Polygyny in thief ants responds to competition and nest limitation but not food resources

Insectes Sociaux

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-28

  McGlynn, T P ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Colony size; Competition; Food limitation; Nest limitation; Polygyny

Indexed keywords

ANT; COLONY STRUCTURE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; FOOD LIMITATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; NESTING; POLYGYNY; QUEEN; RAINFOREST;

COSTA RICA;

FORMICIDAE; SOLENOPSIS; SOLENOPSIS MOLESTA;

EID: 76149100221     PISSN: 00201812     EISSN: 14209098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-009-0045-x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bestelmeyer B. T., Agosti D., Alonso L., Brandão C. R. F., Brown W. L. Jr., Delabie J. H. C. and Silvestre R. 2000. Field techniques for the study of ground-dwelling ants: An overview, description and evaluation. In: Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity (Agosti D., Alonso L. A., Majer J. and Schultz T., Eds), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC. pp 122-144.
2. Bourke A. F. G. and Franks N. R. 1995. Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 550 pp.
3. Byrne M. M. 1994. Ecology of twig-dwelling ants in a wet lowland tropical forest. Biotropica 26: 61-72.
4. Cole B. J. and Wiernasz D. C. 1999. The selective advantage of low relatedness. Science 285: 891-893.
5. Dalecky A., Gaume L., Schatz B., McKey D. and Kjellberg F. 2005. Facultative polygyny in the plant-ant Petalomyrmex phylax (Hymenoptera: Formicinae): sociogenetic and ecological determinants of queen number. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86: 133-151.
6. Evans J. D. 1995. Relatedness threshold for the production of female sexuals in colonies of a polygynous ant, Myrmica tahoensis, as revealed by microsatellite DNA analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92: 6514-6517.
7. Foitzik S., Backus V. L., Trindl A. and Herbers J. M. 2004. Ecology of Leptothorax ants: impact of food, nest sites, and social parasites. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55: 484-493.
8. Helms Cahan S. and Keller L. 2003. Complex hybrid origin of genetic caste determination in harvester ants. Nature 424: 306-309.
9. Herbers J. M. 1993. Ecological determinants of queen number in ants. In: Queen Number and Sociality in Insects (Keller L., Ed), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 262-293.
10. Herbers J. M. 1982. Queen number and colony ergonomics in Leptothorax longispinosus. In: The Biology of Social Insects (Breed M. D., Michener C. D. and Evans H. E., Eds), Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado pp 238-242.
11. Herbers J. M. 1986. Nest site limitation and facultative polygyny in the ant Leptothorax longispinosus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 115-122.
12. Herbers J. M. and Grieco S. 1994. Population structure of Leptothorax ambiguus, a facultatively polygynous and polydomous ant species. J. Evol. Biol. 7: 581-598.
13. Herbers J. M. and Stuart R. J. 1996. Multiple queens in ant nests: impact on genetic structure and inclusive fitness. Am. Nat. 147: 161-187.
14. Hölldobler B. and Wilson E. O. 1977. The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 64: 8-15.
15. Hunt J. 2007. The Evolution of Social Wasps. Oxford University Press, USA. 280 pp.
16. Julian G. E. and Fewell J. H. 2004. Genetic variation and task specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor. Anim. Behav. 68: 1-8.
17. Kaspari M. 1996a. Testing resource-based models of patchiness in four Neotropical litter ant assemblages. Oikos 76: 443-443.
18. 2 scale: disturbance dynamics in three Neotropical forests. Oecologia 107: 265-273.
19. Keller L. 1995. Social life: the paradox of multiple-queen colonies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 355-360.
20. Keller L. and Vargo E. L. 1993. Reproductive structure and reproductive roles in colonies of eusocial insects. In: Queen Number and Sociality in Insects (L. Keller, Ed), Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp 16-44.
21. Kellner K., Traindl A., Heinze J. and D'Ettore P. 2007. Polygyny and polyandry in small ant societies. Mol. Ecol. 16: 2363-2369.
22. Linksvayer T. A. 2008. Queen-worker-brood coadaptation rather than conflict may drive colony resource allocation in the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 647-657.
23. Linksvayer T. A. and Janssen M. A. 2008. Traits underlying the capacity of ant colonies to adapt to disturbance and stress regimes. Syst. Res. 26: 315-329.
24. McDade L. Bawa K. S., Hespenheide H. A. and Hartshorn G. S. 1994. La Selva: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Rain Forest. University of Chicago Press. 493 pp.
25. McGlynn T. P. 2006. Ants on the move: Resource limitation of a litter-nesting ant community in Costa Rica. Biotropica38: 419-427.
26. McGlynn T. P. and Kirksey S. E. 2000. The effect of food presentation and microhabitat upon resource monopoly in a ground-foraging ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) community. Rev. Biol. Trop. 48: 629-642.
27. McGlynn T. P. and Owen J. P. 2002. Food supplementation alters caste allocation in a natural population of Pheidole flavens, a dimorphic leaf-litter dwelling ant. Insect. Soc. 49: 8-14.
28. McGlynn T. P., Salinas D. J., Dunn R. R., Wood T. E., Lawrence D. and Clark D. A. 2007. Phosphorus limits tropical rain forest litter fauna. Biotropica 39: 50-53.
29. McGlynn T. P., Fawcett R. M. and Clark D. A. 2009. Litter biomass and nutrient determinants of ant density, nest size and growth in a Costa Rican tropical wet forest. Biotropica 41: 234-240.
30. Peeters C. and Ito F. 2001. Colony dispersal and the evolution of queen morphology in social Hymenoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 601-630.
31. Robson S. K. A. and Kohout R. J. 2007. A review of the nesting habits and socioecology of the ant genus Polyrhachis Fr. Smith.
32. Rosengren R. and Pamilo P. 1983. The evolution of polygyny and polydomy in mound-building Formica ants. Acta Entomol. Fenn. 42: 65-77.
33. Seppä P., Sundström L. and Punttila P. 1996. Facultative polygyny and habitat succession in boreal ants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 56: 533-551.
34. Smith C., Anderson K., Tillberg C., Gadau J. and Suarez A. 2008. Caste determination in a polymorphic social insect: Nutritional, social, and genetic Factors. Am. Nat. 172: 497-507.
35. Tschinkel W. R. 1991. Insect sociometry, a field in search of data. Insect. Soc. 38: 77-82.
36. Wilson E. O. and Hölldobler B. 2005. Eusociality: origin and consequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102: 13367-13371.
37. Wiernasz J. H., Parker D. G. and Cole B. J. 2008. Mating for variety increases foraging activity in the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Mol. Ecol. 17: 1137-1144.