Traveler segmentation strategy with nominal variables through correspondence analysis

Transport Policy

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 183-190

  Diana, Marco ^a   Pronello, Cristina ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Classification; Correspondence analysis; Mode choice; Non metric variables; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

ITALY; NOVARA; PIEDMONT [ITALY];

EID: 76849089841     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adler T., Falzarano C.S., and Spitz G. Modeling service trade-offs in air itinerary choices. Transportation Research Record 1915 (2005) 20-26
2. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 2 (1991) 179-211
3. Anable J. 'Complacent car addicts' or 'aspiring environmentalists'? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy 12 1 (2005) 65-78
4. Beckman J.D., and Goulias K.G. Immigration, residential location, car ownership, and commuting behavior: a multivariate latent class analysis from California. Transportation 35 5 (2008) 655-671
5. Beimborn E.A., Greenwald M.J., and Jin X. Accessibility, connectivity, and captivity: impacts on transit choice. Transportation Research Record 1835 (2003) 37-45
6. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (1985), The MIT Press, Cambridge
7. Ben-Akiva M., Walker J., Bernardino A.T., Gopinath D.A., Morikawa T., and Polydoropoulu A. Integration of choice and latent variable models. In: Mahmassani H.S. (Ed). In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges (2002), Pergamon, Oxford 431-470
8. Benzécri J.-P. Correspondence Analysis Handbook (1992), Marcel Dekker, New York
9. Berg H.Y., Gregersen N.P., and Laflamme L. Typical patterns in road-traffic accidents during driver training-an explorative Swedish national study. Accident Analysis & Prevention 36 4 (2004) 603-608
10. Bhat C. An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel. Transportation Science 31 1 (1997) 34-48
11. Bierlaire, M. (2003) BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. Proceedings of the Third Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona.
12. Bierlaire, M. (2008) Estimation of Discrete Choice Models with BIOGEME 1.6. Available at 〈http://transp-or.epfl.ch/page63023.html〉.
13. Bock H.H. Probabilistic models in cluster analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 23 1 (1996) 5-28
14. Bock H.H. Probabilistic aspects in classification. In: Hayashi C., Oshumi N., Yajima K., Tanaka Y., Bock H.H., and Baba Y. (Eds). Data Science, Classification and Related Methods (1998), Springer, Berlin 3-21
15. Cools M., Moons E., Janssens B., and Wets G. Shifting towards environment-friendly modes: profiling travelers using Q-methodology. Transportation 36 4 (2009) 437-453
16. De Witte A., Macharis C., Lannoy P., Polain C., Steenberghen T., and Van de Walle S. The impact of "free" public transport: the case of brussels. Transportation Research A 40 8 (2006) 671-689
17. Diana M. Making the "primary utility of travel" concept operational: a measurement model for the assessment of the intrinsic utility of reported trips. Transportation Research A 42 3 (2008) 455-474
18. Diana M., and Mokhtarian P.L. Grouping travelers on the basis of their different car and transit levels of use. Transportation 36 4 (2009) 455-467
19. Diana M., and Mokhtarian P.L. Desire to change one's multimodality and its relationship to the use of different transport means. Transportation Research F 12 2 (2009) 107-119
20. Dobson R., and Tischer M.L. Perceptual market segmentation technique for transportation analysis. Transportation Research Record 673 (1978) 145-152
21. Elgar A., and Bekhor S. Car-rider segmentation according to riding status and investment in car mobility. Transportation Research Record 1894 (2004) 109-118
22. Fontaine H., and Gourlet Y. Pedestrian accidents in France: a typological analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention 29 3 (1997) 303-312
23. Fowkes A.S. Recent developments in stated preference techniques in transport research. In: de J., and Ortuzar D. (Eds). Stated Preference Modelling Techniques, PRTC (2000) 37-52
24. Fujii S., and Kitamura R. What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of attitude change. Transportation 30 1 (2003) 81-95
25. Gensch D.H., and Torres P.T. Perceived-difference segmentation model for mass transit marketing. Transportation Research Record 765 (1980) 16-22
26. Golob T.F., and Hensher D.A. The trip chaining activity of Sydney residents: a cross-section assessment by age group with a focus on seniors. Journal of Transport Geography 15 4 (2007) 298-312
27. Golob T.F., and Recker W.W. A method for relating type of crash to traffic flow characteristics on urban freeways. Transportation Research A 38 1 (2004) 53-80
28. Greenacre M.J. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis (1984), Academic Press, London
29. Greenacre M.J. Correspondence Analysis in Practice. second ed. (2007), Chapman & Hall, Boca Baton
30. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., and Black W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis. fifth edition (1998), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
31. Hensher D.A., and Golob T.F. Searching for policy priorities in the formulation of a freight transport strategy: a canonical correlation analysis of freight industry attitudes. Transportation Research E 35 4 (1999) 241-263
32. Janssens, D., Wets, G., Brijs, T., Vanhoof, K., 2007. The development of a segmentation scheme for the evaluation and prediction of activity-travel sequences. Paper presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
33. Jensen M. Passion and heart in transport-a sociological analysis on transport behavior. Transport Policy 6 1 (1999) 19-33
34. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., and Swait J.D. Cross validity and external validity of SP models. Stated Choice Methods-Analysis and Application (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp. 354-381
35. Mokhtarian P.L., and Salomon I. How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research A 35 8 (2001) 695-719
36. Přibyl A. Clustering of activity patterns using genetic algorithms. In: Hoffmann F., Köppen M., Klawonn F., and Roy R. (Eds). Soft Computing (2005), Methodologies and Applications, Springer, Berlin 37-52
37. Salomon I., and Ben-Akiva M. Life-style segmentation in travel-demand analysis. Transportation Research Record 879 (1982) 37-45
38. Shiftan Y., Outwater M.L., and Zhou Y.S. Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation. Transport Policy 15 3 (2008) 186-195
39. Sohn K., and Yun J. Separation of car-dependent commuters from normal-choice riders in mode-choice analysis. Transportation 36 4 (2009) 423-436
40. Tardiff T.J. Attitudinal market segmentation for transit design, marketing, and policy analysis. Transportation Research Record 735 (1979) 1-7
41. Teichert T., Shehu E., and von Wartburg I. Customer segmentation revisited: the case of the airline industry. Transportation Research A 42 1 (2008) 227-242
42. Thøgersen J.B., and Møller B. Breaking car use habits: the effectiveness of a free one-month travelcard. Transportation 35 3 (2008) 239-345
43. TRB. Preferences, perceptions, and market segments in travel behavior. Transportation Research Record 649 (1977) 48
44. Tsamboulas D., Golias J., and Vlahoyannis M. Model development for metro station access mode choice. Transportation 19 3 (1992) 231-244
45. Vermunt J.K., and Magidson J. Latent class cluster analysis. In: Hagenaars J.A., and McCutcheon A.L. (Eds). Applied Latent Class Analysis (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 89-106