Perioperative outcomes of open radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in Asian men: Comparison of two initial series by the same surgeon

International Braz J Urol

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 151-157

  Leewansangtong, Sunai ^a   Wiangsakunna, Wirat ^a   Taweemankongsap, Tawatchai ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Prostate neoplasms; Prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BLOOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ETHNOLOGY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 76249133765     PISSN: 16775538     EISSN: 16776119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-55382009000200004     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR, Epstein JI, Walsh PC: Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am. 2001; 28: 555-65.
2. Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT: Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol. 2002; 167: 528-34.
3. Klevecka V, Burmester L, Musch M, Roggenbuck U, Kroepfl D: Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2007; 79: 217-25.
4. Touijer K, Eastham JA, Secin FP, Romero Otero J, Serio A, Stasi J, et al.: Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005. J Urol. 2008; 179: 1811-7; discussion 1817.
5. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, DO M, Ho K, Dorschner W, Waldkirch E, et al.: Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures. J Urol. 2005; 174: 1271-5; discussion 1275.
6. Goeman L, Salomon L, La De Taille A, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Yiou R, et al.: Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients. World J Urol. 2006; 24: 281-8.
7. Lepor H: Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Rev Urol. 2005; 7: 115-27.
8. Ghavamian R, Knoll A, Boczko J, Melman A: Comparison of operative and functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: single surgeon experience. Urology. 2006; 67: 1241-6.
9. Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Naspro R, Riva M, Centemero A, Zanoni M, et al.: Intra-and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol. 2006; 50: 98-104.
10. Walsh PC: Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol. 1998; 160: 2418-24.
11. Ferguson GG, Ames CD, Weld KJ, Yan Y, Venkatesh R, Landman J: Prospective evaluation of learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: identification of factors improving operative times. Urology. 2005; 66: 840-4.