Snake mitochondrial genomes: Phylogenetic relationships and implications of extended taxon sampling for interpretations of mitogenomic evolution

BMC Genomics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Douglas, Desirée A ^a   Gower, David J ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME RNA; TRANSFER RNA;

ALETHINOPHIDIA; ANILIUS SCYTALE; ARTICLE; CAENOPHIDIA; CHARINA TRIVIRGATA; CLADISTICS; COLUBROIDEA; CYLINDROPHIIDAE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE TRANSLOCATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HENOPHIDIA; MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; REGULATOR GENE; RHINOPHIS PHILIPPINUS; SCOLECOPHIDIA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SERPENTES; SNAKE; SNAKE MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TAXONOMIC RANK; TYPHLOPIDAE; UROPELTIDAE; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

ALETHINOPHIDIA; ANILIUS; ANILIUS SCYTALE; CHARINA TRIVIRGATA; COLUBROIDEA; CYLINDROPHIIDAE; HENOPHIDIA; RHINOPHIS PHILIPPINUS; SERPENTES; TYPHLOPIDAE; UROPELTIDAE; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; BASE COMPOSITION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, MITOCHONDRIAL; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SNAKES;

EID: 76749085724     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-14     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Kumazawa Y, Ota H, Nishida M, Ozawa T. Gene rearrangements in snake mitochondrial genomes, highly concerted evolution of control region-like sequences duplicated and inserted into a tRNA gene cluster. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13(9):1242-1254.
2. Kumazawa Y, Ota H, Nishida M, Ozawa T. The complete nucleotide sequence of a snake (Dinodon semicarinatus) mitochondrial genome with two identical control regions. Genetics 1998, 150:313-329. 1460336, 9725849.
3. Jiang ZJ, Castoe TA, Austin CC, Burbrink FT, Herron MD, McGuire JA, Parkinson CL, Pollock DD. Comparative mitochondrial genomics of snakes: extraordinary substitution rate dynamics and functionality of the duplicate control region. BMC Evol Biol 2007, 7:123. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-123, 1950710, 17655768.
4. Yan J, Li H, Zhou K. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome in snakes: gene rearrangements and phylogenetic relationships. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:569. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-569, 2632649, 19038056.
5. Dong S, Kumazawa Y. Complete mitochondrial DNA sequences of six snakes: phylogenetic relationships and molecular evolution of genomic features. J Mol Evol 2005, 61(1):12-22. 10.1007/s00239-004-0190-9, 16007493.
6. Castoe TA, Jiang ZJ, Gu W, Wang ZO, Pollock DD. Adaptive evolution and functional redesign of core metabolic proteins in snakes. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(5):e2201. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002201, 2376058, 18493604.
7. Lee MSY, Hugall AF, Lawson R, Scanlon JD. Phylogeny of snakes (Serpentes): combining morphological and molecular data in likelihood, Bayesian and parsimony analyses. Systematics and Biodiversity 2007, 5(4):371-389.
8. Kumazawa Y. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of five squamates: phylogenetic affiliation of snakes. DNA Res 2004, 11:137-144. 10.1093/dnares/11.2.137, 15449546.
9. Douglas DA, Janke A, Arnason U. A mitogenomic study on the phylogenetic position of snakes. Zool Scr 2006, 35(6):545-558.
10. Castoe TA, de Koning APJ, Kim H, Gu W, Noonan BP, Naylor G, Jiang ZJ, Parkinson CL, Pollock DD. Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution. PNAS 2009, 106(22):8986-8991. 10.1073/pnas.0900233106, 2690048, 19416880.
11. McDiarmid RW, Campbell JA, Toure TA. Snake species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference 1999, 1. Herpetologists' League.
12. Greene H, Cundall D. Limbless tetrapods and snakes with legs. Science 2000, 287:1939-1941. 10.1126/science.287.5460.1939, 10755945.
13. Vidal N, Hedges SB. The molecular evolutionary tree of lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians. CR Biol 2008, doi: 101016/jcrvi200807010.
14. Albert EM, San Mauro D, García-París M, Rüber L, Zardoya R. Effect of taxon sampling on recovering the phylogeny of squamate reptiles based on complete mitochondrial genome and nuclear gene sequence data. Gene 2008, 441(1-2):12-21. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.05.014, 18639394.
15. Wiens JJ, Kuczynski CA, Smith SA, Mulcahy DG, Sites JW, Townsend TM, Reeder TW. Branch lengths, support and congruence: testing the phylogenomic approach with 20 nuclear loci in snakes. Syst Biol 2008, 57(3):420-431. 10.1080/10635150802166053, 18570036.
16. Wilcox TP, Zwickl DJ, Heath TA, Hillis DM. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2002, 25:361-371. 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00244-0, 12414316.
17. Vidal N, Hedges SB. Higher-level relationships of snakes inferred from four nuclear and mitochondrial genes. CR Biol 2002, 325:977-985.
18. Vidal N, Hedges SB. Molecular evidence for a terrestrial origin of snakes. Proc R Soc Lond B 2004, 271(suppl 4):226-229.
19. Noonan BP, Chippendale PT. Dispersal and vicariance: the complex evolutionary history of boid snakes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2006, 40(2):347-358. 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.010, 16624591.
20. Vidal N, Delmas A, Hedges SB. The higher-level relationships of alethinophidian snakes inferred from seven nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Biology of the Boas and Pythons 2007, Eagle Mountain Publishing, Eagle Mountain, Utah, Henderson RW, Powell R.
21. Kley NJ, Breinerd EL. Feeding by mandibular raking in a snake. Nature 1999, 402:369-370.
22. Kumazawa Y, Endo H. Mitochondrial genome of the Komodo dragon, efficient sequencing method with reptile-oriented primers and novel gene rearrangements. DNA Res 2004, 11:115-125. 10.1093/dnares/11.2.115, 15449544.
23. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nuc Acids Res 2005, 33:511-518.
24. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J. T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Evol 2000, 302(1):205-217.
25. Cannone JJ, Subramanian S, Schnare MN, Collet JR, D'Souza LM, Du Y, Feng B, Lin, Madabusi LV, Müller KM, Pande N, Shang Z, Yu N, Gutell RR. The comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site: An online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron and other RNAs. BMC Bioinf 2002, 3:15.
26. Swofford DL. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4[computer software and manual]. 2002, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
27. Brown JM, Lemmon AR. The importance of data partitioning and the utility of Bayes Factors in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst Biol 56(4):643-655. 10.1080/10635150701546249, 17661232.
28. Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes Factors. J Am Stat Assoc 1995, 90(430):773-795.
29. Posada D, Crandall KA. Modeltest, testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinf 1998, 14(9):817-818.
30. Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J Mol Evol 1984, 20(1):86-93. 10.1007/BF02101990, 6429346.
31. Gu X, Fu Y, Li W. Maximum likelihood estimation of heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol Biol Evol 1995, 12(4):546-557.
32. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 1993, 10:512-526.
33. Adachi J, Hasegawa M. Model of amino acid substitution in proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 1996, 42:459-468. 10.1007/BF02498640, 8642615.
34. Lartillot N, Philippe H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol 2004, 21(6):1095-1109. 10.1093/molbev/msh112, 15014145.
35. Lartillot N, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. Suppression of long-branch attraction artifacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evol Biol 2007, 7(suppl 1):S4. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S4, 1796613, 17288577.
36. Jobb G. TREEFINDER. version of January 2008 [Computer software and manual] Munich, Germany Distributed by the author at , http://www.treefinder.de
37. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 2001, 294:2310-2314. 10.1126/science.1065889, 11743192.
38. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinf 2003, 19:1572-1574.
39. University of Oslo Bioportal. , http://www.bioportal.uio.no
40. Tchernov E, Rieppel O, Zaher H, Polcyn MJ, Jacobs LL. A fossil snake with limbs. Science 2000, 287:2010-2012. 10.1126/science.287.5460.2010, 10720326.
41. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981, 17:368-376. 10.1007/BF01734359, 7288891.
42. Strimmer K, Rambaut A. Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees. Proc R Soc Lond B 2002, 269:137-142.
43. Kishino H, Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data and the branching order in Hominoidea. J Mol Evol 1989, 29:170-179. 10.1007/BF02100115, 2509717.
44. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 1999, 16:1114-1116.
45. Shimodaira H. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst Biol 2002, 51(3):492-508. 10.1080/10635150290069913, 12079646.
46. Vidal N, Hedges SB. The phylogeny of squamate reptiles (lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians) inferred from nine nuclear protein-coding genes. CR Biol 2005, 328:1000-1008.
47. Kumazawa Y. Mitochondrial genomes from major lizard families suggest their phylogenetic relationships and ancient radiations. Gene 2007, 388:19-26. 10.1016/j.gene.2006.09.026, 17118581.