinat C and Parigi G 2002 Magnetic susceptibility in paramagnetic NMR Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 40 249-73
8. Bertini I, Luchinat C and Piccioli M 2001 Paramagnetic probes in metalloproteins. Turning limitations into advantages Methods Enzymol. 339 314-40
9. Blackwell D and Girshick M A 1979 Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions (London: Dover)
10. Borovkov M and Savyolova T 2007 The computational approaches to calculate normal distributions on the rotation group J. Appl. Cristallography 40 449-55
11. Branden C and Tooze J 1998 Introduction to Protein Structure 2nd edn (London: Garland Science)
12. Evans M, Hastings N and Peacock B 2000 Statistical Distributions 3rd edn (New York: Wiley)
13. Fenchel W 1929 ber Krümmung und Windung geschlossener Raumkurven Math. Ann. 101 238-52
14. Fisher C K, Zhang Q, Stelzer A and Al Hashimi H M 2008 Ultrahigh resolution characterization of domain motions and correlations by multialignment and multireference residual dipolar coupling NMR J. Phys. Chem. B 112 16815-22
15. Gardner R, Longinetti M and Sgheri L 2005 Reconstruction of orientations of a moving protein domain from paramagnetic data Inverse Problems 21 879-98
16. Huang Y J and Montelione G T 2005 Structural biology: proteins flex to function Nature 438 36-7
17. Ikegami T, Verdier L, Sakhaii P, Grimme S, Pescatore B, Saxena K, Vogtherr M, Fiebig K M and Griesinger C 2004 Novel techniques for weak alignment of proteins in solution using a chemical tags coordinating lanthanide ions J. Biomol. NMR 29 339-49
18. Koradi R, Billeter M and Wüthrich K 1996 MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures J. Mol. Graph. 14 51-5
19. Kuffner J J 2004 Effective sampling and distance metrics for 3D rigid body path planning Proc. 2004 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
20. Longinetti M, Luchinat C, Parigi G and Sgheri L 2006 Efficient determination of the most favoured orientations of protein domains from paramagnetic NMR data Inverse Problems 22 1485-502
21. Longinetti M, Parigi G and Sgheri L 2002 Uniqueness and degeneracy in the localization of rigid structural elements in paramagnetic proteins J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 8153-69
22. Longinetti M, Sgheri L and Sottile F 2010 Convex hulls of orbits and orientations of a moving protein domain Discrete Comput. Geom. 43 54-77
23. Meiler J, Prompers J J, Peti W, Griesenger C and Brüshweiler R 2001 Model-free approach to the dynamic interpolation of residual dipolar coupling in globular proteins J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 6098-107
24. Phelps R R 2001 Lectures on Choquet's Theorem 2nd edn (New York: Springer)
25. Reay J R 1965 Generalizations of a theorem of Carathéodory Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 54 50
26. Schneider R 1993 Convex bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
27. Schneider R and Weil W 1992 Integralgeometrie (Stuttgart: B G Teubner)
28. Selkoe D J 2003 Folding proteins in fatal ways Nature 426 900-4
29. Silhavy M 1997 The Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Continuous Media (New York: Springer)
30. Tolman J R, Al Hashimi H M, Kay H M and Prestegard J H 2001 Dynamic analysis of residual dipolar coupling data for proteins J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 1416-24
31. Tolman J R, Flanagan J M, Kennedy M A and Prestegard J H 1995 Nuclear magnetic dipole interactions in field-oriented proteins: information for structure determination in solution Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92 9279-83
32. Weisstein E W 1998 CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics (Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall)