Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement

Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 185-204

  Diseth, Åge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047126449     PISSN: 00313831     EISSN: 14701170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00313830701191654     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arbuckle (1999) AMOS users' guide version 4.0, SPSS Corporation, Chicago
2. Bentler, P. M. (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, pp. 238-246.
3. Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models, pp. 445-455. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
4. Byrne, B. M. (1989) A primer for LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models, Springer-Verlag, New York
5. Byrne, B. M. (2001) Structural equation modelling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming, Lawrence Erlbaum, London
6. Campbell, J. P. (1990) Modelling the performance prediction in industrial and organizational development. Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology, pp. 687-732. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto
7. Cohen, P. A. (1981) Student rating of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51:3, pp. 281-309.
8. Diseth, Å. (2001) Validation of a Norwegian version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45:4, pp. 381-394.
9. Diseth, Å. (2003) Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17, pp. 143-155.
10. Diseth, Å. and Martinsen (2003) Approaches to learning, cognitive style and academic achievement. Educational Psychology
11. Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K. and Ferguson, J. (2004) The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36:8, pp. 1907-1920.
12. Entwistle, N. (1987) A model of the teaching-learning process. Improving learning: New perspectives, pp. 178-198. Kogan Page, London
13. Entwistle, N. (1989) Approaches to studying and course perceptions: The case of the disappearing relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 14, pp. 156-157.
14. Entwistle, N. J. (1997) The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST), Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh
15. Entwistle, N. and Ramsden, P. (1983) Understanding student learning, Croom Helm, London
16. Entwistle, N. and Tait, H. (1990) Approaches to learning, evaluation of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, pp. 169-194.
17. Entwistle, N., Tait, H. and McCune, V. (2000) Patterns of response to an approach to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15:1, pp. 33-48.
18. Fransson, A. (1977) On qualitative differences in learning: IV - Effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, pp. 244-257.
19. Hu, L. -T. and Bentler, P. M. (1995) Evaluating model fit. Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications, pp. 76-99. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
20. Hu, L. -T. and Bentler, P. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, pp. 1-55.
21. Jöreskog, K. G. (1993) Testing structural equation models. Testing structural equation models, pp. 294-317. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
22. Kember, D. and Leung, D. Y. P. (1998) Influences upon students' perceptions of workload. Educational Psychology, 18, pp. 293-307.
23. Lawless, C. J. and Richardson, J. T. E. (2002) Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education. Higher Education, 44, pp. 257-282.
24. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K. and Simons, R. (2002) University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27:1, pp. 27-52.
25. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. and Sugawara, H. M. (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modelling. Psychological Methods, 1, pp. 130-149.
26. Marsh, H. W. (1987) Students' evaluation of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, pp. 253-388.
27. Marsh, H. W. (1991) Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83:2, pp. 285-296.
28. Marton, F. and Söljö, R. (1976) On qualitative differences in learning: I - Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, pp. 4-11.
29. Minnaert, A. and Janssen, P. J. (1992) Success and progress in higher education: A structural model of studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, pp. 184-192.
30. Newble, D. and Clarke, R. (1987) Approaches to learning in a traditional and an innovative medical school. Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology, pp. 39-48. Open University Press, Milton Keynes
31. Ramsden, P. (1979) Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8, pp. 411-427.
32. Ramsden, P. (1991) A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, pp. 129-150.
33. Ramsden, P. (1992) Learning to teach in higher education, Routledge, London
34. Ramsden, P. and Entwistle, N. (1981) Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, pp. 368-383.
35. Richardson, J. T. E. and Price, L. (2003) Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in electronically delivered courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34:1, pp. 45-56.
36. Riding, R. and Rayner, S. (1998) Cognitive styles and learning strategies, David Fulton, London
37. Stringer, M. and Irwing, P. (1998) Students' evaluation of teaching effectiveness: A structural modelling approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, pp. 409-426.
38. Trigwell, K. and Prosser, M. (1991) Improving the quality of student learing: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, pp. 251-266.
39. Westman, M. and Eden, D. (1996) The inverted-U relationship between stress and performance: A field study. Work and Stress, 10:2, pp. 165-173.
40. Wilson, K. L., Lizzio, A. and Ramsden, P. (1997) The development, validation and appreciation of the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22, pp. 33-53.