Initiation and termination of integration in a decision process

Neural Networks

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 322-333

  Larsen, Tobias ^a   Bogacz, Rafal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Choice; Decision making; Neural integrator; Optimality sequential sampling

Indexed keywords

BASAL GANGLIA; CORTICAL AREAS; DECISION PROCESS; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FEED FORWARD; INTEGRATION PROCESS; NEURAL INTEGRATORS; OPTIMALITY; OPTIMALITY-SEQUENTIAL SAMPLING; SEQUENTIAL SAMPLING;

DECISION MAKING; LIFE CYCLE;

INTEGRATION;

ARTICLE; BASAL GANGLION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTOR CONTROL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 76849109295     PISSN: 08936080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alexander G.E., Crutcher M.D., and DeLong M.R. Basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits - parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, "prefrontal" and "limbic" functions. Progress in Brain Research 85 (1990) 119-144
2. Anderson J.R. The adaptive character of thought (1990), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
3. Averbeck B.B., Chafee M.V., Crowe D.A., and Georgopoulos A.P. Parallel processing of serial movements in prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 20 (2002) 13172-13177
4. Baum C.W., and Veeravalli V.V. A sequential procedure for multihypothesis testing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 40 6 (1994) 1994-2007
5. Belovsky G.E. Herbivore optimal foraging: A comparative test of three models. American Naturalist 124 (1984) 97-115
6. Bogacz R., and Gurney K. The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions. Neural Computation 19 (2007) 442-477
7. Bogacz R., Brown E., Moehlis J., Holmes P., and Cohen J.D. The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 700-765
8. Bogacz R., Usher M., Zhang J., and McClelland J.L. Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: Multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B 362 (2007) 1655-1670
9. Britten K.H., Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T., and Movshon J.A. Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals. Visual Neuroscience 10 (1993) 1157-1169
10. Brown E., Gao J., Holmes P., Bogacz R., Gilzenrat M., and Cohen J.D. Simple neural networks that optimize decisions. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 15 3 (2005) 803-826
11. Bullock D. Adaptive neural models of queuing and timing in fluent action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 8 (2004) 426-433
12. Burle B., Vidal F., Tandonnet C., and Hasbroucq T. Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks. Brain and Cognition 56 (2004) 153-164
13. Chevalier G., Vacher S., Deniau J.M., and Desban M. Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions. i. the striato-nigral influence on tecto-spinal/tecto-diencephalic neurons. Brain Research 334 (1985) 215-226
14. Churchland A.K., Kiani R., and Shadlen M.N. Decision-making with multiple alternatives. Nature Neuroscience 11 6 (2008) 693-702
15. Deniau J.M., and Chevalier G. Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions. ii. The striato-nigral influence on thalamocortical cells of the ventromedial thalamic nucleus. Brain Research 334 (1985) 227-233
16. Dragalin V.P., Tartakovsky A.G., and Veeravalli V.V. Multihypothesis sequential probability ratio tests-part 1: Asymptotic optimality. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 45 7 (1999) 2448-2461
17. Frank M.J. Hold your horses: A dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making. Neural Networks 19 (2006) 1120-1136
18. Gold J.I., and Shadlen M.N. Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 1 (2001) 10-16
19. Gold J.I., and Shadlen M.N. Banburismus and the brain: Decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron 36 (2002) 299-308
20. Gurney K., Prescott T.J., and Redgrave P. A computational model of action selection in the basal ganglia. i. A new functional anatomy. Biological Cybernetics 84 (2001) 401-410
21. Huk A.C., and Shadlen M.N. Neural activity in macaque parietal cortex reflects temporal integration of visual motion signals during perceptual decision making. The Journal of Neuroscience 25 45 (2005) 10420-10436
22. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39 (1984) 341-350
23. Kiani R., Hanks T.D., and Shadlen M.N. Bounded integration in parietal cortex underlies decisions even when viewing duration is dictated by the environment. The Journal of Neuroscience 28 12 (2008) 3017-3029
24. Kim J.-N., and Shadlen M.N. Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque. Nature Neuroscience 2 2 (1999) 176-185
25. LaBerge D.A. A recruitment theory of simple behaviour. Psychometrika 27 (1962) 375-396
26. Mazurek M.E., Roitman J.D., Ditterich J., and Shadlen M.N. A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. Cerebral Cortex 13 11 (2003) 1257-1269
27. McMillen T., and Holmes P. The dynamics of choice among multiple alternatives. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 50 (2006) 30-57
28. Niwa M., and Ditterich J. Perceptual decisions between multiple directions of visual motion. The Journal of Neuroscience 28 17 (2008) 4435-4445
29. Olshausen B.A., and Field D.J. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381 (1996) 607-609
30. Osborne L.C., Bialek W., and Lisberger S.G. Time course of information about motion direction in visual area MT of macaque. The Journal of Neuroscience 24 13 (2004) 3210-3222
31. Pike R. Stochastic models of choice behaviour: Response probabilities and latencies of finite markov chain systems. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 21 (1966) 161-182
32. Ratcliff R. A theory for memory retrieval. Psychological Review 85 (1978) 59-108
33. Ratcliff R., and McKoon G. The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation 20 (2008) 873-922
34. Ratcliff R., and Smith P.L. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review 111 2 (2004) 333-367
35. Redgrave P., Prescott T.J., and Gurney K. The basal ganglia: A vertebrate solution to the selection problem?. Neuroscience 89 4 (1999) 1009-1023
36. Roitman J.D., and Shadlen M.N. Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. The Journal of Neuroscience 22 21 (2002) 9475-9489
37. Salinas E. How behavioral constraints may determine optimal sensory representations. PLoS Biology 12 (2006) e387
38. Samejima K., Ueda Y., Doya K., and Kimura M. Representation of action-specific reward values in the striatum. Science 310 November (2005) 1337-1340
39. Sato T., and Schall J.D. Pre-excitatory pause in frontal eye field responses. Experimental Brain Research 139 July (2001) 53-58
40. Schall J.D. Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2 (2001) 33-42
41. Shadlen M.N., and Newsome W.T. Motion perception: Seeing and deciding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 January (1996) 628-633
42. Shadlen M.N., and Newsome W.T. Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 86 (2001) 1916-1936
43. Shepherd G.M. The synaptic organization of the brain. 5th ed. (2004), Oxford University Press
44. Soetens E., and Notebaert W. Response monitoring and expectancy in random serial RT tasks. Acta Psychologica 119 (2005) 189-216
45. Stafford, T., Humphries, M. D., & Chambers, J. M. (2005). The neural circuitry required for decision making by evidence accumulation. In Computational cognitive neuroscience conference (pp. V-62) November. Accompanying poster can be found at: http://www.spinsn.group.shef.ac.uk/spinsn/PDFs/Stafford2005.pdf
46. Thompson K.G., Hanes D.P., Bichot N.P., and Schall J.D. Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology 76 6 (1996) 4040-4055
47. Usher M., and McClelland J.L. On the time course of perceptual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 550-592
48. Vickers D. Evidence for an accumulator of psychophysical discrimination. Ergonomics 13 1 (1970) 37-58
49. Wald A. Sequential Analysis (1947), Wiley, New York
50. Wald A., and Wolfowitz J. Optimum character of the sequential probability ratio test. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19 (1948) 326-339
51. Wang X.J. Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits. Neuron 36 5 (2002) 955-968
52. Williams Z.M., Neimat J.S., Cosgrove G.R., and Eskander E.N. Timing and direction selectivity of subthalamic and pallidal neurons in patients with Parkinson disease. Experimental Brain Research 162 4 (2005) 407-416
53. Wong K.-F., Huk A.C., Shadlen M.N., and Wang X.-J. Neural circuit dynamics underlying accumulation of time-varying evidence during perceptual decision making. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 1 November (2007)