Adaptation and validation of an agent model of functional state and performance for individuals

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5925 LNAI, Issue , 2009, Pages 595-607

  Both, Fiemke ^a   Hoogendoorn, Mark ^a   Jaffry, S Waqar ^a   Van Lambalgen, Rianne ^a   Oorburg, Rogier ^b   Sharpanskykh, Alexei ^a   Treur, Jan ^a   De Vos, Michael ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Force Vision Lab   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agent model; Functional state; Validation

Indexed keywords

AGENT MODEL; FORMAL VERIFICATIONS; FUNCTIONAL STATE; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; PARAMETER SETTING; PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 76649129594     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11161-7_46     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bosse, T., Both, F., van Lambalgen, R., Treur, J.: An Agent Model for a Human's Functional State and Performance. In: Jain, L., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of International Conference, IAT 2008, pp. 302-307. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2008)
2. Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., Meij, L., van der Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J.: Specification and Verification of Dynamics in Agent Models. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 18(1), 167-193 (2008)
3. Costa Jr., P.T., McCrae, R.R.: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual (Psychological Assessment Resources). Odessa, FL (1992)
4. Hancock, P.A., Williams, G., Manning, C.P., Miyake, S.: Influence of task demand characteristics on workload and performance. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 5(1), 63-86 (1995)
5. Hill, D.W.: The critical power concept. Sports Medicine 16, 237-254 (1993)
6. Hockey, G.R.J.: Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology 45, 73-93 (1997)
7. Kozierok, R., Maes, P.: A Learning Interface Agent for Scheduling Meetings. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 81-88 (1993)
8. Maheswaran, R., Tambe, M., Varakantham, P., Myers, K.: Adjustable autonomy challenges in personal assistant agents: A position paper. In: Proceedings of the AAMAS 2003 Workshop on Agents and Comp. Autonomy, pp. 187-194 (2003)
9. Matthews, G., Deary, I.J.: Personality traits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
10. Mitchell, T., Caruana, R., Freitag, D., McDermott, J., Zabowski, D.: Experience with a Learning Personal Assistant. Communication of the ACM 37(7), 81-91 (1994)
11. Parkhurst, D., Law, K., Niebur, E.: Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research 42(1), 107-123 (2002)
12. Plomin, R., Spinath, F.M.: Genetics and general cognitive ability. Trends in Cognitive Science 6(4), 369-176
13. Rose, C.L., Murphy, L.B., Byard, L., Nikzad, K.: The role of the Big Five personality factors in vigilance performance and workload. European Journal of Personality 16, 185-200 (2002)
14. Salgado, J.F.: The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(1), 30-43 (1997)
15. Sorenson, H.W.: Parameter estimation: principles and problems. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1980)
16. Yilmaz, L.: Validation and verification of social processes within agent-based computational organization models. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 12, 283-312 (2006)