Relocating the poor: Social capital and neighborhood resources

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 79-103

  Curley, Alexandra M ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOW INCOME POPULATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEIGHBORHOOD; POVERTY; SOCIAL CAPITAL; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; URBAN ECONOMY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 76249128746     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: 14679906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00475.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Place attachment 1992, Altman ILow S. Eds, New York, Plenum
2. Atkinson R. Neighbourhoods and the impacts of social mix: Crime, tenure diversification, and assisted mobility 2006, Tasmania, Australia, Housing and Community Research Unit, School of Sociology and Social Work, University of Tasmania
3. Blokland T. Urban bonds 2003, Cambridge, Polity
4. Blokland T, Savage M. Networked urbanism: Social capital in the city 2008, Aldershot, UK, Ashgate
5. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. Handbook of theory and research for sociology of education 1986, 241-258. Richardson J. In, Ed, pp, New York, Greenwood Press
6. Briggs X de S. Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate 1998, 9(1):177-221.
7. Brophy P, Smith R. Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 1997, 3(2):3-31.
8. Brown B, Perkins D D, Brown G. Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003, 23(3):259-271.
9. Brown P, Richman H. Neighborhood effects and state and local policy. Neighborhood poverty: Policy implications in studying neighborhoods 1997, Vol. II:164-181. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GAber L. In, Eds, pp, New York, Russell Sage Foundation
10. Buron L, Popkin S J, Levy D, Harris L E, Khadduri J. The HOPE VI resident tracking study 2002, Washington, DC, Urban Institute
11. Cantle T. Community cohesion: A report of the independent review team 2001, London, Home Office, Minister of State
12. Clampet-Lundquist S. HOPE VI relocation: Moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties. Housing Policy Debate 2004, 15(2):415-447.
13. Coleman J S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 1988, 94:S95-S120.
14. Curley A M. Maverick Gardens HOPE VI evaluation: Findings from in-depth interviews on phase I relocation 2004, Boston, MA, Center for Urban and Regional Policy, Northeastern University
15. Curley A M. Draining or gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2009, 26(2-3):227-247.
16. Curley A M. HOPE VI-A viable strategy for improving neighborhood conditions and resident self-sufficiency?. Housing Policy Debate 2010, 20(1). Forthcoming
17. Curley A M, Fitzgerald J. Fourth year evaluation of the Boston housing authority's HOPE VI project at Maverick Gardens 2006, Boston, MA, Center for Urban and Regional Policy, Northeastern University
18. Curley A M, Fitzgerald J. All we hoped for? Maverick HOPE VI final resident survey results 2007, Boston, MA, Center for Urban and Regional Policy, Northeastern University
19. Dekker K, Bolt G. Social cohesion in post-war estates in the Netherlands: Differences between socioeconomic and ethnic groups. Urban Studies 2005, 42(13):2447-2470.
20. Dekker K, Filipovic M. The influence of physical measures on social cohesion in large housing estates: Case studies in the Netherlands and Slovenia compared. RESTATE, Second Edition 2008, In
21. Fischer C S. To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city 1982, Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press
22. Forrest R, Kearns A. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighborhood. Urban Studies 2001, 38(12):2125-2143.
23. Fulkerson G M, Thompson G H. The evolution of a contested concept: A meta-analysis of social capital definitions and trends (1988-2006). Sociological Inquiry 2008, 78(4):536-557.
24. Granovetter M. Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers 1974, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
25. Greenbaum S. Social capital and deconcentration: Theoretical and policy paradoxes of the HOPE VI program. North American Dialogue 2002, 5(1):9-13.
26. Guest A M, Wierzbicki S K. Social ties at the neighborhood level: Two decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review 1999, 35(1):92-111.
27. Jencks C, Mayer S E. The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. Inner-city poverty in the United States 1990, 111-186. Lynn L, McGeary M. In, Eds, pp, Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences Press
28. Kleinhans R. Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: A review of recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2004, 19:367-390.
29. Kleinhans R, Priemus H, Engbersen G. Understanding social capital in recently restructured urban neighbourhoods: Two case studies in Rotterdam. Urban Studies 2007, 44(5-6):1069-1091.
30. Kleit R G. The role of neighborhood social networks in scattered-site public housing residents' search for jobs. Housing Policy Debate 2001, 12(3):541-573.
31. Kleit R G. HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing. Environment and Planning 2005, 37:1413-1441.
32. Kling J, Liebman J, Katz L. Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects 2005, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University
33. Lees L. Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance?. Urban Studies 2008, 45(12):2449-2470.
34. Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J, Kamerman S. Communities as place, face, and space: Provisions of services to poor, urban children and their families. Neighborhood poverty: Policy implications in studying neighborhoods 1997, Vol. II:182-205. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan G, Aber L. In, Eds, pp, New York, Russell Sage Foundation
35. Liebow E. Tally's corner: A study of Negro streetcorner men 1967, Boston, MA, Little, Brown
36. Livingston M, Bailey N, Kearns A. People's attachment to place: The influence of neighbourhood deprivation 2008, Glasgow, UK, Joseph Rowentree Foundation
37. Lofland L H. A world of strangers: Order and action in urban public space 1973, New York, Basic Books
38. Mesch G S, Manor O. Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior 1998, 30(4):504-519.
39. Morenoff J D, Sampson R J, Raudenbush S W. Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spacial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology 2001, 39(3):517-560.
40. Orr L, Feins J, Jacob R, Beecroft E, Sanbonmatsu L, Katz L. Moving to opportunity interim impacts evaluation 2003, Washington, D.C, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
41. Peterson R D, Krivo L J, Harris M A. Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter?. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2000, 37(1):31-63.
42. Pinkster F M. Localised social networks, socialisation and social mobility in a low-income neighbourhood in the Netherlands. Urban Studies 2007, 44(13):2587-2603.
43. Popkin S J, Levy D K, Harris L E, Comey J, Cunningham M K, Buron L F. The HOPE VI program: What about the residents?. Housing Policy Debate 2004, 15(2):385-414.
44. Portes A, Landolt P. The downside of social capital. American Prospect 1996, 26:18-22.
45. Social capital: Reviewing the concept and its policy implications 2003, Productivity Commission, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia
46. Putnam R D. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy 1993, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
47. Putnam R D. Bowling alone 2000, New York, Simon & Schuster
48. Putnam R D. E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century, the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Nordic Political Science Association 2007, 30(2):137-174.
49. Ross C E, Mirowsky J, Pribesh S. Disadvantage, disorder and urban mistrust. City & Community 2002, 1(1):59-82.
50. Saegert S, Winkel G. Social capital and the revitalization of New York City's distressed inner-city housing. Housing Policy Debate 1998, 9(1):17-60.
51. Saegert S, Winkel G. Crime, social capital, and community participation. American Journal of Community Psychology 2004, 34(3-4):219-233.
52. Sampson R J, Raudenbush S W, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997, 277(5328):918-924.
53. Skogan W G. Disorder and decline: Crime and spiral of decay in American neighborhoods 1990, Berkeley, University of California Press
54. Small M L. Neighborhood institutions as resource brokers: Childcare centers, interorganizational ties, and resource access among the poor. Social Problems 2006, 53(2):274-292.
55. Small M L, Jacobs E M, Massengill R P. Why organizational ties matter for neighborhood effects: A study of resource access through childcare centers. Social Forces 2008, 87(1):387-414.
56. Small M L, McDermott M. The presence of organizational resources in poor urban neighborhoods: An analysis of average and contextual effects. Social Forces 2006, 84(3):1697-1724.
57. Small M L, Newman K S. Urban poverty after the truly disadvantaged: The rediscovery of the family, the neighborhood, and culture. Annual Review of Sociology 2001, 27:23-45.
58. Smith R. Housing choice for HOPE VI relocatees 2002, Washington, DC, Urban Institute
59. Stack C. All our kin: Strategies for survival in a Black community 1974, New York, Harper and Row
60. Sztompka P. Trust: A sociological theory 1999, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
61. United States 2000 census summary file 4 2000a, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, U.S. Census Bureau
62. United States census 2000 summary file 1 2000b, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, U.S. Census Bureau
63. van Beckhoven E, van Kempen R. Social effects of urban restructuring: A case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies 2003, 18(6):853-875.
64. Van Bergeijk E, Bolt G, Van Kempen R. Social cohesion in deprived neighborhoods in the Netherlands: The effect of the use of neighborhood facilities 2008, April, York, UK
65. Van Kempen R. Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands 2008, April, York, UK
66. Vertovec S. New complexities of cohesion in Britain: Super-diversity, transnationalism, and civil-integration 2007, Wetherby, UK, Commission on Integration and Cohesion
67. Völker B, Flap H, Lindenberg S. When are neighbourhoods communities? Community in Dutch Neighbourhoods. European Sociological Review 2007, 23(1):99-114.
68. Wellman B. Physical place versus cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2001, 25(2):227-252.
69. Wilson W J. The truly disadvantaged 1987, Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press