Facilitating conceptual change in understanding state of matter and solubility concepts by using 5E learning cycle model;Maddeni̇n yoǧun fazlarive çözünürlük kavramlarini anlamada 5E öǧrenme modeli̇ni̇n kullanimi i̇le kavramsal deǧi̇şi̇mi̇n kolaylaş tirilmasi

Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi

Volumn , Issue 36, 2009, Pages 41-50

  Ceylan, Eren ^a   Geban, Ömer ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

5E learning cycle model; Chemistry education; Sate of matter and solubility

Indexed keywords

EID: 76649094239     PISSN: 13005340     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ahmad, J. (2000). Crystallization from a Supersaturated Solution of Sodium Acetate. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(11), 1446.
2. Akar, E. (2005). Effectiveness of 5e learning cycle model on students' understanding of acid-base concepts. Unpublished master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
3. Balci, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Engagement exploration, explanation, extension, and, evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(3), 199203.
4. Bevenino, M., Dengel, M. J., & Adams, K. (1999). Constructivist Theory in the Classroom. The Clearing House.
5. Boddy, N., Watson, K. & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of five Es: A referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education. 33(1), 27-42. (Pubitemid 39138487)
6. Bodner, G. M. (1991). I have found you an argument. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(5), 385-388.
7. Boylan, C. (1988). Enhancing learning in science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 6(2), 205-217.
8. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Improving Instruction. In Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practice. Portsmouth, N.H: Heinemann.
9. Bybee, R.W., Taylor, A.J., Gardner, A., Van Scotteer P., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications. Full report. Colorado Springs.
10. Cakir, O. S., Uzuntiryaki, E., & Geban, O, (2002). Contribution of conceptual change texts and concept mapping to students' understanding of acid and bases. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, New Orleans, LA.
11. Campbell, M.A. (2000). The effects of the 5E learning cycle model on students' understanding of force and motion concepts. Unpublished master thesis, Millersville University, Florida.
12. Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., & Gunstone, R. F. (1982). Cognitive research and the design of science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 17(1), 31-53.
13. Chittleborough, G.D., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2002). Constraints to the development of first year university chemistry students' mental models of chemical phenomena. Teaching and Learning Forum: Focus on the Student. 1-7.
14. Chiu, M.-H., Chou, C.-C., & Liu, C.-J. (2002). Dynamic processes of conceptual change: Analysis of constructing mental models of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 688-712.
15. Coulson, D. (2002). BSCS Science: An Inquiry Approach: 2002 Evaluation Findings. Arnold, MD: PS International.
16. Driver, R., & Easley, J. A. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
17. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science - From behaviourism towards social contructivism and beyond. International handbook of Science Education, Part 1. B. J. Fraser, Tobin, K. G. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Press: 3-25.
18. Ebbing, D. D., & Gammon, S. D., (2005). General Chemistry. New York, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
19. Garcia, C. M. (2005). Comparing the 5Es and traditional approach to teaching evolution in a hispanic middle school science classroom. Unpublished master thesis, California State University, USA.
20. Garnett, P. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electric circuits and oxidation-reduction equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 121-142.
21. Gonzalez, F. (1997). Diagnosis of Spanish primary school students' common alternative science conceptions. School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 68-74.
22. Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628.
23. Guzetti, B, J. (2000). Learning counter intuitive science concepts: what have we learned from over a decade of research? Reading, Writing, Quarterly, 16, 89-95.
24. Hatzinikita, V & Koulaidis, V (1995). Children's and undergraduate students' conceptions of the changes in satte of water. In Proceedings, 2nd European Conference on Research in Chemical Education. University of Pisa, Italy.
25. Hesse, J. J., & Anderson, C. W. (1992). Students' conceptions of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 277-299.
26. Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1-13.
27. Kind, V. (2004). Beyond Appearances: Students' misconceptions about basic chemical ideas. Durham: Durham University.
28. Krnel, D., Watson, R. , Glazar, S. (1998). Survey of research related to the development of the concept of 'matter'. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 257-289.
29. Kuiper, J. (1994). Student ideas of science concepts: Alternative frameworks? International Journal of Science Education, 16(3), 279-292.
30. Lee, Y., & Law, N. (2001). Exploration in promoting conceptual change in electrical concepts via ontological category shift. International Journal of Science Education, 23(2), 111-150. (Pubitemid 33597986)
31. Lord, T. R. (1997). A comparison between traditional and constructivist teaching in college biology. Innovative Higher Education, 21(3), 197-216.
32. Mecit, Ö. (2006). The effect of 7E learning cycle model on the improvement of fifth grade students' critical thinking skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
33. Mulford, D. R. & Robinson, W. R. (2002). An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(6), 739-744.
34. Nieswandt, M. (2001). Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective. Science Education, 85(2), 158-179. (Pubitemid 33232438)
35. Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.
36. Okey, J. R., Wise, K. C., & Burns, J.C. (1982). Integrated process Skill Test-2 (Available from Dr. James R. Okey, Department of Science Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602).
37. Olgun, O. S. C. (2008). Examining the fifth graders' understanding of heat and temperature concepts via concept mapping. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 54-62.
38. Osborne, R. (1982). Conceptual change - For pupils and teachers. Research in Science Education, 12, 25-31.
39. Osborne, R., & Cosgrove, M. (1983). Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825-838.
40. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. NY: Basic Books.
41. Piaget, J. (1975). Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
43. Resnik, L. (1983). Mathematics and science learning: A new conception. Science, 220, 477-478.
44. Sankaya, Y. & Erdik, E. (2005). Temel Universite Kimyast. Ankara: Hacettepe Taş.
45. Savinainen, A., Scott, P., & Viiri, J. (2004). Using a bridging representation and social interactions to foster conceptual change: Designing and evaluating an instructional sequence for Newton's third law. Journal of research Science Teaching, 175-185.
46. Schmidt, H. (1997). Students' misconceptions - Looking for a pattern. Science Education, 81(2), 123-135.
47. Schoon, K., & Boone, W. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553-568. (Pubitemid 128092488)
48. Stavy, R. (1990). Children's conceptions of changes in the state of matter: From liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 247-266.
49. Stavy, R. (1991). Using analogy to overcome misconceptions about conservation of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 305-313.
50. Strike, K. A. (1983). Misconceptions and conceptual change: Philosophical reflections on the research program. Proceedings of the International Seminar Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University: 67-78.
51. Sungur. S., Tekkaya, C. & Geban, Ö. (2001). The conribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to students' understanding of the human circulatory system. School Science and Mathematics, 101(2), 91-101.
52. Taber, K. (1998). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 597-608.
53. Taber, K. S. (2001). Shifting sands: A case study of conceptual development as competition between alternative conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 731-754.
54. Tsai, C. C. (1996). The interrelations between junior high school students' scientific epistemological beliefs, learning environment preferences and cognitive structure outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, USA.
55. Ure, M. C., Colinvaux, D. (1989). Developing adults' views on the phenomenon of change of physical state in water. International Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 153-160.
56. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J. , & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. D. Gabel. New York, Macmillan: 177-210.