Study strategies and generative learning: What works?

Journal of College Reading and Learning

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 7-18

  Van Blerkom, Dianna L ^a   Van Blerkom, Malcolm L ^a   Bertsch, Sharon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76449113420     PISSN: 10790195     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10790195.2006.10850190     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986). Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 256-262.
2. Dee-Lucas, D., & Di Vesta, F.J. (1980). Learner-generated organizational aids: Effects of learning from context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 304-311.
3. Doctorow, M., Wittrock, M. C., & Marks, C. (1978). Generative processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 109-118.
4. Donadlson, W., & Bass, M. (1980). Relational information and memory for problem solutions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 26-35.
5. Foos, P. W. (1989). Effects of student-written questions on student test performance. Hacking of Psychology, IS, 77-78.
6. Foos, P. W., Mora, J. J. & Tkacz, S. (1994). Student study techniques and the generation effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 567-576
7. Gillespie, C. (1990). Questions about student-generated questions. Journal of Reading, 34, 250-257.
8. Gourney, A. F. (1999). Teaching reading from a metacognitive perspective: Theory and classroom experience. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 30, 85-93.
9. Hartman, H. J. (1994). From reciprocal teaching to reciprocal education. Journal of Developmental Education, 18, 2-8.
10. King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and note-taking review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303-323.
11. Kuder, G. F., & Richadson, M. W. (1937). The theory of estimation of reliability. Psy- chometrika, 2, 151-160.
12. Long, J. D., & Long, E.W. (1987). Enhancing student achievement through metacognitive training. Journal of Developmental Education, 11, 2-5.
13. Nairne, J. S., & Widner, R. L. (1987). Generation effects with nonwords: The role of test appropriateness, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 13, 164-171.
14. Oosterhoff, A. (2001). Classroom applications of educational measurement (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
15. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-focused training and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
16. Paris, S. G., Wixson, K. K., & Palincsar, A. S. (1986). Instructional approaches to reading comprehension. Review of Research in Education, 13, 91-128.
17. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
18. Van Blerkom, D. (2006). College study skills: Becoming a strategic learner (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
19. Van Blerkom, M. L., & Van Blerkom, D. L. (2004). Self-monitoring strategies used by developmental and non-developmental college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 34 (2), 45-60.
20. Wade, C., & Thvris, C. (2003). Psychology (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87-95.
22. Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Students’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp.297-314). New York: Mcmillian.