In silico screening of protein-protein interactions with all-to-all rigid docking and clustering: An application to pathway analysis

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 991-1012

  Matsuzaki, Yuri ^a   Matsuzaki, Yusuke ^a   Sato, Toshiyuki ^b   Akiyama, Yutaka ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b MIZUHO INFORMATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

High performance computing; Pathway analysis; Protein docking; Protein protein interaction

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 76349100737     PISSN: 02197200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219720009004461     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Fields S, Song O, A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions, Nature 340:245-246, 1989.
2. Chen R, Weng Z, Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics, Proteins 47:281-294, 2002.
3. Chen R, Weng Z, A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking, Proteins 51:397-408, 2003.
4. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z, ZDOCK: An initial-stage protein-docking algorithm, Proteins 52:80-87, 2003.
5. Ben-Zeev E, Kowalsman N, Ben-Shimon A, Segal D, Atarot T, Noivirt O, Shay T, Eisenstein M, Docking to single-domain and multiple-domain proteins: Old and new challenges, Proteins 60:195-201, 2005.
6. Heifetz A, Pal S and Smith GR, Protein-protein docking: Progress in CAPRI rounds 6-12 using a combination of methods: The introduction of steered solvated molecular dynamics, Proteins 69:816-822, 2007.
7. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, and Vakser IA, Molecular surface recognition: Determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 89:2195-2199, 1992.
8. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJ, Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information, J Mol Biol 272:106-120, 1997.
9. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJE, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ, CAPRI: A critical assessment of PRedicted interactions, Proteins 52:2-9, 2003.
10. Jackson RM, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ, Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: Application to the docking problem, J Mol Biol 276:265-285, 1998.
11. Moont G, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ, Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes, Proteins 35:364-373, 1999.
12. Li L, Chen R,Weng Z, RDOCK: Refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions, Proteins 53:693-707, 2003.
13. Pierce B and Weng Z, ZRANK: Reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function, Proteins 67:1078-1086, 2007.
14. Kentner D, Sourjik V, Dynamic map of protein interactions in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway, Mol Syst Biol 5:238, 2009.
15. D'haeseleer P, Liang S, Somogyi R, Genetic network inference: From co-expression clustering to reverse engineering, Bioinformatics 16:707-726, 2000.
16. Werner T, Bioinformatics applications for pathway analysis of microarray data, Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:50-54, 2008.
17. Tsukamoto K, Yoshikawa T, Hourai Y, Fukui K, Akiyama Y, Development of an affinity evaluation and prediction system by using the shape complementarity characteristic between proteins, J Bioinform Comput Biol 6:1133-1156, 2008.
18. Yoshikawa T, Tsukamoto K, Hourai Y, Fukui K, Improving the accuracy of an affinity prediction method by using statistics on shape complementarity between proteins, J Chem Inf Model 49:693-703, 2009.
19. Wadhams GH, Armitage JP, Making sense of it all: Bacterial chemotaxis, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:1024-1037, 2004.
20. Baker MD, Wolanin PM, Stock JB, Systems biology of bacterial chemotaxis, Curr Opin Microbiol 9:187-192, 2006.
21. Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, Anderson R, Chen R, Janin J and Weng Z, Proteinprotein docking benchmark 2.0: An update, Proteins 60:214-216, 2005.
22. Kanehisa M, Goto S, KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes, Nucleic Acids Res 28:27-30, 2000.
23. Fujibuchi W, Goto S, Migimatsu H, Uchiyama I, Ogiwara A, Akiyama Y, Kanehisa M, DBGET/LinkDB: An integrated database retrieval system, Pac Symp Biocomput, pp. 683-694, 1998.
24. Hwang H, Pierce B, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z, Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0, Proteins 73:705-709, 2008.
25. http://zlab.bu.edu/zdock/
26. Wiehe K, Pierce B, Tong WW, Hwang H, Mintseris J, Weng Z, The performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in rounds 6-11 of CAPRI, Proteins 69:719-725, 2007.
27. Chen R, Weng Z, A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking, Proteins 51:397-408, 2003.
28. Lorenzen S, Zhang Y, Identification of near-native structures by clustering protein docking conformations, Proteins, 68:187-194, 2007.
29. Matsuzaki Y, Matsuzaki Y, Sato T, Akiyama Y, Development of post-docking system for protein-protein interaction prediction, IPSJ SIG Tech Rep 2008(58):17-20, 2008.
30. Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Stark M, Chaffron S, Creevey C, Muller J, Doerks T, Julien P, Roth A, Simonovic M, Bork P, Von Mering C, STRING 8 - a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms, Nucleic Acids Res, 37:D412-416, 2009.
31. Kakuta M, Nakamura S, Shimizu K, Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using only sequence information and using both sequence and structural information, IPSJ Trans Bioinform 49(SIG5):25-35, 2008.
32. Kuchaiev O, Rasajski M, Higham DJ, Przulj N, Geometric de-noising of protein- protein interaction networks, PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000454, 2009.
33. Jansen R, Yu H, Greenbaum D, Kluger Y, Krogan NJ, Chung S, Emili A, Snyder M, Greenblatt JF, Gerstein M, A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein- protein interactions from genomic data, Science 302:449-453, 2003.
34. Lin X, Liu M, Chen XW, Assessing reliability of protein-protein interactions by integrative analysis of data in model organisms, BMC Bioinformatics 10 Suppl 4:S5, 2009.
35. Park S, Chao X, Gonzalez-Bonet G, Beel BD, Bilwes AM, Crane BR, Structure and function of an unusual family of protein phosphatases: The bacterial chemotaxis proteins CheC and CheX, Mol Cell 16:563-574, 2004.
36. Szurmant H, Muff TJ, Ordal GW, Bacillus subtilis CheC and FliY are members of a novel class of CheY-P-hydrolyzing proteins in the chemotactic signal transduction cascade, J Biol Chem 279:21787-21792, 2004.
37. Rosario MM, Ordal GW, CheC and CheD interact to regulate methylation of Bacillus subtilis methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, Mol Microbiol 21:511-518, 1996.
38. Chao X, Muff TJ, Park S, Zhang S, Pollard AM, Ordal GW, Bilwes AM, Crane BR, A receptor-modifying deamidase in complex with a signaling phosphatase reveals reciprocal regulation, Cell 124:561-571, 2006.
39. Akiyama Y, Sato T, Matsuzaki Y, Matsuzaki Y, MEGADOCK - a rapid screening system for all-to-all protein docking analysis with precalculated fourier library of protein structures, The 2008 Annu Conf Jpn Soc Bioinform (JSBi2008), Osaka, Japan, 2008.
40. Tsai CJ, Kumar S, Ma B, Nussinov R, Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function, Protein Sci 8:1181-1190, 1999.
41. Wako H, Kato M, Endo S, ProMode: A database of normal mode analyses on protein molecules with a full-atom model, Bioinformatics 20:2035-2043, 2004.