Developing visual sensing strategies through next best view planning

2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 4001-4008

  Dunn, Enrique ^a   Van Den Berg, Jur ^a   Frahm, Jan Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D MODELS; AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; GEOMETRIC STRUCTURE; INCREMENTAL APPROACH; NEXT BEST VIEW; PATH-PLANNING; RESOURCE DEPLOYMENTS; ROBOT MOTION; STRUCTURE FROM MOTION; SYNTHETIC ENVIRONMENTS; VIEW PLANNING; VISUAL SENSING;

COMPUTER VISION; COST FUNCTIONS; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

SURFACE MEASUREMENT;

EID: 76249113893     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2009.5354179     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. P. S. Blaer and P. K. Allen. Two stage view planning for large-scale site modeling. In International Symposium on 3D Data Processing Visualization and Transmission, pages 814-821, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society.
2. S. Chen, Y. Li, J. Zhang, and W. Wang. Active Sensor Planning for Multiview Vision Tasks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
3. C. S. Fraser. Network design considerations for non-topographic photogrammetry. PERS, 50(8):1115-1126, 1984.
4. C. S. Fraser. Network design. In Close Range Photogrammetry and Machine Vision. (Ed. K. B. Atkinson). Whittles, Caithness. 371 pages, pages 256-281, 1996.
5. A. Hornung, B. Zeng, and L. Kobbelt. Image selection for improved multi-view stereo. In Proccedings of CVPR, pages 1-8, 2008.
6. K.-L. Low and A. Lastra. Efficient constraint evaluation algorithms for hierarchical next-best-view planning. In International Symposium on 3D Data Processing Visualization and Transmission, pages 830-837, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society.
7. E. Marchand and F. Chaumette. Active vision for complete scene reconstruction and exploration. PAMI, 21(1):65-72, 1999.
8. S. Mason. Heuristic reasoning strategy for automated sensor placement. PERS, 63(9):1093-1102, 1997.
9. J. Maver and R. Bajcsy. Occlusions as a guide for planning the next view. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(5):417-433, 1993.
10. T. Newman and A. Jain. Survey of automated visual inspection. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(2):231-262, 1995.
11. N. J. Nilsson. Principles of Artificial Intelligenc. Tioga Publishing Company, 1980.
12. G. Olague and R. Mohr. Optimal camera placement for accurate reconstructions. Pattern Recognition, 35(4):927-944, 2002.
13. R. Pito. A solution to the next best view problem for automated surface acquisition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(10):1016-1030, 1999.
14. R. Sablatnig, S. Tosovic, and M. Kampel. Next view planning for a combination of passive and active acquisition techniques. In Proceedings of 3DIM, page 6269, 2003.
15. W. R. Scott, G. Roth, and J.-F. Rivest. View planning for automated three-dimensional object reconstruction and inspection. ACM Comput. Surv., 35(1):64-96, 2003.
16. A. Stentz. Optimal and efficient path planning for partially-known environments. In In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3310-3317, 1994.
17. K. Tarabanis, P. Allen, and R. Stag. A survey of sensor planning in computer vision. IEEE Trans. on Rob. and Automat., 11(1):86-104, 1995.
18. S. Wenhardt, B. Deutsch, E. Angelopoulou, and H. Niemann. Active visual object reconstruction using d-, e-, and t-optimal next best views.
19. S. Wenhardt, B. Deutsch, J. Hornegger, H. Niemann, and J. Denzler. An information theoretic approach for next best view planning in 3-d reconstruction. In Proccedings of ICPR, 2006.
20. P. Whaite and F. Ferrie. Autonomous exploration: driven by uncertainty. PAMI, 19(3):193-205, 1997.