Private ownership and public good provision in english woodlands

Small-scale Forestry

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-20

  Urquhart, Julie ^a   Courtney, Paul ^a   Slee, Bill ^b  

^a University of Gloucestershire ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Motivations; Non market benefits; Private woodland owner; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY MODELING; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; OWNERSHIP; PRIVATE SECTOR; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; WOODLAND;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 76649087639     PISSN: 18737617     EISSN: 18737854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11842-009-9098-y     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Amar A, Hewson CM, Thewlis RM, Smith KW, Fulle RJ, Lindsell JA, Conway G, Butler S, MacDonald M (2006) What's happening to our woodland birds? Long-term change in the populations of woodland birds. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds & British Trust for Ornithology, Sandy, Bedfordshire.
2. Bateman IJ, Lovett AA, Brainard JS (2005) Applied environmental economics: a GIS approach to cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Bliss JC, Martin JA (1989) Identifying NIPF management motivations with qualitative methods, For Sci 35(2): 601-622.
4. Boon TE, Meilby H (2005) A forest owner typology based on forest management attitudes. Small-scale forestry in a changing environment, IUFRO Research Group 3. 08. 00. International symposium 2005, 30 May-4 June, Vilnius, Lithuania.
5. Bowler I, Ilbery B (1999) Agricultural land-use and landscape change under the post-productivist transition-examples from the United Kingdom. In: Kroenert R, Baudry J, Bowler I, Reenberg A (eds) Land-use changes and their environmental impact in rural areas in Europe. The Parthenon Publishing Group, Paris, pp 121-140.
6. Brainard J, Bateman I, Lovett A (2001) Modelling demand for recreation in English woodlands. Forestry 74(5): 423-438.
7. Brown KM (2007) Understanding the materialities and moralities of property: reworking collective claims to land. Trans Inst Br Geogr 32(4): 507-522.
8. Church A, Ravenscroft N (2008) Landowner responses to financial incentive schemes for recreational access to woodlands in South East England. Land Use Policy 25(1): 1-16.
9. Church A, Ravenscroft N, Rogers G (2005) Woodland owners' attitudes to public access provision in South-East England. Information note on report to the Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
10. CLA (1999) Survey of permitted access. Countryside Landowners' Association, London.
11. CJC Consulting (2003) Economic analysis of forestry policy in England. Report to Defra and H. M. Treasury. CJC Consulting, Oxford.
12. CJC Consulting (2004) Economic analysis of the contribution of the forest estate managed by Forestry Commission Scotland. Report for Forestry Commission Scotland. CJC Consulting, Oxford.
13. Creighton JH, Baumgartner DM, Blatner KA (2002) Ecosystem management and nonindustrial private forest landowners in Washington State, USA. Small-Scale For Econ Manag Policy 1(1): 55-69.
14. Curry N, Ravenscroft N (2001) Countryside recreation provision in England: exploring a demand-led approach. Land Use Policy 18(3): 281-291.
15. Defra (2007) A strategy for England's trees, woods and forests. London.
16. Dhubhain AN, Chobanova R, Karpinnen H, Mizaraite D, Ritter E, Slee B, Wall S (2006) The values and objectives of private forest owners and their influence on forestry behaviour: the implications for entrepreneurship. In: Niskanen A (ed) Issues affecting enterprise development in the forest sector in Europe, Research Notes 169. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, pp 71-83.
17. Dickie I, Rayment M (2001) Assessing the economic benefits of forestry in the UK. RSPB. Paper prepared for the Forestry Commission.
18. FC (2001a) Woodlands for wales. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
19. FC (2001b) National inventory of woodland and trees-England. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
20. FC (2006a) The Scottish Forest Strategy. Retrieved 2 May 2006, from http://www.forestry.gov.uk/fr/infd-5suk4r.
21. FC (2006b) Forestry statistics. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
22. FC (2007) Woodfuel strategy for England. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
23. Hanley N, Shogren JF, White B (1997) Environmental economics. In: Theory and practice. Macmillan Press Ltd., London.
24. Hardter U (2002) Urbanized owners of private forest property, IUFRO international symposium on contributions of Family Farm Enterprises to Sustainable Rural Development, 29 July-1 August 2002, Gengenbach/Schwarzwald, Germany.
25. Harrison S, Herbohn J, Niskanen A (2002) Non-industrial, smallholder, small-scale and family forestry: What's in a name? Small-Scale For Econ Manag Policy 1(1): 1-11.
26. Hogl K, Pregernig M, Weiss G (2005) What is new about new forest owners? A typology of private forest ownership in Austria. Small-Scale For Econ Manag Policy 4(3): 325-342.
27. Holmes J (2006) Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda. J Rural Stud 22(2): 142-160.
28. Horne P (2006) Forest owners' acceptance of incentive based policy instruments in forest biodiversity conservation. Silva Fenn 40(1): 169-178.
29. Ilbery B (ed) (1998) The geography of rural change. Pearson Education Ltd., Harlow.
30. Ilbery B, Bowler I (1998) From agricultural productivism to postproductivism. In: Ilbery B (ed) The geography of rural change. Pearson Education Ltd., Harlow, pp 57-84.
31. Ingermarson F, Lindhagen A, Eriksson L (2006) A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden. Scand J For Res 21(3): 249-259.
32. Innes JL (1993) 'New perspectives in forestry': a basis for a future forest management policy in Great Britain? Forestry 66(4): 395-421.
33. Jacobsen MG (2002) Ecosystem management in the southeast United States: Interest of forest landowners in joint management across ownerships. Small-Scale For Econ Manag Policy 1(1): 71-92.
34. Jones SB, Luloff AE, Finlay JC (1995) Another look at NIPFs: facing our 'myths'. J For 93(9): 41-44.
35. Karpinnen H (1998) Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fenn 32(1): 43-59.
36. Karpinnen H (2005) Forest owners' choice of reforestation method: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. For Policy Econ 7(3): 393-409.
37. Kirby KJ, Smart SM, Black HIJ, Bunce RGH, Corney PM, Smithers RJ (2005) Long term ecological change in British woodland (1971-2001), a resurvey and analysis of change based on the 103 sites in the Nature Conservancy 'Bunce 1971' woodland survey. English Nature, Perth.
38. Kristensen LS, Thenail C, Kristensen SP (2004) Landscape changes in agrarian landscapes in the 1990s: the interaction between farmers and the farmed landscape. A case study from Jutland, Denmark. J Environ Manag 71(3): 231-244.
39. Kula E (1986) The developing framework for the economic evaluation of forestry in the United Kingdom. J Agric Econ 37(3): 365-376.
40. Kurtz WB, Lewis BJ (1981) Decision-making framework for nonindustrial private forest owners: an application in the Missouri Ozarks. J For 79(5): 285-288.
41. Kuuluvainen J, Karpinnen H, Ovaskainen V (1996) Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. For Sci 42(3): 300-309.
42. Kvarda E (2004) 'Non-agricultural forest owners' in Austria-a new type of forest ownership. For Policy Econ 6(5): 459-467.
43. Loenstedt L (1997) Non-industrial private forest owner's decision process: a qualitative study about goals, time perspective, opportunities and alternatives. Scand J For Res 12(3): 302-310.
44. Madsen LM (2003) New woodlands in Denmark: the role of private landowners. Urban For Urban Green 1(3): 185-195.
45. Marsden T (1998) New rural territories: regulating the differentiated rural spaces. J Rural Stud 14(1): 107-117.
46. Mather A (2001) Forests of consumption: postproductivism, postmaterialism and the postindustrial forest. Environ Plan C Govern Policy 19(2): 249-268.
47. Mather AS, Hill G, Nijnik M (2006) Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge for theorization? J Rural Stud 22(4): 441-455.
48. Matthews JD (1994) Implementing forest policy in the lowlands of Britain. Forestry 67(1): 1-12.
49. Mizaraite D, Mizaras S (2005) The formation of small-scale forestry in countries with economy in transition: observations from Lithuania. Small-Scale For Econ Manag Policy 4(4): 437-450.
50. O'Brien L (2004) A sort of magical place. Forest Research, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
51. Pearce DW (1991) Forestry expansion-a study of technical, economic and ecological factors. Forestry Commission Occasional Paper 47, Edinburgh.
52. Pitt DJ (1992) The fast lane of urban fringe forest economics. Forestry 65(2): 189-204.
53. Price C (1997) Twenty-five years of cost-benefit analysis in Britain. Forestry 70(3): 171-189.
54. Selman P (1997) The role of forestry in meeting planning objectives. Land Use Policy 14(1): 55-73.
55. Shoard M (1999) A right to roam. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
56. Sime JD, Speller GM, Dibben C (1993) Research into the attitudes of owners and managers to people visiting woodlands. Report prepared for the Forestry Commission by Jonathan Sime Associates, Godalming.
57. Slee RW (2005) From countrysides of production to countrysides of consumption? J Agric Sci 143(4): 255-265.
58. Slee B (2006) The scope for reconciling public good and private forestry in the UK. Small-scale For Econ Manag Policy 5(1): 1-18.
59. Slee W, Evans R, Roberts D (2004) Forestry in the rural economy: a new approach to assessing the impact of forestry on rural development. Forestry 77(5): 441-453.
60. Slee B, Urquhart J, Taylor D (2006) Woodland management for timber and wood products: the impact on public goods countryside and Community Research Unit. University of Gloucestershire. Report prepared for the Forestry Commission and Defra.
61. Suda M, Beck R, Schaffner S (2001) Kleinprivatwaldsorschung-quo vadis? Paper presented to 33. Meeting of Forest Policy Scientists. 4-6 April 2001, Hann. Munden, Germany.
62. Tillhill & Savills (2008) Forest market report, Edition 10, Winter.
63. Tornqvist T (1995) Skogsriket arvingar. Uppsala, Sweden. Department of Forest-Industry Market Studies. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Report No: 41, 442p.
64. Turner RK, Pearce D, Bateman I (1994) Environmental economics: an elementary introduction. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
65. Ward Thompson C, Aspinall P, Bell S, Findlay C (2005) "It gets you away from everyday life": local woodlands and community use-what makes a difference? Landsc Res 30(1): 109-146.
66. Willis KG, Garrod G, Scarpa R, Powe N, Lovett A, Bateman IJ, Hanley N, Macmillan DC (2003) The social and environmental benefits of forests in Great Britain. Report to the Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
67. WT (2004) Space for people, Woodland Trust.