The 'enterprise of science': Construction and reconstruction of social capital around nano R&D

International Journal of Nanotechnology

Volumn 7, Issue 2-3, 2010, Pages 121-136

  Vinck, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Cluster; Controversy; Ethnography; Institutional entrepreneur; Nanotechnology; Social capital; Social cohesion; Storytelling; Success story; Tradition

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

CLUSTER; CONTROVERSY; ETHNOGRAPHY; INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEUR; SOCIAL CAPITALS; SOCIAL COHESION; STORYTELLING; SUCCESS STORY; TRADITION;

NANOSCIENCE;

EID: 76249130480     PISSN: 14757435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJNT.2010.031306     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hughes, T. (1993) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore; London.
2. Vinck, D. (2003) Everyday Engineering. Ethnography of Design and Innovation, MIT Press, Boston.
3. Robinson, D., Rip, A. and Mangematin, V. (2007) 'Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology', Research Policy, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp.871-879.
4. Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon and Schuster, New York.
5. Friedkin, N. (2004) 'Social cohesion', Ann. Rev. Sociol., No.30, pp.409-425.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1986) 'The forms of capital', in J. Richardson (Ed.): Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp.241-258, Greenwood Press, New York.
7. See the officials' discourses from François d'Aubert (2004), delegated minister for the Research department (http://www.recherche.gouv.fr/ budget/2005/priorite2.pdf) and the Conseil Stratégique des Technologies de l'Information (CSTI) (http://www.csti.pm.gouv.fr).
8. Robinson, D., Rip, A. and Mangematin, V. (2007) 'Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology', Research Policy, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp.872-880.
9. Bozeman, B., Laredo, P. and Mangematin, V. (2007) 'Understanding the emergence and deployment of 'nano' S&T', Research Policy, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp.807-812.
10. Powell, W., Koput, K., Bowie, J. and Smith-Doerr, L. (2002) 'A spatial clustering of science and capital: accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships', Regional Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp.291-305.
11. Mangematin, V., Rip, A., Delamarle, A. and Robinson, D. (2006) 'The role of regional institutional entrepreneurs in the emergence of clusters in nanotechnologies', Workshop: Mapping the Emergence of Nanotechnologies and Understanding the Engine of Growth and Development, Grenoble, 1-3 March.
12. Grossetti, M. and Mounier-Kuhn, P. (1995) 'Les débuts de l'informatique dans les universités - un moment de la différenciation des pôles scientifiques français', Revue Française de Sociologie, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp.295-324.
13. Pestre, D. (1990) 'Louis Néel, le magnétisme et Grenoble. Récit de la création d'un empirephysicien dans la province Française, 1940-1965', Cahiers pour l'histoire du CNRS, Éditions du CNRS, No.8, p.188.
14. The historical narratives of the local actors are not heroic poems but they are a narration celebrating heroic feats and legendary heroes. Real or fictitious events are narrated in a kind of elevated style, talking about impressive actions and surpassing the ordinary. The actor's narration refers to a series of events suggesting of a literary epic. It talks about a complex tradition mixing scientific, social and political representations. The repetition of this historical narration creates a web of representation for the actors who seem to share some emotion listening or counting this narrative.
15. Such historical narrative is also a selection of events chosen by the actors. It overlooks other facts and alternative historical narratives. Sometimes, a different story is told by marginalised actors (e.g., a small poster in an exhibition tracing the history of the paper industry and underlining that Grenoble is not just about nanotechnologies or a researcher in medical science who refuses to reduce the city's history to hydroelectricity and electronics alone or a group of opponents telling the tale of century-long form of connivance between industry, research, defence and elected officials).
16. Available at http://www.lesechos.fr/info/france/300220549.htm.
17. Grossetti, M. (1995) Science, Industrie et Territoire, Presses Universitaires du Mirail, Toulouse.
18. Adair-Toteff, C. (2005) 'Max Weber's charisma', Journal of Classical Sociology, Vol.5, No.2, pp.189-204.
19. Callon, M. (1986) 'Some elements for a sociology of translation. Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St-Brieuc Bay', in J. Law (Ed.): Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge?, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
20. Czarniawska, B. and Bernward, J. (1996) 'Travels of ideas', in B. Czarniawska and G. Sevón (Eds.): Translating Organizational Change, pp.13-48, de Gruyter, Berlin.
21. Lawrence, T., Hardy, C. and Phillips, N. (2002) 'Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: the emergence of proto-institutions', Academy of Management Journal, Vol.45, No.1, pp.281-290.
22. Vinck, D. (2005) 'Ethnographie d'un laboratoire de recherche technologique: analyse de la médiation entre recherche publique et appropriation privée', Sciences de la Société, No.66, pp.73-91.
23. The texts published by this group of opponents are available at http://www.piecesetmaindoeuvre.com/.
24. Although it is not the topic of this paper, the question of public trust is important for NST, including when it appears to be relatively high and related to enthusiasm and pride, as in the present case. The opponents can be seen to have little impact on lay people. Public trust, therefore, is not that important in terms of science policy. However, when it comes to developing new products and markets, public trust plays a bigger role. For a theoretical discussion of public trust, see Chess, C. and Purcell, K. (1999) 'Public participation and the environment. Do we know what works?', Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 33, No. 16, pp.2685-2692;
25. Sjöberg, L. (Ed.) ( 1987) Risk and Society, Allen & Unwin, London;
26. Sjöberg, L. (2000) 'Factors in risk perception', Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.1-11;
27. Slovic, P. (1993) 'Perceived risk, trust and democracy', Risk Analysis, No. 13, pp.675-682;
28. Slovic, P. (1986) 'Informing and educating the public about risk', Risk Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp.403-415.
29. Powell, D. and Leiss, W. (2004) Mad Cows and Mothers Milk. The Perils of Poor Risk Communication, McGill Queen's Press, Montréal.
30. Leiss, W. (2001) In the Chamber of Risks, Understanding Risk Controversies, McGill Queen's Press, Montréal.
31. Marris, C. (2001) 'Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. Stakeholders in the GMO debate often describe public opinion as irrational. But do they really understand the public?', EMBO Reports, Vol. 2, No. 7, pp.545-548.