Tackling cognitively-complex collaboration with CoPe-it!

International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 22-38

  Karacapilidis, Nikos ^a   Tzagarakis, Manolis ^a   Karousos, Nikos ^a   Gkotsis, George ^a   Kallistros, Vassilis ^a   Christodoulou, Spyros ^a   Mettouris, Christos ^a   Nousia, Dora ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Argumentative collaboration; Computer supported cooperative work; Decision support systems; Electronic collaboration; Incremental formalization; Visualization of collaboration

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DECISION MAKING;

AGGREGATE DATUM; ARGUMENTATIVE COLLABORATION; COLLABORATIVE PRACTICES; ELECTRONIC COLLABORATION; INCREMENTAL FORMALIZATION; SENSE MAKING; WEB-BASED TOOLS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 76649102675     PISSN: 15481093     EISSN: 15481107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jwbltt.2009090802     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ayres, P., & van Gog, T. (2009). State of the art research into Cognitive Load Theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 253-257. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.007
2. Castells, M. (2004). The network society: A crosscultural perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
3. Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Action research: Its nature and validity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1), 9-21. doi:10.1023/A:1022908820784 (Pubitemid 128405462)
4. Conklin, J., & Begeman, M. (1989). gIBIS: A tool for all reasons. Journal of the American Society for Information Science American Society for Information Science, 40(3), 200-213. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198905)40: 3<200::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-U
5. Conklin, J., Selvin, A. M., Buckingham Shum, S., & Sierhuis, M. (2001, August 14-18). Facilitated hypertext for collective sense-making: 15 years on from gIBIS. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Århus, Denmark (pp. 123-124). ACM Publishing.
6. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson International Edition.
7. de Moor, A., & Aakhus, M. (2006). Argumentation support: From technologies to tools. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 93-98. doi:10.1145/1118178.1118182
8. Fischer, G., Lemke, A. C., McCall, R., & Morch, A. (1991). Making argumentation serve design. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3-4), 393-419. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0603&4-7
9. Halasz, F. (1988). Reflections on NoteCards: Seven issues for the next generation of hypermedia systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(7), 836-852. doi:10.1145/48511.48514
10. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for humancomputer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-196. doi:10.1145/353485.353487
11. Kalyuga, S. (2009). Instructional designs for the development of transferable knowledge and skills: A cognitive load perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 332-338. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.019
12. Karacapilidis, N., & Papadias, D. (2001). Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES System. Information Systems, 26(4), 259-277. doi:10.1016/S0306-4379(01)00020-5 (Pubitemid 33046259)
13. Karacapilidis, N., & Tzagarakis, M. (2009). Supporting argumentative collaboration in communities of practice: The CoPe-it! approach. In N. Karacapilidis (Ed.), Solutions and innovations in Web-based technologies for augmented learning: Improved platforms, tools and applications (pp. 245-257). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
14. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 306-314. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008
15. Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S., & Carr, C. (2003). Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. London: Springer.
16. Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems (Tech. Rep. 0131). Stuttgart, Germany: Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Grundlagen der Planning.
17. Leutner, D., Leopold, C., & Sumfleth, E. (2009). Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 284-289. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12. 010
18. Marshall, C., & Shipman, F. M. (1995). Spatial hypertext: Designing for change. Communications of the ACM, 38(8), 88-97. doi:10.1145/208344.208350
19. Marshall, C., & Shipman, F. M. (1997, April 6-11). Spatial hypertext and the practice of information triage. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Hypertext, Southampton, United Kingdom (pp. 124-133). ACM Publishing.
20. Nonaka, I. (2005). Knowledge management: Critical perspectives on business and management. London: Taylor & Francis.
21. Reed, C. A., & Rowe, G. W. A. (2004). Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal of AI Tools, 14(3-4), 961-980. doi:10.1142/S0218213004001922 (Pubitemid 40111952)
22. Shipman, F. M., & Marshall, C. C. (1994). Formality considered harmful: Issues, experiences, emerging themes, and directions (Tech. Rep. ISTLCSA-94-08-02). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
23. Shipman, F. M., & McCall, R. (1994, April 24-28). Supporting knowledge-base evolution with incremental formalization. In Proceedings of the CHI '94 Conference, Boston (pp. 285-291). ACM Publishing.
24. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421-447. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9028-y
25. Suthers, D., Weiner, A., Connelly, J., & Paolucci, M. (1995, August 16-19). Belvedere: Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. In Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Washington, DC (pp. 266-273). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
26. van Gelder, T. J. (2002). Argument mapping with Reason!Able. The American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 2(1), 85-90.
27. Verheij, B. (2003). Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 150(1-2), 291-324. doi:10.1016/S0004- 3702(03)00107-3
28. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.