Development research of a teachers' educational performance support system: The practices of design, development, and evaluation

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 61-80

  Hung, Wei Chen ^a   Smith, Thomas J ^a   Harris, Marian S ^b   Lockard, James ^a  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Advance organizer; Development research; Performance support system

Indexed keywords

EID: 76549094833     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-007-9080-3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
2. Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Barker, P., & Banerji, A. (1995). Designing electronic performance support systems. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 4-12.
4. Berkey, M. A. (1973). Decision tables for clerical procedures. Management Accounting, 55(4), 21-26.
5. Clark, C. H., & Bean, T. W. (1982). Improving advance organizer research: Persistent problems and future directions. Reading World, 22(1), 2-10.
6. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (2001). The development of authentic educational technologies. Educational Technology, 39(2), 5-16.
7. Chasnoff, J. I. (2001). The nature of nurture: Biology, environment, and the drug-exposed child. Chicago: NTI Publishing.
8. Dumas, J. S., & Redish, J. C. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing. Exeter: Intellect.
9. Glaser, R. (1976). Components of a psychology of instruction: Toward a science of design. Review of Educational Research, 46(1), 1-24.
10. Hammond, N. (1993). Learning with hypertext: Problems, principles, and prospects. In C. McKnight, A. Dillon, & J. Richardson (Eds.), Hypertext: A psychological perspective (pp. 51-69). New York: Ellis Horwood.
11. Hung, W.-C., & Chao, C.-A. (2007). Integrating advance organizers and multidimensional information display in electronic performance support systems. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 181-198.
12. Hung, W.-C., & Lockard, J. (2007). The design and impact of using an advance organizer guided behavior matrix to support teachers' problem solving in classroom behavior management. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(1), 23-39.
13. Jones, T., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A development study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(2), 63-80.
14. Koschmann, T. D., Kelson, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1996). Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principles approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 83-124). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. McKenney, S., & van den Akker, J. (2005). Computer-based support for curriculum designers: A case of developmental research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(2), 41-66.
16. Nickles, G. M., III (2006). Identifying measures of student behavior from interaction with a course management system. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(1), 111-126.
17. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. New York: AP Professional.
18. Pressman, S. R. (1992). Software engineering: A practitioner's approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Cravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52-66). New York: Routledge.
20. Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 53-66.
21. Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 633-652). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., & Tucker, C. M. (2006). Building and sustaining communities that prevent mental disorders: Lessons from the field of special education. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 313-329.
23. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Richey, R. C., & Nelson, W. A. (2001). Development research. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1213-1245). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
25. Rosenfield, L., & Morville, P. (2002). Information architecture for the World Wide Web. Sebastopol: O'Reilly.
26. Rosson, B. M., & Carroll, M. J. (2002). Usability engineering: Scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.
27. Tjahjono, B., & Greenough, R. (2002). Using collaborative authoring to develop a hypermedia performance support system. Performance Improvement, 41(6), 34-41.
28. Tripp, S. D., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31-44.
29. Vennix, J. A. M., & Gubbels, J. W. (1994). Knowledge elicitation in conceptual model building: A case study in modeling a regional Dutch health care system. In J. Morecroft & J. Sterman (Eds.), Modeling for learning organizations (pp. 121-145). Portland: Productivity Press.
30. van Schaik, P., Pearson, R., & Barker, P. (2002). Designing electronic performance support systems to facilitate learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 289-306.
31. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.