Comparison of operative and functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: Single surgeon experience

Urology

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1241-1246

  Ghavamian, Reza ^a   Knoll, Abraham ^a   Boczko, Judd ^a   Melman, Arnold ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILDENAFIL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POTENCY DISORDER; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; SURGEON; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33744523763     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.017     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Guillonneau B., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations. Prostate 39 (1997) 71-75
2. Guillonneau B., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. the Montsouris experience. J Urol 163 (2000) 418-422
3. Abbou C.C., Salomon L., Hoznek A., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. preliminary results. Urology 55 (2000) 630-634
4. Rassweiler J., Stenker L., Seeman O., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique. an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 166 (2001) 2101-2108
5. Bollens R., Vanden Bossche M., Roumeguere T., et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 40 (2001) 65-69
6. Begg C.B., Reidel E.R., Bach P.B., et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 346 (2002) 1138-1144
7. Salomon L., Levrel O., de la Taille A., et al. Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach. 12 years of experience in one center. Eur Urol 42 (2002) 104-111
8. Bhayani S.B., Pavlovich C.P., Hsu T.S., et al. Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence. laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 61 (2003) 612-616
9. Rassweiler J., Seeman O., Schulze M., et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy. a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169 (2003) 1689-1693
10. Slabaugh Jr. T.K., and Marshall F.F. A comparison of minimally invasive open and laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 172 (2004) 2545-2548
11. Walsh P.C. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh P.C., Retik A.B., Vaughn Jr. E.D., et al. (Eds). Campbell's Urology. 8th ed. vol 4 (2002), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 3107-3130
12. Stolzenburg J.U., Do M., Rabenalt R., et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 169 (2003) 2066-2071
13. Ghavamian R., Schenk G., Hoenig D.M., et al. Overcoming the steep learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. single surgeon experience. J Endourol 18 (2004) 567-571
14. Gill I.S., and Zippe C.D. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. technique. Urol Clin North Am 28 (2001) 423-436
15. Guillonneau B., El-Fettouh H., Baumert H., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. oncological evaluation after 1000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169 (2003) 1261-1266
16. Wieder J.A., and Soloway M.S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 160 (1998) 299-315
17. Ward J.F., Zincke H., Bergstralh E.J., et al. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 172 (2004) 1328-1332
18. Swaindle P., Eastham J.A., Ohori M., et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 174 (2005) 903-907
19. Fromont G., Guilloneau B., Validire P., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. preliminary pathological evaluation. Urology 60 (2002) 661-665
20. Katz R., Salomon L., Hoznek A., et al. Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 168 (2002) 2078-2082
21. Guillonneau B., Cathelineau X., Doublet J.D., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 43 (2002) 123-133
22. Walsh P.C., Marschke P., Ricker A., et al. Patient reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 55 (2000) 58-61
23. Lepor H., Kaci L., and Xue X. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J Urol 171 (2004) 1212-1215
24. Steiner M.S., Morton R.A., and Walsh P.C. Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence. J Urol 145 (1991) 512-515
25. Lepor H., and Kaci L. The impact of open radical retropubic prostatectomy on continence and lower urinary tract symptoms. a prospective assessment using validated self-administered outcome instruments. J Urol 171 (2004) 1216-1219
26. Roumeguere T., Bollens R., Vanden Bossche Rochet D., et al. Radical prostatectomy. a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches. World J Urol 20 (2003) 360-366
27. Ahlering T.E., Woo D., Eichel L., et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy. a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 63 (2003) 819-822
28. Joseph J.V., Vincente I., Madeb R., et al. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 96 (2005) 39-42