Foundations for the Future

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 807-815

  Kim, ChanMin ^a   Lee, JungMi ^a   David Merrill, M ^a,b   Michael Spector, J ^a   van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G ^c  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Core reference: A reference that is of central interest to researchers in a particular area and generally considered to be a primary source of data or information; core references are indicated by an asterisk in the reference section of each chapter in this Handbook.; Keyword: A word or phrase that is critically important to a topic area or which has a particular definition important for understanding issues and further discussion.

Indexed keywords

EID: 76849095872     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880869-62     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Craig, S. D., Graesser, A. C., Sullins, J., and Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. J. Educ. Media, 29(3), 241-250.
2. Dörner, D. (1996). The Logic of Failure: Why Things Go Wrong and What We Can Do to Make Them Right (R. Kimber and R. Kimber, trans.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.*
3. Hume, D. (1777/1910). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, http://eserver.org/18th/hume-enquiry.html.
4. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 48(4), 63-85. *
5. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educ. Psychol., 38 (1), 23-31.
6. Kim, Y. and Baylor, A. (2006). A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 54(6), 569-596.
7. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problembased, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ. Psychol., 46(2), 75-86.*
8. Klein, J. D., Spector, J. M., Grabowski, B., and de la Teja, I. (2004). Instructor Competencies: Standards for Face-to-Face, Online and Blended Settings. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
9. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 50(3), 43-59.*
10. Milrad, M., Spector, J. M., and Davidsen, P. I. (2002). Model facilitated learning. In Learning and Teaching with Technology: Principles and Practices, edited by S. Naidu, pp. 13-27. London: Kogan Page.
11. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: what is it and why is it? In Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, edited by C. M. Reigeluth, pp. 3-36. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
12. Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., and Foxon, M. with Roberts, R. C., Spannaus, T., and Spector, J. M. (2001). Instructional Design Competencies: The Standards, 3rd ed. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
13. Seel, N. M. (2003). Model centered learning and instruction. Technol. Instruct. Cogn. Learn., 1(1), 59-85.*
14. Seel, N. M., Al-Diban, S., and Blumschein, P. (2000). Mental models and instructional planning. In Integrated and Holistic Perspectives on Learning, Instruction and Technology: Understanding Complexity, edited by M. Spector and T. M. Anderson, pp. 129-158. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Spector, J. M. (2001). Philosophical implications for the design of instruction. Instruct. Sci., 29(4), 381-402.
16. Spector, J. M. (2006). A methodology for assessing learning in complex and ill-structured task domains. Innov. Educ. Teaching Int., 43(2), 109-120.
17. Spector, J. M. and Anderson, T. M., Eds. (2000). Integrated and Holistic Perspectives on Learning, Instruction and Technology: Understanding Complexity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.*
18. Spector, J. M. and Koszalka, T. A. (2004), The DEEP (Dynamic and Enhanced Evaluation of Problem Solving) Methodology for Assessing Learning in Complex Domains, NSF EREC 03-542 Final Report, http://idde.syr.edu/NSF-DEEP/.
19. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.*
20. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. and Kirschner, P. A. (2007). Ten Steps to Complex Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
21. Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.