Pre-service English teachers in blended learning environment in respect to their learning approaches

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 157-164

  Yilmaz, M Betül ^a   Orhan, Feza ^a  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Learning approach; Teacher training

Indexed keywords

EID: 76449086934     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beattie, V., Collins, B., & McInnes, B. (1997, March). Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6 (1), pp. 1-12.
2. Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education, 18 (1), pp.57-75.
3. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. (2001, March). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire:R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psycology, 71 (1), pp. 133-149.
4. Boekaerts, M. (1996). Personality and the psychology of learning. European Journal of Personality, 10 (5), pp. 377-404.
5. Burton, L. J. and Nelson, L. (2006). The relationships between personality, approaches to learning, and academic success in first-year psychology distance education students. In: 2006 Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Annual Conference, Perth, Australia. Online: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/3210/1/Burton_Nelson.pdf
6. Dart, B. C., Burnett, P. C., Purdie, N., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J. & Smith, D. (2000). Students' conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. Journal of Educational Research, 93 (4), pp. 262-270.
7. Diseth, Å. (2007a). Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51 (2), pp. 185-204.
8. Diseth, Å. (2007b). Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher Education, 32 (3), pp. 373-388.
9. Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, pp. 1907-1920
10. Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O'Hara, (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22 (4), pp. 244-256.
11. Ennis-Cole, D. L., & Lawhon, T. (2004). Teaching, Technology and Support in the New Millennium: A Guide for New Community College Teachers. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28 (7), pp. 583-592.
12. Entwistle, N. (1997). Reconstituting approaches to learning: A response to Webb. Higher Education, 33 (2), pp. 213-218.
13. European Commission. (1991). Memorandum on open distance learning in the European Community. Memorandum.
14. Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6).
15. Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2005). 'Distance education' and 'e-learning': Not the same thing. Higher Education, 49 (4), pp. 467-493.
16. Haefner, J. (2000). Opinion: the importance of being synchronous. Academic Writing. Available at: http://wac.colostate.edu/aw/teaching/haefner2000.htm. Accessed October 12, 2006.
17. Heinze, A., & Procter, C. (2006). Online communication and information technology education. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, pp. 235-249.
18. Laurillard, D. (1996). The changing university. A Forum for the Instructional Technology Community http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper13/paper13.html Accessed October 12, 2006.
19. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I - Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, pp. 4-11.
20. Mayya, S.S., Rao, A.K., & Ramnarayan, K. (2004). Learning approaches, learning difficulties and academic performance of undergraduate students of physiotherapy. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Science and Practice. 2 (4). http://ijahsp.nova.edu
21. Minbashian, A., Huon, G. F., & Bird, D. K. (2004). Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams. Higher Education, 47, pp. 161-176.
22. Mortera-Gutiérrez, F. (2006). Faculty Best Practices Using Blended Learning in E-Learning and Face-to-Face Instruction. International Journal on E-Learning, 5 (3), pp. 313-337.
23. Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (3), pp. 227-233.
24. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Relational perspectives on higher education teaching and learning in the science. Studies in Science Education, 33 (1), pp. 31-60.
25. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers'approaches to teaching and students'approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, pp. 57-70.
26. Ramsden, P. (1991). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
27. Reay, J. (2001). Blended Learning-a fusion for the future. Knowledge Management Review, 4 (3), p.6.
28. ® Teach to the Future Brings Together Microsoft and Other Industry Leaders in Half-Billion Dollar Commitment to Improve Student Learning. Available at: http://www.csrwire.com/News/58.html Accessed October 12, 2006
29. Sands, P. (2002). Inside outside, upside downside strategies for connecting online and face-to-face instruction in hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8 (6).
30. Wong, J. J. (2006). Traditional versus hybrid courses. International Journal of Learning 13 (8), pp. 163-170.
31. Young, J. R. (2002). 'Hybrid' teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48 (28), p. 33.