Diagnostic capability of macular parameters of Stratus OCT 3 in detection of early glaucoma

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 197-201

  Parikh, R S ^a   Parikh, S R ^b   Thomas, R ^b,c,d  

^a Bombay City Eye Institute & Research Centre   (India)

^b L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

^c QUEENSLAND EYE INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OPTIC DISK; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA IMAGE; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THICKNESS; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 76149137428     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.143602     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Academy of Ophthalmology. The primary open angle glaucoma, preferred practice pattern. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, October 2005. http://www.aao.org/ppp (accessed 14 June 2007).
2. Mattox C. Clinical examination of the nerve fiber layer. In: Schuman J S, ed. Imaging in glaucoma. Thorofare: Slack, 1996, chap. 5.
3. Zeimer R, Asrani S, Zou S, et al. Quantitative detection of glaucomatous damage at the posterior pole by retinal thickness mapping. A pilot study. Ophthalmology 1998;105:224-31.
4. Glovinsky Y, Quigley HA, et al. Foveal ganglion cell loss is size dependent in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:395-400.
5. Frishman LJ, Shen FF, Du L, et al. The scotopic electroretinogram of macaque after retinal ganglion cell loss from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:125-41.
6. Wygnanski T, Desatnik H, Quigley HA, et al. Comparison of ganglion cell loss and cone loss in experimental glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:184-9.
7. Weber AJ, Kaufman PL, Hubbard WC. Morphology of single ganglion cells in the glaucomatous primate retina. Invest OphthalmolVis Sci 1998;39:2304-20.
8. Guedes V, Schuman JS, Hertzmark E, et al. Optical coherence tomography measurement of macular and nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous human eyes. Ophthalmology 2003;110:177-89.
9. Lederer DE, Schuman JS, Hertzmark E, et al. Analysis of macular volume in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:838-43.
10. Greenfield DS, Bagga H, Knighton RW. Macular thickness changes in glaucomatous optic neuropathy detected using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:41-6.
11. Medeiros FE, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for gaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:44-55.
12. Anon. Stratus OCT user manual. Dublin, California: Carl Zeiss Meditec, 2002; PN 55648 REV. A 4/03, 1-1-1-3.
13. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:831- 6.
14. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated static perimetry. 2nd edn. St Louis: Mosby, 1999:121-36
15. Swanson EA, Izatt JA, Hee MR, et al. In-vivo retinal imaging by optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 1993;18:1864-6.
16. Fercher AF, Hitzenberger CK, Drexler W, et al. In vivo optical coherence tomography [letter]. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;116:113-14.
17. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, et al. Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. 2nd edn. Boston: Little, Brown, 1991:67-152.
18. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots. BMJ 1994;309:188.
19. Stamper RL. Glaucoma screening. J Glaucoma 1998;7:149-50.
20. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Tannenbaum DP, et al. Identifying early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:228-35.
21. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1993-2003.
22. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2005;112:3-9.
23. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Escano MF, et al. Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:513-20.
24. Parikh, et al. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology. In press.
25. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 2003;326:41-4.
26. Straus SE. Reporting diagnostic tests. BMJ 2003;326:3-4.
27. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, et al. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:2242-50.
28. Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR. Clinical decisions in glaucoma. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1993.
29. Wollstein G, Paunescu LA, Ko TH, et al. Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2005;112:229-37.
30. Mumcuoglu T, Wollstein G, Wojtkowski M, et al. Improved visualization of glaucomatous retinal damage using high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2008;115:782-9.