Reply to Bäuml and Hanslmayr: Adding or subtracting memories? The neural correlates of learned interference vs. memory inhibition

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Huber, David E ^a   Tomlinson, Tracy D ^b   Rieth, Cory A ^a   Davelaar, Eddy J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; LEARNING; LETTER; MEMORY; MEMORY SUPPRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; THINKING;

EID: 76249106821     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912815107     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Tomlinson TD, Huber DE, Rieth CA, Davelaar EJ (2009) An interference account of cueindependent forgetting in the no-think paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 15588-15593.
2. Bäuml KH, Hanslmayr S Forgetting in the no-think paradigm: Interference or inhibition? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, in press.
3. Anderson MC, et al. (2004) Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science 303:232-235.
4. Depue BE, Curran T, Banich MT (2007) Prefrontal regions orchestrate suppression of emotional memories via a two-phase process. Science 317:215-219.
5. Hanslmayr S, Leipold P, Pastötter B, Bäuml KH (2009) Anticipatory signatures of voluntary memory suppression. J Neurosci 29:2742-2747.
6. Stark CEL, Squire LR (2001) When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12760-12766.