-
1
-
-
0033552395
-
Why we need large, simple studies of the clinical examination: The problem and a proposed solution
-
McAlister FA, Straus SE, Sackett DL, on behalf of the CARE-COADI Group. Why we need large, simple studies of the clinical examination: the problem and a proposed solution. Lancet 1999;354:1721-4.
-
(1999)
Lancet
, vol.354
, pp. 1721-1724
-
-
McAlister, F.A.1
Straus, S.E.2
Sackett, D.L.3
-
2
-
-
0033568729
-
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests
-
Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-6.
-
(1999)
JAMA
, vol.282
, pp. 1061-1066
-
-
Lijmer, J.G.1
Mol, B.W.2
Heisterkamp, S.3
Bonsel, G.J.4
Prins, M.H.5
Van Der Meulen, J.H.6
-
3
-
-
0037417585
-
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative
-
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 2003;326:41-4.
-
(2003)
BMJ
, vol.326
, pp. 41-44
-
-
Bossuyt, P.M.1
Reitsma, J.B.2
Bruns, D.E.3
Gatsonis, C.A.4
Glasziou, P.P.5
Irwig, L.M.6
-
4
-
-
0029116527
-
Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research
-
Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein A. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. JAMA 1995;274:645-51.
-
(1995)
JAMA
, vol.274
, pp. 645-651
-
-
Reid, M.C.1
Lachs, M.S.2
Feinstein, A.3
-
5
-
-
0023711452
-
The assessment of diagnostic tests: A comparison of medical literature in 1982 and 1985
-
Arroll B, Schechter MT, Sheps SB. The assessment of diagnostic tests: a comparison of medical literature in 1982 and 1985. J Gen Intern Med 1988;3:443-7.
-
(1988)
J Gen Intern Med
, vol.3
, pp. 443-447
-
-
Arroll, B.1
Schechter, M.T.2
Sheps, S.B.3
-
6
-
-
0035901579
-
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised trials: Explanation and elaboration
-
Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:663-94.
-
(2001)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.134
, pp. 663-694
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
Schulz, K.F.2
Moher, D.3
Egger, M.4
Davidoff, F.5
Elbourne, D.6
-
7
-
-
0035906286
-
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomised trials. A comparative before-and-after evaluation
-
Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L, for the CONSORT group. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomised trials. A comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 2001;285:1992-5.
-
(2001)
JAMA
, vol.285
, pp. 1992-1995
-
-
Moher, D.1
Jones, A.2
Lepage, L.3
-
8
-
-
0036347588
-
The reporting of methodological factors in randomised controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist
-
Devereaux PJ, Manns BJ, Ghali WA, Quan H, Guyatt GH. The reporting of methodological factors in randomised controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Control Clin Trials 2002;23:380-8.
-
(2002)
Control Clin Trials
, vol.23
, pp. 380-388
-
-
Devereaux, P.J.1
Manns, B.J.2
Ghali, W.A.3
Quan, H.4
Guyatt, G.H.5
-
9
-
-
0027631390
-
More informative abstracts: Current status and evaluation
-
Haynes RB. More informative abstracts: current status and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:595-7.
-
(1993)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.46
, pp. 595-597
-
-
Haynes, R.B.1
|