Finite-volume solution of one-dimensional shallow-water sensitivity equations

Journal of Hydraulic Research

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 811-819

  Guinot, Vincent ^a   Cappelaere, Bernard ^a   Delenne, Carole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

Boundary condition; Finite volume; Free surface flow; Riemann solver; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; APPROXIMATE RIEMANN SOLVER; DISCONTINUOUS FLOW; DISCRETIZATIONS; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; FINITE VOLUME; FREE-SURFACE FLOW; NEIGHBOURHOOD; NUMERICAL CONVERGENCE; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; RIEMANN SOLVER; SHALLOW-WATER; SOURCE TERMS;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COILED TUBING; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; FLOW FIELDS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

BOUNDARY CONDITION; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; FLOW PATTERN; FREE SURFACE FLOW; NUMERICAL METHOD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHALLOW WATER;

EID: 76149091567     PISSN: 00221686     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3826/jhr.2009.3569     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson, M.L., Bangerth, W., Carey, G.F. (2005). Analysis of parameter sensitivity and experimental design for a class of nonlinear partial differential equations. Intl. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 48, 583-605. (Pubitemid 40865270)
2. Andrade Lima, RR., Gandini, A., Blanco, A., Lira, C.A.B.O, Maciel, E.S.G., Alvim, A.C.M., Silva, F.C., Melo, P.F.F., França, W.F.L., Baliño, J.L., Larreteguy, A.E., Lorenzo, A. (1998). Recent advances in perturbative methods applied to nuclear engineering problems. Progress in Nuclear Energy 33(1-2), 23-97. (Pubitemid 128395607)
3. Atkinson, A.C., Donev, A.N. (1992). Optimum experimental design. Clarendon Press, Oxford UK.
4. Bardos, C., Pironneau, O. (2002). A formalism for the differentiation of conservation laws. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences I 335, 839-845.
5. Cunge, J. A., Holly, F.M. Jr., Verwey, A. (1980). Practical aspects of river computational hydraulics. Pitman, London.
6. Davis, S.F. (1988). Simplified second-order Godunov-type methods. SIAM J Scientific and Statistical Computing 9, 455-473.
7. Delenne, C., Guinot, V., Cappelaere, B. (2008). Direct sensitivity computation for the Saint Venant equations with hydraulic jumps. Comptes Rendus de Mécanique 336, 766-771.
8. Elizondo, D., Cappelaere, B., Paure, C. (2002). Automatic versus manual model differentiation to compute sensitivities and solve non-linear inverse problems. Comput. Geosci. 28(3), 309-326. (Pubitemid 34495186)
9. Gejadze, I.Y., Copeland, G.J.M. (2005) Adjoint sensitivity analysis for fluid flow with free surface. Intl. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 47, 1027-1034. (Pubitemid 40413141)
10. Griewank, A. (2000). Evaluating derivatives: Principles and techniques of algorithmic differentiation. SIAM, Philadelphia PA.
11. Guinot, V. (2009). Upwind finite volume solution of sensitivity equations for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws with discontinuous solutions. Computers & Fluids, in press. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.03.002.
12. Guinot, V., Delenne, C., Cappelaere, B. (2009). An approximate Riemann solver for sensitivity equations with discontinuous solutions. Adv. Water Res. 32, 61-77.
13. Guinot, V., Leménager, M., Cappelaere, B. (2007). Sensitivity equations for hyperbolic conservation law-based flow models. Adv. Water Res. 30, 1943-1961. (Pubitemid 46939646)
14. Gunzburger, M.D. (1999). Sensitivities, adjoints and flow optimization. Intl. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 3, 53-78.
15. Harten, A., Lax, P.D., van Leer, B. (1983). On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comp. Physics 50, 235-269.
16. Helton, J.C., Cooke, R.M., McKay, M.D., Saltelli, A. (2006). Sensitivity analysis of model output: SAMO 2004. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91, 1105-1108.
17. Kleiber, M., Antunez, H., Hien, TD., Kowalczyk, P. (1997). Parameter sensitivity in nonlinear mechanics. Wiley, New York.
18. Lyness, J.N., Moler, C.B. (1967). Numerical differentiation of analytic functions. SIAM J. Num. Analysis 4(2), 202-210.
19. Maskey, S., Guinot, V. (2003). Improved first-order second moment method for uncertainty estimation in flood forecasting. Hydrological Sci. J. 48, 183-196. (Pubitemid 36429885)
20. Nujic, M. (1995). Efficient implementation of non-oscillatory schemes for the computation of free surface flows. J. Hydr. Res. 33(1), 101-111.
21. Pappenberger, F., Matgen, P., Beven, K.J., Henry, J.-B., Pfister, L., Fraipontde, P. (2006). Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions. Adv. Water Res. 29, 1430-1449. (Pubitemid 44522816)
22. Patil, S.R., Frey, H.C. (2004). Comparison of sensitivity analysis methods based on applications to a food safety risk assessment model. Risk Analysis 24(3), 573-585.
23. Piasecki, M., Katopodes, N.D. (1997). Control of contaminant releases in rivers 1: Adjoint sensitivity analysis. J. Hydr. Engng. 123(6), 486-492. (Pubitemid 127557735)
24. Pironneau, O. (1974). On optimum design in fluid mechanics. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 97-110.
25. Savic, L., Holly, F.M. Jr. (1993). Dambreak flood waves computed by modified Godunov method. J. Hydr. Res. 31(2), 187-204.
26. Sanders, B.F., Katopodes, N.D. (1999). Control of canal flow by adjoint sensitivity method. J. Irr. Drainage Engng. 125(5), 287-297.
27. Soares-Frazão, S., Guinot, V. (2007). An eigenvector-based reconstruction scheme for the shallow-water equations on twodimensional unstructured meshes. Intl. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 53, 23-55.
28. Stoker, J.J. (1957). Water Waves, Interscience, Wiley, New York.
29. Vazquez-Cendon, M.E. (1999). Improved treatment of source terms in upwind schemes for the shallow water equations in channels with irregular geometry. J. Comp. Phys. 148(2), 497526.
30. White, L.W., Vieux, B., Armand, D., LeDimet, F.X. (2003). Estimation of optimal parameters for a surface hydrology model. Adv. Water Res. 26(3), 337-348. (Pubitemid 36238581)
31. Ying, X., Wang, S.S.Y. (2008). Improved implementation of the HLL approximate Riemann solver for one-dimensional open channel flows, J. Hydr. Res. 46(1), 21-34.