An in vitro multi-parametric approach to measuring the effect of implant surface characteristics on cell behaviour

Biomedical Materials

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Davies, J T ^a   Lam, J ^b   Tomlins, P E ^b   Marshall, D ^a  

^a LGC   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE FORMATION; CELL ATTACHMENTS; CELL BEHAVIOURS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; ENGINEERED SURFACES; IMPLANT SURFACE; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; MACHINING TECHNIQUES; MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES; ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANTS; PARAMETRIC APPROACH; QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT; SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS; SURFACE CHARACTERIZATION;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY;

OSTEOCALCIN; TITANIUM; BIOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BONE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ANIMAL; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CHEMISTRY; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; SURFACE PROPERTY;

3T3 CELLS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 76249093645     PISSN: 17486041     EISSN: 1748605X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/1/015002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Shard A G and Tomlins P E 2006 Biocompatibility and the efficacy of medical implants Regen. Med. 1 789-800
2. Moroni L, de Wijn J R and van Blitterswijk C A 2008 Integrating novel technologies to fabricate smart scaffolds J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Edn 19 543-72
3. Zhang W, Luo Y, Wang H, Jiang J, Pu S and Chu P K 2008 Ag and Ag/N(2) plasma modification of polyethylene for the enhancement of antibacterial properties and cell growth/proliferation Acta Biomater. 4 2028-36
4. Brunette D M, Tengvall P, Textor M and Thomsen P 2001 Titanium in Medicine: Material Science, Surface Science, Engineering, Biological Responses and Medical Applications (Berlin: Springer) pp 53-7
5. Degidi M, Piattelli A and Carinci F 2006 Parallel screw cylinder implants: comparative analysis between immediate loading and two-stage healing of 1005 dental implants with a 2-year follow up Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 8 151-60
6. Pearce A I, Richards R G, Milz S, Schneider E and Pearce S G 2007 Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review Eur. Cell Mater. 13 1-10
7. Li L H, Kong Y M, Kim H W, Kim Y H, Kim H E, Heo S J and Koak J Y 2004 Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by micro-arc oxidation Biomaterials 25 2867-75
8. 2 films on Ti surfaces for bone-tissue implants J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 57 588-96
9. Ishizawa H and Ogino M 1999 Formation and characterization of anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29 65-72
10. Hanks C T, Wataha J C and Sun Z 1996 In vitro models of biocompatibility: a review Dent. Mater. 12 186-93
11. Pizzoferrato A, Ciapetti G, Stea S, Cenni E, Arciola C R, Granchi D and Savarino L 1994 Cell culture methods for testing biocompatibility Clin. Mater. 15 173-90
12. Hamilton D W, Wong K S and Brunette D M 2006 Microfabricated discontinuous-edge surface topographies influence osteoblast adhesion, migration, cytoskeletal organization, and proliferation and enhance matrix and mineral deposition in vitro Calcified Tissue Int. 78 314-25
13. Thevenot P, Hu W and Tang L 2008 Surface chemistry influences implant biocompatibility Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 8 270-80
14. Flemming R G, Murphy C J and Abrams G A 1999 Effects of synthetic micro-and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour Biomaterials 20 573
15. Shalabi M M, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof M A, Jansen J A and Creugers N H 2006 Implant surface roughness and bone healing J. Dent. Res. 85 496-500
16. Dalby M J, Gadegaard N, Curtis A S and Oreffo R O 2007 Nanotopographical control of human osteoprogenitor differentiation Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2 129-38
17. Chen C S, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides G M and Ingber D E 1997 Geometric control of cell life and death Science 276 1425-8
18. Boyan B D, Hummert T W, Dean D D and Schwartz Z 1996 Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response Biomaterials 17 137-146
19. Walboomers X F and Jansen J A 2001 Cell and tissue behaviour on micro-grooved surfaces Odontology 89 2-11
20. Hamilton D W and Brunette D M 2007 The effect of substratum topography on osteoblast adhesion mediated signal transduction and phosphorylation Biomaterials 28 1806-19
21. Buser D, Schenk R K, Steinemann S, Fiorellini J P, Fox C H and Stich H 1991 Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25 889-902
22. 2-gritblasted and Ca-P magnetron sputter coated implants placed into the trabecular bone of the goat Clin. Oral Implants Res. 11 314-24
23. Novaes A B Jr, Souza S L, de Oliveira P T and Souza A M 2002 Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 17 377-83
24. Macdonald W, Campbell P, Fisher J and Wennerberg A 2004 Variation in surface texture measurements J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 70 262-9
25. Monsees T K, Barth K, Tippelt S, Heidel K, Gorbunov A, Pompe W and Funk R H 2005 Effects of different titanium alloys and nanosize surface patterning on adhesion, differentiation, and orientation of osteoblast-like cells Cells Tissues Organs 180 81-95
26. Sollazzo V, Palmieri A, Pezzetti F, Scarano A, Martinelli M, Scapoli L, Massari L, Brunelli G, Caramelli E and Carinci F 2008 Genetic effect of anatase on osteoblast-like cells J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 85 29-36
27. Refai A K, Textor M, Brunette D M and Waterfield J D 2004 Effect of titanium surface topography on macrophage activation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 70 194-205
28. Hamilton D, Chehroudi B and Brunette D 2007 Comparative response of epithelial cells and osteoblasts to microfabricated tapered pit topographies in vitro and in vivo Biomaterials 28 2281-93