Development of "extended radical retropubic prostatectomy": A surgical technique for improving margin positive rates in prostate cancer

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 281-286

  Miyake, H ^a   Fujimoto, H ^b   Komiyama, M ^b   Fujisawa, M ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biochemical recurrence; Extended radical retropubic prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Surgical margin

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXTENDED RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; HUMAN; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SEMINAL VESICLE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETHRA;

AGED; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 76449111576     PISSN: 07487983     EISSN: 15322157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ohori M., Kattan M., Scardino P.T., et al. Radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate. Mod Pathol 17 (2004) 349-359
2. Hull G.W., Rabbani F., Abbas F., et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 167 (2002) 528-534
3. Khan M.A., and Partin A.W. Surgical margin status after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 95 (2005) 281-284
4. Chang S.S., and Cookson M.S. Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. Urology 68 (2006) 249-252
5. Sofer M., Hamilton-Nelson K.L., Civantos F., et al. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression. J Urol 167 (2002) 2453-2456
6. Karakiewicz P.I., Eastham J.A., Graefen M., et al. Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology 66 (2005) 1245-1250
7. Kausik S.J., Blute M.L., Sebo T.J., et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 95 (2002) 1215-1219
8. Graefen M. The positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy-why do we still not really know what it means?. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 199-201
9. Stephenson R.A., Middleton R.G., and Abbott T.M. Wide excision (nonnerve sparing) radical retropubic prostatectomy using an initial perirectal dissection. J Urol 157 (1997) 251-255
10. Soulie M., Seguin P., Benoit J., et al. Impact of a modified apical dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy on the occurrence of positive surgical margins: a comparative study in 212 patients. Urology 58 (2001) 217-221
11. Ward J.F., Zincke H., Bergstralh E.J., et al. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 172 (2004) 1328-1332
12. Dussinger A.M., Beck S.D., Cheng L., et al. Does wide primary perirectal dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy alter pathologic and biochemical outcomes?. Urology 66 (2005) 95-100
13. Klein E.A., Kupelian P.A., Tuason L., et al. Initial dissection of the lateral fascia reduces the positive margin rate in radical prostatectomy. Urology 51 (1998) 766-773
14. Richman M., McLaughlin S., Maygarden S., et al. Initial incision of lateral pelvic fascia and early ligation of vascular pedicles during radical prostatectomy: potential to reduce positive margin rates. BJU Int 95 (2005) 40-45
15. Serni S., Masieri L., Lapini A., et al. A low incidence of positive surgical margins in prostate cancer at high risk of extracapsular extension after a modified anterograde radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 93 (2004) 279-283
16. Walsh P.C. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J Urol 163 (2000) 1802-1807
17. Myers R.P. Improving the exposure of the prostate in radical retropubic prostatectomy: longitudinal bunching of the deep venous plexus. J Urol 142 (1989) 1282-1284
18. Miyake H., Sakai I., Ishimura T., et al. Significance of cancer detection in the anterior lateral horn on systematic prostate biopsy: the effect on pathological findings of radical prostatectomy specimens. BJU Int 93 (2004) 57-59
19. Sakai I., Harada K., Hara I., et al. A comparison of the biological features between prostate cancers arising in the transition and peripheral zones. BJU Int 96 (2005) 528-532
20. Sakai I., Harada K., Hara I., et al. Intussusception of the bladder neck does not promote early restoration to urinary continence after non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Urol 12 (2005) 275-279