Radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate

Modern Pathology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 349-359

  Ohori, Makoto ^a   Kattan, Michael ^a   Scardino, Peter T ^a   Wheeler, Thomas M ^a,b  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Pathologic stage; Prostate carcinoma; Radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL FEATURE; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; NOMOGRAM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; SEMINAL VESICLE; TUMOR VOLUME; ADENOCARCINOMA; CANCER INVASION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 4344642010     PISSN: 08933952     EISSN: 15300285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800056     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate: being of study of 40 cases and presentation a radical operation which was carried out in 4 cases. Bull John's Hopkins Hospital 1905;16:315-321.
2. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982;128:492-497.
3. Hall GS, Kramer CE, Epstein JI. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. A comparative analysis of sampling methods. Am J Surg Pathol 1992;16:315-324.
4. Schmid HP, McNeal JE. An abbreviated standard procedure for accurate tumor volume estimation in prostate cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 1992;16:184-191.
5. Grossfeld GD, Chang JJ, Broering JM, et al. Does the completeness of prostate sampling predict outcome for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy?: data from the CAPSURE database. Urology 2000;56:430-435.
6. Hollenbeck BK, Bassily N, Wei JT, et al. Whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens do not increase detection of adverse pathological features. J Urol 2000;164:1583-1586.
7. Hollenbeck BK, Rubin MA. Prostate sampling to predict radical prostatectomy outcome. Urology 2001;57:394-395.
8. True L. Surgical pathology examination of the prostate gland. Practice survey by American Society of Clinical Pathologists. 1994;102:572-579.
9. Mazzucchelli R, Montironi R, Preziozo D, et al. Surgical pathology examination of radical prostatectomy specimens. Updated protocol based on the Italian TAP study. Anticancer Res 2001;21:3599-3607.
10. Hollenbeck BK, Bassily N, Wei JT, et al. Whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens do not increase detection of adverse pathological features. J Urol 2000;164:1583-1586.
11. Sehdev AE, Pan CC, Epstein JI. Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 2001;32:494-499.
12. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, et al. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1992;148(Part 1):331-337.
13. Aihara M, Wheeler TM, Ohori M, et al. Heterogeneity of prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 1994;43:60-66, discussion 66-67.
14. Wheeler T, Lebovitz RM. Fresh tissue harvest for research from prostatectomy specimens. Prostate 1994;25:274-279.
15. Wheeler TM, Dillioglugil O, Kattan MW, et al. Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer. Hum Pathol 1998;29:856-862.
16. Epstein JI. Pathologic assessment of the surgical specimen. Urol Clin North Am 2001;28:567-594.
17. Ohori M, Scardino PT, Lapin SL, et al. The mechanisms and prognostic significance of seminal vesicle involvement by prostate cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17:1252-1261.
18. Soh S, Arakawa A, Suyama K, et al. The prognosis of patients with seminal vesicle involvement (SVI) depends upon the level of extraprostatic extension (EPE). Abstract #1141. J Urol 1998;159:296A
19. Am J Clin Pathol 102:572-579.
20. Epstein JI, Partin AW, Potter SR, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicle: prognostic stratification based on pathologic parameters. Urology 2000;56:283-288.
21. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Hensen DE, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 5th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997.
22. Srigley JR, Amin MB, Bostwick DG, et al. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinomas of the prostate gland: a basis for checklists. Cancer Committee. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:1034-1039.
23. Mazzucchelli R, Montironi R, Preziozo D, et al. Surgical pathology examination of radical prostatectomy specimens. Updated protocol based on the Italian TAP study. Anticancer Res 2001;21:3599-3607.
24. Leibovich BC, Engen DE, Patterson DE, et al. Benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with a positive surgical margin. J Urol 2000;163:1178-1182.
25. Gleason DF. Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966;50:125-128.
26. Allsbrook W, Mangold K, Johnson M, et al. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists. Hum Pathol 2001;32:74-80.
27. Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Yemoto CM, et al. Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer. JAMA 1999;281:1395-1400.
28. Byar DP, Mostofi FK. Carcinoma of the prostate: prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical prostatectomies. Examined by the stepsection technique. Cancer 1972;30:5-13.
29. Villers A, McNeal JE, Redwine EA, et al. The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 1989;142:763-768.
30. Bastacky SI, Walsh PC, Esptein JI. Relationship between perineural tumor invasion on needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy capsular penetration in clinical stage B adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17:336-341.
31. Egan AJ, Bostwick DG. Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis. Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:1496-1500.
32. Bonin SR, Hanlon AL, Lee WR, et al. Evidence of increased failure in the treatment of prostate carcinoma patients who have perineural invasion treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. Cancer 1997;79:75-80.
33. Ravery V, Boccon-Gibod LA, Meudemans A, et al. Predictive value of pathological features for progression after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 1994;26:197-201.
34. Maru N, Ohori M, Kattan MW, et al. Prognostic significance of the diameter of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. Hum Pathol 2001;32:828-833.
35. Humphrey PA, Vollner RT. Percentage carcinoma as a measure of prostatic tumor size in radical prostatectomy tissues. Mod Pathol 1997;10:326-333.
36. Wilcox G, Soh S, Chakraborty S, et al. Patterns of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia associated with clinically aggressive prostate cancer. Hum Pathol 1998;29:1119-1123.
37. Rubin MA, Dunn R, Kambham N, et al. Should a Gleason score be assigned to a minute focus of carcinoma on prostate biopsy? Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:1634-1640.
38. Dawkins HJ, Sellner LN, Turbett GR, et al. Distinction between intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), high-grade dysplasia (PIN), and invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma, using molecular markers of cancer progression. Prostate 2000;44:265-270.
39. Kattan M, Eastham J, Stapleton A, et al. A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:766-771.
40. Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1499-1507.