Building respectful interface agents

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 209-222

  Schiaffino, Silvia ^a,b   Armentano, Marcelo ^a,b   Amandi, Analia ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL CENTRO DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Interface agents; Plan recognition; User profiling; User agent interaction

Indexed keywords

AGENT INTERACTION; INTERFACE AGENT; MANAGEMENT DOMAINS; PLAN RECOGNITION; SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS; USER PROFILE; USER PROFILING;

SOFTWARE AGENTS;

EID: 76649105417     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R., 1994. Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 94), pp. 487-499.
2. Arroyo, E., Selker, T., Stouffs, A., 2002. Interruptions as multimodal outputs: which are the less disruptive? In: IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI 02, pp. 479-483.
3. Bailey B.P., and Konstan J.A. On the need for attention-aware systems: measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior 22 4 (2006) 685-708
4. Bailey B.P., and Iqbal S.T. Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 14 4 (2008) 1-28
5. Bauer, M., 1996. Acquisition of user preferences for plan recognition. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 105-112.
6. Brown, S.M., Santos Jr., E., Banks, S.B., Oxley, M., 1998. Using explicit requirements and metrics for interface agent user model correction. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents '98). ACM Press, New York, pp. 1-7.
7. Cooper G.F., and Herskovits E. A bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning 9 4 (1992) 309-347
8. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., Horvitz, E., 2000a. Instant messaging: effects of relevance and timing. In: People and Computers XIV: Proceedings of HCI 2000, pp. 71-76.
9. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., Horvitz, E., 2000b. Instant messaging and interruption: influence of task type on performance. In: Proceedings OZCHI.
10. Duong, T.V., Phung, D.Q., Bui, H.H., Venkatesh, S., 2006. Human behavior recognition with generic exponential family duration modeling in the hidden semi-Markov model. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 3, pp. 202-207.
11. Eyharabide, M.V., Gasparini, I., Schiaffino, S., Amandi, A., 2009. Personalized e-learning environments: considering students' contexts. In: Proceedings WCCE 2009-IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education-Bento Goncalves, Brazil, July, in press.
12. Fleming, M., Cohen, R., 2001. A user modeling approach to determining system initiative in mixed-initiative AI systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference On User Modeling, pp. 54-63.
13. Garrett R.K., and Danziger J.N. IM = interruption management? Instant messaging and disruption in the workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 1 (2008) 23-42
14. Geib, C., Goldman, R., 2005. Partial observability and probabilistic plan/goal recognition. In: IJCAI-05 Workshop on Modeling Others from Observations, Edinburgh, Scotland.
15. Gillie T., and Broadbent D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity and complexity. Psychological Research 50 (1989) 243-250
16. Horvitz, E., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D., Rommelse, K., 1998. The Lumière Project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 256-265.
17. Horvitz, E., 1999. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In:Proceedings ACM Conference Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 99), pp. 159-166.
18. Jensen F. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs (2001), Springer, New York
19. Kautz H. A Formal Theory of Plan Recognition and its Implementation, Reasoning About Plans (1991), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos, CA pp. 69-125
20. Klementinen, M., Mannila, H., Ronkainen, P., Toivonen, H., Verkamo, A.I., 1994. Finding interesting rules from large sets of discovered association rules. In: Third International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 401-407.
21. Kozierok, R., Maes, P. A learning interface agent for scheduling meetings. In ACM-SIGCHI International Workshop on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 81-93.
22. Lauritzen S.L. The em algorithm for graphical association models with missing data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 19 2 (1995) 191-201
23. Liu, Y., Cai, J., Yin, J., Wai-Chee Fu, A., 2007. Clustering massive text data streams by semantic smoothing model. In: Advanced Data Mining and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4632, pp. 389-400.
24. Maes P. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM 37 7 (1994) 30-40
25. Mc Farlane, D., 1999. Coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. In: Human-Computer Interaction, INTERACT 1999, pp. 295-303.
26. Madani, O., Bui, H. Yeh, E., 2009. Efficient online learning and prediction of users' desktop actions. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-09.
27. Miller C. Human-computer etiquette: managing expectations with intentional agents. Communications of the ACM 47 4 (2004) 31-34
28. Philipose M., Fishkin K.P., Perkowitz M., Patterson D.J., Fox D., Kautz H., and Hahnel D. Inferring activities from interactions with objects. Pervasive Computing Magazine 3 4 (2004) 10-17
29. Rich C., Sidner C., and Leash N. Collagen: applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer interaction. Artificial Intelligence 22 4 (2001) 15-25
30. Rudman, P., Zajizek, M., 2006. Autonomous agent as helper-helpful or annoying? In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2006 Main Conference Proceedings), IAT'06 2007, pp. 170-176.
31. Schiaffino S., and Amandi A. Polite personal agents. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21 1 (2006) 12-19
32. Schiaffino S., and Amandi A. User-interface agent interaction: personalization issues. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 60 1 (2004) 129-148
33. Schiaffino, S., 2004. Personalization of user-interface agent interaction. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. Cs. Exactas, UNCPBA, Tandil, Argentina (Chapter 7).
34. Serenko A., Bontis N., and Detlor B. End-user adoption of animated interface agents in everyday work applications. Behaviour and Information Technology 26 2 (2007) 119-132
35. Shah, D., Lakshmanan, L., Ramamrithnanm, K., Sudarshan, S., 1999. Interestingness and pruning of mined patterns. In: Proceedings Workshop Research Issues in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, ACM Press, New York.